User talk:AfghanTsakhtan

Welcome!

Hi AfghanTsakhtan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Swat (princely state). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sutyarashi Greetings,

It seems that you have applied no reasoning in this message nor in an edit log to why you have reverted my edits, and how the edit itself can be considered "invalid"

You are known to revert edits and change information online for your own interests, rather than logical and historical reasons

It occurs that you have done this multiple times in the past, with an example of constantly reverting the page for Safi (tribe)Safi, a Pashtun tribe, and removing multiple information about their heads (leaders), and geographical distribution

And you further want to Pakistan-ify history such as the State of Swat, by removing its status of being an independent state before its allegiance of becoming a princely state to the British Empire, as well as its official languages, you removed Persian and Pashto in the main introduction, and plainly added Urdu

Furthermore, you care less about what had actually happened in history by reverting whatever is not in your interests AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 18:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained my 'reasoning' in my edit summary. In addition to being incorrect, you had not provided any source for the changes either. Also refrain from accusing others for harbouring any agenda, this can get you blocked.

Reading Wikipedia:Five pillars can be a great start for you to understand how wikipedia works. Sutyarashi (talk) 04:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultan Mohammad Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadozai. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kurram conflict

You should have moved the 2023 Kurram Parachinar conflict to 2023 Kurram conflict instead of just "Kurram conflict" as there are the 2007 Kurram Agency conflict and 2024 Kurram conflict exist already. KashanAbbas (talk) 11:20, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Appreciated for pointing this mistake out,

I had moved the 2023 Kurram Parachinar conflict page to the Kurram conflict page, as I've seen grammatical errors and redundancies in the title, and because I initially thought that incident was the only one existing, before coming across the 2007 Kurram Agency conflict and the 2024 Kurram conflict pages, which I have then edited.

I had also attempted to once again move the same page to the 2023 Kurram conflict, but was met with a technical error, and still do. I would appreciate it, if you are able to move the page to the desired title. I am now planning to make a category of pages under the umbrella term "Kurram conflict", and feature these pages too. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 06:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted my old redirect and have properly moved the page. KashanAbbas (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That technical error was due to a pre-existing redirect. Just simply blank the page of the redirect and then request its deletion. That fixed the issue for me. KashanAbbas (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 04:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali Ahmad Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Assassination attempts on Hibatullah Akhundzada

The article Assassination attempts on Hibatullah Akhundzada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N - covered in the main article already Hibatullah Akhundzada

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0xReflektor (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There exists an article regarding Assassination attempts on Hamid Karzai, it wouldn't be suitable to delete this page. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion officially dismissed
Reasoning: The already existing article of Assassination attempts on Hamid Karzai and many other articles, as well as the importance of this article due to more than 1 assassination attempt taking place. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sher Dil Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing on 1919 Afghan coup d'état

Hi AfghanTsakhtan. Unfortunately I've had to remove most of the content from 1919 Afghan coup d'état due to excessively close paraphrasing of your sources. Comparing your article to the book, there are a number of places where you have taken text from the source and added it to the article with only superficial changes to the wording. To give you a few examples (overlap highlighted):

Source: However, Aman Allah Khan made sure Nadir Khan was kept as far away from Kabul as possible, dispatching him first to Khost and later to remote Qataghan. (Article: But, Amanullah had made sure that Nadir Khan was kept as far away from Kabul as possible, to which he was initially dispatched to Khost, and later to Qataghan.)
Source: Ali Reza was brought before the Amir, who handed his sword to Mahmud Sami, a former Ottoman army officer from Iraq. Sami first slit the condemned man's mouth and then cleaved him in two with a single stroke of his sword. (Article: Amanullah would not believe the Colonel's claim of being innocent, but handed his sword to an Iraqi slave to execute him, as the slave first slit the Colonel's mouth and then cleaved him into two with a single stroke.)
Source: During his inauguration, Aman Allah Khan publicly denounced his uncle, Nasr Allah Khan, for masterminding Habib Allah Khan's assassination and condemned his half-brothers' oath of allegiance to him as treason (Article: During the inauguration, Amanullah publicly denounced his uncle, Nasrullah Khan by blaming him of being behind the assassination of Nasrullah's brother, Habibullah. He also condemned his half-brothers' oath of allegiance to him as treason.)

Given that I found similar close paraphrasing in most of the places I spot-checked, I've unfortunately had to cut the article down to its lead and request revision deletion of the article's history. You might find WP:FIXCLOSEPARA for understanding how to avoid this in future, and you're of course welcome to continue working on the article. If you have any questions please just let me know. MCE89 (talk) 13:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MCE89

I appreciate your enthusiasm. Am I able to re-write the entire page using the same sources, but with different paraphrasing? If so, then I will work on it in some hours. But, I don't understand what "violated copyright laws", or is this the sole reason for that? AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can definitely rewrite the page — just be careful not to closely paraphrase the source. The reason that extensive close paraphrasing is regarded as a type of copyright violation is because it involves taking a copyrighted source and using its creative expression without permission from the copyright holder. This page explains why this is a problem and how you can avoid it in more detail. MCE89 (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 14:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AfghanTsakhtan. Thank you for your work on Battle of Nowshera (1674). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei: Appreciated. I will surely add more footnotes once I search for more. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AfghanTsakhtan. Thank you for your work on Mohammad Zaman Khan. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources to establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thank you. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 09:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Fateh Khan Barakzai into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 04:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dost Mohammad Khan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nuristani and Hazara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]