Talk:Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please don't make wrong edit

This union has only one genuine website since the page created that is https://ifat.org.in Satishmnavy85 (talk) 02:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IFAT union National President is Mr. Prashant Bhagesh Sawardekar & National General Secretary is Adv. Udaykumar Ambonkar

Their is complete record of the genuinity of the contents & the office bearers of the union , so please don't make any wrong updates as this will add me to submit documental proof to Wikipedia. Don't tamper the permanent website address of this unionSatishmnavy85 (talk) 02:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Your Name will be permanently blocked to get edited on wikipedia page of Indian Federation Of App-Based Transport Workers Satishmnavy85 (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Faulty edit, edit warring

@Satishmnavy85 please stop edit warring to reinstate this faulty edit. External links should not be in an article's body per WP:NOELBODY, the tone is non-neutral, it is inadequetly sourced despite the WP:REFBOMBing since all the references are to a press release which is a WP:PRIMARY source and is not reliable here. Not to mention the broken formatting. Additionally I have concerns over how you're using a LLM to generate edits as evident in this diff, models are not oracles of truth and often run afoul of Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and neutrality, as well as generating text with broken formatting.

Nobody on Wikipedia can WP:OWN own an article, and WP:ONUS states that "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." I am disputing your edit, please self-revert and discuss and reach consensus for inclusion here first. Communication is not optional. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 03:03, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the prose is a mess. However, some of the info, such as the president, ties to the union's website. To that end, I've edited the page to bring it in compliance with WP:EL and WP:MOS. —C.Fred (talk) 03:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks always tried to provide true content as a user. Satishmnavy85 (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Performed additional copy editing to keep a more neutral tone along with other various fixes [1]. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]