Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser

For the place to request access to the tool, see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions.

CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and temporary accounts). Some administrators are able to check if two or more accounts have been used from the same computer. These users also see User agents. This can help them decide if two accounts are related in the way described above. It is also possible to see if a user is editing from an open proxy.

On this page, users can request some users or IPs to be checked. Good reasons should be given for why a checkuser is needed; you should provide links which show the questionable edits, etc. Questions should usually be created so that they can be answered by yes or no. Responses will be short in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy. Sensitive information (like the IP addresses used by an account) are usually not reported. The results are not always clear, and a decision should not be made only on the basis of checkuser results.

Use of the tool

This tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to the project.

The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more than once or to make it look like more people support an idea). Checkusers will refuse a request, if the reason for checking is not good enough to warrant the use of the tool.

Please see the CheckUser policy for all the rules related to CheckUser.

The list of users with CheckUser access can be seen at: Special:ListUsers/checkuser.

Archives
2007-2008, 2009, 2010-2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 2026: no archives yet (create)

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days. For the archive overview, see Archive.

Current requests

Faiyaz Alam Shaikh, Faiyaz Alam Shaikh (Advocate)

• AlexTBrooklyn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• CiteMaster (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

1st made Faiyaz Alam Shaikh, 2nd recreated Faiyaz Alam Shaikh (Advocate). MathXplore (talk) 02:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 03:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Two heavy ai users

• Cracktastic Science (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• 110 and 135 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Both made very large amounts of ai generated pages Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk | changes) 10:07, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-checkuser observation) I don't think these accounts seem to have any similar behaviours / warrant a check. While the ones 110 and 135 are creating aren't that simple, they are clearly very much based off of enwiki. And the way both of them edit is also quite different. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

I agree with Ferien. This doesn't seem to be a case where a check should be done. -Barras talk 11:29, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, no check needed fr33kman 13:50, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Iranian footballers article

• Sahar789 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Fcdamash6 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Samira688i (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

All are creating articles about Iranian footballer, while the "Sahar789" is looks like a duck, and previously their many account were blocked for evasion. But other account like "Samira688i" states they were not blocked previously. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 06:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

I ended up blocking that one as well, they are all quite clear socks at this point. A checkuser would probably be good to find sleepers. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:59, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Kholasehagency

• Kholasehagency (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Fromdefi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Nftbuilder (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• 2Filipmoris (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Ririho (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

The middle 3 have all created or commented at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Seyed Mohamad Seyed Hoseini. 2Filipmoris created another page, Cubeface Crypto, whose RFD was commented on by Kholasehagency. Nftbuilder has created Amir Feily whose picture on Commons was uploaded by Kholasehagency. Ririho created the page Kholaseh Agency and is blocked as a sock of Kholasehagency per a thread above here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Confirmed, some others blocked as socks fr33kman 16:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

2025 VFF Futsal Champions League

• TechSportScience (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• VaclavEditor (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

WP:EVASION, 1st made 2025 VFF Futsal Champions League, 2nd recreated Talk:2025 VFF Futsal Champions League. MathXplore (talk) 12:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

VaclavEditor is blocked at EN. as a sock of en:Special:Contributions/VaclavHumanAI which is who TechSportScience is blocked as a sock of. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:07, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The username and behaviour makes it quacking sockpuppetry to me, so I blocked them, but checkuser input would still be good. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Data here doesn't show anything but we can rely on enwiki data. Already blocked so no further action needed fr33kman 16:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

cuirmode.fr

• Dara Makhsha (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Matayr Ree (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Global spam(Special:AbuseLog/624335, ), both users are using cuirmode.fr (, ) MathXplore (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 16:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Twospoon

• Twospoon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Fourchild (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Adding here to formally ask for a check. Overlapping interests, with Taiwanese people and articles related to Jeffrey Epstein. Created 3 hours after Twospoon was blocked. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Fourchild. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Unable to confirm with the data we have. Far too many IPs and proxies being used to narrow it down fr33kman 16:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

User: Zubarkokar

The user I am complaining about has abused multiple accounts on Simple wikipedia as well as the English Wikipedia. Please check out the contributions for these:-

• Zubarkokar (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Zubarkokar (Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, Battle of Fazilka, First Kashmir War)

• 9Ahmed9 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/9Ahmed9 (Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, Battle of Fazilka, First Kashmir War) from May-August

• 123Librarian (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/123Librarian (Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, Indo-Pakistani war of 1971)

• Pakoland (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pakoland (Tank Ambush at Kushtia)

• Muhammad_Ahsan2233 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Muhammad_Ahsan2233 (Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, Battle of Fazilka, First Kashmir War, Battle of Chawinda, Tank Ambush at Kushtia)

• Foxmaster0987 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Foxmaster0987 - Baangla (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I like to inform that i was being blocked from English Wikipedia for sock puppetry and then some senior editors suggest me to edit on Simple English Wikipedia and wait for 6 months to request for unblock. Now all those my old accounts logged on my multiple devices and i used them to edit on simple English Wikipedia but never used these accounts to manipulate discussions, vote multiple times, or deceive other editors in any way. I just did simple edits by these accounts. In short, I have never misused them. And as u can see in those edits.

Moving forward, I will use only one account to prevent any future misunderstandings and ensure that I continue to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Once again I did not misuse any of these accounts (u guys can see my edit history on simple Wikipedia), having multiple accounts is allowed on the wiki but from now on I will only use 1 account to avoid misunderstanding. Zubarkokar (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

So you acknowledge that you have used multiple accounts on this Simple English Wikipedia is it?-Baangla (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes but I have never misuse these accounts If I had then I would have been considered a sock puppet, I don't even remember the password for some of these accounts. I have multiple devices and i rarely edit on simple wikipedia so I don't much see from which account i am logged in i just did simple edits, where is nowhere u can see i am using these accounts in edit war, discussion or to avade restrictions. But for about the past month I have been using only this account to edit and I will continue to do so to prevent any future misunderstandings. Zubarkokar (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Could you please list the accounts you have used here to assist everyone in investigating? CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

These accounts already listed by Baangla in his first comment. Zubarkokar (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-checkuser observation) @Baangla: Requests should be formatted using the {{checkuser}} template, with each user A, B, C you believe are socks put into the template like

*{{checkuser|A}}

*{{checkuser|B}}

*{{checkuser|C}}

You do not need to repeatedly question the user accused of sockpuppetry. If checkusers have any questions, they will ask before checking. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

No check required, declined. User has admitted using multiple accounts (which is not forbidden and has stated they'll use only one account from now on. fr33kman 16:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Ilovemarckumsos

• Ilovemarckumsos (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Fgjiseo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Ilovemarckumsos has been creating copy and paste articles about rappers and songs connected to Galactic Records. They have been warned for these kind of pages and are at final warning status. They started creating the articles then changing wording very poorly; basically moving a word or two around in the sentence that made no sense. See yvngxchris as a still active example. Fgjiseo has come along today to edit the same kind of topics. They are also creating pages by copying and pasting then changing the sentences with poor grammar. It appears that these two are the same user and they are just avoiding the potential block on their first account by jumping to the second. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

I’ve also noticed that the edits made by Fgjiseo are very similar to those previously made by Ilovemarckumsos. Both accounts create the same kinds of pages about rappers and also post chat-like questions and answers on talk pages, such as on Talk:Yung Fazo and Talk:Slump6s. I had already advised the first user not to use talk pages this way, so seeing the same behaviour from a new account stood out to me. Saroj (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Adding Colassww (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) as well. They are blocked for creating bad pages about non-notable rappers. On the English Wikipedia, they are editing the same pages as Ilovemarckumsos. Colassww Is blocked from creating pages there, so they seem to be using Ilovemarckumsos to create pages to get around that restriction. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

En checkuser has confirmed the three accounts listed here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

All accounts are blocked, CU unnecessary fr33kman 00:01, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Parrotofsahara

• Parrotofsahara (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• WikiHelperOfficial (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Parrotofsahara recreated Kashmiril, which was previously deleted when WikiHelperOfficial created it. Both of these accounts have similar behavior where they make a few minor edits and then the same promotional article. Please check for any sleepers. Ternera (talk) 15:19, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@Ternera: The two accounts are confirmed. However, given that the block of WikiHelperOfficial is a username softblock, I'm not certain if Parrotofsahara should be blocked. Their creating a new account is not block evasion, and I'm not sure if you'd consider the recreation of the deleted page to necessitate admin action (I'm indifferent on that). Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 04:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Agreed fr33kman 01:07, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Baangla

• Baangla (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• 2025-36627-96 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

• New suspect 2025-37240-99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

That IP user suddenly popped up, no edit history, and start pinging multiple other editors to put ban on me, like here:

Same kind of thing also done by user :Baangla here:

• Both the IP user and Baangla pinged the same user against me. And about the same topic.
• IP user and Baangla supporting same argument on 2025 indo-pak conflict talk page like here:
  
• Editing on the same page try the POV pushing here: IP user removed the analysis section of 2025 conflict page section and Baangla did the same thing here he removed many paragraphs from analysis section
  

New suspect That IP address could be part of this group because of its similar behaviour, no edit history, arrive on 29 November, and immediately starting disruptive editing on the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict page. Its editing patterns are also similar to the first IP user. Like here ~2025-36627-96 the user add the figures that india claim to "destroy 12-13 aircraft" without adding the source in his edit. Same edit again done by ~2025-37240-99 here without adding any source.
Zubarkokar (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

I have not indulged in logged out editing.Baangla (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Declined fr33kman 01:06, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

MaryUnderwood00 and AlexandraTerry

• MaryUnderwood00 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• AlexandraTerry (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Both accounts have a distinctive editing style.

• Similar edit summarise "Added a simple sentence..." Vs "Added a simple English sentence".
• Typically adding an unsourced sentence which doesn't include new information. Perhaps LLM-generated given the range of topics and speed of editing.
• The one substantial edit by both accounts is to create a draft article in a sandbox about a software company.

Richard Nevell (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't see enough evidence to warrant a check. Declined fr33kman 01:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Fr33kman: the editing patterns are unusual, especially for new editors, and similar enough to make coincidence unlikely. Is it a case of needing a better explanation of the similarities or is the threshold for CheckUser that is not met in this instance? Richard Nevell (talk) 10:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The threshold isn't met fr33kman 19:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Fr33kman: For future reference, what is the threshold? Richard Nevell (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

There isn't a preset threshold, it's up to each individual checkuser to use their discretion as to whether or not a particular check should be done. In this case I don't feel the evidence is enough. There could easily be a valid reason that they are acting as they are. If another checkuser thinks differently then they can perform a check if they want to, but I think that's unlikely. Regards, fr33kman 01:52, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Nigersaurus

• Big V Andall (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• BigBoiVandel (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• HiThereDan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

WP:EVASION, Vandalism at Nigersaurus (, , ) MathXplore (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

1st is not confirmed. 2nd and 3rd are the same user and have been blocked. fr33kman 01:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

MKS PAMP SA

• Rrtyhuhuh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Willynjoroge101 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

WP:EVASION, 1st (blocked by Vermont) made MKS PAMP SA, 2nd recreated it. MathXplore (talk) 12:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

@MathXplore: Technically possible, considering behavior I’d call it likely. If they’re not the same person, then I’d expect they work for the same UPE firm. Given I acted on the first account and article, I’ll leave the second to your/another admin’s discretion. Best, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 18:49, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Sonyá Dunbar, Sonya_Dunbar

• Thewsbguy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Mars Knight 25 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

WP:EVASION, 1st (blocked by Vermont) made Sonya_Dunbar, 2nd recreated Sonyá Dunbar. MathXplore (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 19:17, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Ahmad Maha

• HomaSaadat5 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• MinaShaban7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Fcsepahan19 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Immediately after the RfD for Ahmad Maha was closed, Fcsepahan19 and HomaSaadat5 popped up and recreated them. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:49, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 03:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Burugapally Siva Rama Krishna

• AS1-Creative (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Edition of India (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

First account has been created Burugapally Siva Rama Krishna, second account made personal attack against nominator in Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Burugapally Siva Rama Krishna Raayaan9911 16:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Vermont blocked both, so likely they are the same user. Eptalon (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

California Waste Solutions

• Henryvoba (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Chibaybanhmi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

1st made California Waste Solutions, 2nd recreated it. MathXplore (talk) 05:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Unlikely, different addresses geolocate to different geographical locations. Eptalon (talk) 05:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

David Duong

• Gulfsam (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Chibaybanhmi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

1st made David Duong, 2nd recreated it. MathXplore (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Votuanqn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) made David duong. MathXplore (talk) 05:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 02:23, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

instaupapkdl.com

• Freter Moli (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Miran Elo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Global spam(Special:AbuseLog/627327), both users are using instaupapkdl.com(, ). MathXplore (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 02:24, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Transkriptor, Transkriptor.com

• Malana Tu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Anteigerri (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

1st made Transkriptor, 2nd recreated Transkriptor.com. MathXplore (talk) 12:55, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 04:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Edition_of_India

• Edition of India (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• A Harsh Film (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

First one is blocked, both accounts were created Aryan Medical & Educational Trust. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 13:13, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Not confirmed fr33kman 04:29, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Dr Sunita Dube

• Watchingfilm75 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Yàmla madarchod hai (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Special:Diff/10693601 and Special:Diff/10693641. Smells fishy. -Barras talk 17:14, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Well, guess I was right according to the locks. -Barras talk 22:00, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Well, two free blocks, there's at least one overlap.. Eptalon (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

HarryinLondon

Users involved:

• The OSINT Guy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• HarryinLondon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• Rhi12345 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
• ~2025-42149-27 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

Reason: Suspected sockpuppetry and block evasion. All three accounts are Single Purpose Accounts (SPAs) created within days of each other, editing only 2025 India–Pakistan conflict. They are reverting to the exact same text and removing the same sources (AirForces Monthly) with identical arguments. After I reported this on the Administrators' Noticeboard, an IP address (listed above) immediately appeared to make the exact same edit, suggesting the user logged out to evade scrutiny. An editor on the Noticeboard suggested filing a CheckUser request. Please check for technical matches. Zubarkokar (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

If you're saying there is block evasion here, whose block is being evaded? CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

My apologies, I used the wrong terminology. I meant abusive multiple accounts account usage. They appear to be one person using multiple accounts to get majority in a page about a specific narrative. In my request at Wikipedia: Administrators' noticeboard I provided tons of proof. Please have a look. Zubarkokar (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2026 (UTC)