User talk:Cmdrjameson

; Archives
	archive 1 (Sep. 28, 2004 - Mar. 1, 2006); archive 2 (Mar. 4, 2006 - Aug. 31, 2006); archive 3 (Sep. 1, 2006 - Jun. 30, 2007); archive 4 (Jul. 1, 2007 - Jan. 31, 2007); archive 5 (Feb. 1, 2008 - Oct. 27, 2019);

Welcome to Cmdrjameson's talk page.
Please sign your comments using four tildes (`~~~~`). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.	Talk page guidelines Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosamund Grosvenor (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The material needs to be more specifically cited, especially such judgments as "true friend"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiLoop Battlefield weeklyly barnstar

The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar

Congratulations, Cmdrjameson

You have been recognized as the weeklyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefield^{seeking new name},
a crowdsource counter-vandalism patrol and label tool (http://battlefield.wikiloop.org)
for the weekly ending at 2020-04-06.

On behalf of the team and community of WikiLoop Battlefield and as Wikipedians, we like to appreciate your contributions, and look forward for more in the future. Also don't forget to bring your Wikipedian friends who you think are also passionate of keeping Wikipedia protected.

By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
Cheers, xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 08:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Cmdrjameson,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Cmdrjameson,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Cmdrjameson,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot

Hello there! How often and well does your bot fix links with Duplicate https? I'm from the Russian Wikipedia, I corrected everything there. Then I came here and fixed it too. And what would you think? i made 60 edits! Владимир Меланхолин (обс) 11:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor

Hello, Cmdrjameson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor

Hello, Cmdrjameson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rosamund Grosvenor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cmdrjameson. Thank you for your work on Hyacinthe (rapper). Another editor, Justiyaya, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the translation! I've removed the singles section as I think it's overly long and articles don't typically list all singles. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justi yaya 17:42, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Hi there, thank you for all the good work you're doing with translating articles! I see you've also properly attributed them via edit summaries as per WP:TFOLWP, which is great. I just wanted to flag that you may also optionally wish to use Template:Translated page on the talk pages of such articles to give further details. Not essential though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:35, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clubbing for Columbine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Clubbing for Columbine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 14:48, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Les Animaux du monde moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Les Animaux du monde. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cmdrjameson. Thank you for your work on Philippe Milon. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 11:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alba Ventura (journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alba Ventura (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alba Ventura (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cameremote (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Reille moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Karl Reille. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Needs independent reliable sources to establish notability per GNG and/or NARTIST. Most of the article is unsourced.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Netherzone (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cmdrjameson. Thank you for your work on Johannes Mejer. Another editor, Zzz plant, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for translating the article, this is definitely a notable topic. I've marked it as needing more citations since there are several unsourced paragraphs and details I couldn't check in the text. Also- thank you for including translation attribution, but I think maybe you meant it was translated from the German article? I couldn't find this subject on French wikipedia. Thanks again for making this and happy editing,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zzz plant}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zzz plant (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cmdrjameson. Thank you for your work on The Amsterdam Red Light District. Another editor, Agent VII, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Attributed translation from [Amsterdam Red Light District]. Alternative WP:RS to Facebook and YouTube references would be highly appreciated. Notable engough for English Wikipedia with a scope of minor improvements. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Agent 007 (talk) 14:56, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Agent VII: Done, thanks for the suggestion. Cmdrjameson (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Thierry Thuillier

Hello, Cmdrjameson,

Thank you for creating Thierry Thuillier.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

No information about his activities from 2017 to present (it's now October 2025) so maybe warrants an update
The article needs sections for example : "Early life and education," "Career," "TF1 (1990-1994)," "France 2 (1994-2008)," "I>Télé/CNews (2008-2010)," "Return to France Télévisions (2010-2015)," "Canal+ (2015-2016)," "TF1 Group and LCI (2016-present)" You can use your judgement. Everything is in one continuous block of text, making it hard to navigate
The opening sentence in the lead section about being "deputy director of LCI since 2016" is immediately contradicted by later text saying he became general director in 2016. Also The infobox says he worked at Canal+ from June 2015 to September 2019, but the text only mentions 2015-2016. There are issues with the dates not aligning.
No "Personal life" section (married? children? hobbies?), also no discussion of his journalistic style or approach and limited information about the impact of his work or his influence on French television journalism makes me question notability.
Some references lack complete information (e.g., reference 4 just says "Le Monde, 28 August 2007" which points to Le Monde wikipedia article?)
Lastly, while generally neutral, but phrases like "struggling news channel" could be more encyclopedic

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 14:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Partir un jour

Hello, Cmdrjameson,

Thank you for creating Partir un jour.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating the article. There are two issues
The Synopsis and Songs sections are entirely unsourced. Please add sources to fulfil Verifiability (WP:V)
The claim about Cannes Film Festival is a significant claim that needs a source, per WP:BLP and WP:V.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 13:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the suggestions. Done! Cmdrjameson (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Roland Faure

Hello, Cmdrjameson,

Thank you for creating Roland Faure.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The section on Publications is currently unsourced.
The Biography section should be expanded into flowing, narrative prose, detailing the significance of his roles. For example, mention that his tenure at Radio France coincided with deregulation and the creation of a major news format (France Info), or elaborate on his early career at L'Aurore and his early journalism awards (which are not currently mentioned in the English article).
Several facts that confirm his notability (according to search results) are missing: his educational background (Faculty of Law, Aix-en-Provence), and his professional awards (Meilleur jeune journaliste de France in 1950, Prix international du grand reportage in 1962).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clubbing for Columbine has been accepted

Clubbing for Columbine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 19:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Artist Services moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Initial Artist Services. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent with significant coverage of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:27, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]