Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mammals

Help illustrate climate change information on Wikipedia and win a signed copy of The Climate Book by Greta Thunberg

Dear all

I’m very happy to let you know we are running a competition at Wikiproject Climate Change to encourage people to help improve visual information about climate change including the impact on mammals, biodiversity loss etc. The competition is open until the 17th of May for all language versions of Wikipedia. The top three point scorers will each win a signed copy of The Climate Book by Greta Thunberg.

Please let me know if you have any questions

Thanks :)

John Cummings (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Categorization proposal at WT:PALEO

There is a current discussion regarding categorisation of fossil animals going on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palaeontology#Categorization proposal. Any opinions/voices are welcome. Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Updates needed to cuscus taxonomy

Hi all, I just did some work on the cuscus article to add a full list of cuscus genera and species in table format and noticed that our classification of cuscuses seems to have fallen behind the recent literature due to reliance on MSW3 and/or older IUCN assessments. I utilised volume 5 of the Handbook of the Mammals of the World (published 2015) as my primary reference, and double checked each taxon at Mammal Diversity Database. I chose to follow HMW's classification on the basis that is the most recent complete taxonomy of the group with no reasonable alternative, but have noted differences from MSW3/IUCN taxonomy with footnotes where applicable. I know the guidance at this project is to follow MSW3 or MDD and the IUCN, but MSW3's age and the glacial speed at which new IUCN assessments are released has us lagging behind. Here are the discrepancies I've noticed between HMW/MDD and Wikipedia:

• Ailurops furvus (mountain bear cuscus), previously considered a subspecies of Ailurops ursinus, is recognised as a distinct species but has no Wikipedia article and is not mentioned at the genus or A. ursinus article. HMW notes that A. furvus is endemic to Sulawesi highlands (cf. A. ursinus, found in lowland Sulawesi, Lembeh, Muna Island, and Buton Island) and retains A. u. ursinus, A. u. flavissimus, and A. u. togianus as subspecies of A. ursinus. MDD notes "split from A. ursinus based on morphology, although more data is needed to confirm this", so I see a case for waiting for further research before creating an article, but this definitely warrants mention in the Ailurops and A. ursinus articles.
• HMW and MDD recognise Strigocuscus pelengensis as a species of Phalanger, not Strigocuscus, based on genetic evidence from Meredith et al. 2009. MSW and the IUCN acknowledges both placements (Phalanger pelengensis is the basionym) but lists the species in Strigocuscus and refers the reader to Groves (1987) for current status, which I couldn't find. The Wikipedia article is currently located at the common name Banggai cuscus, but HMW/MDD and the IUCN prefer the common name Peleng cuscus.
• Spilocuscus nudicaudatus (Australian spotted cuscus), previously considered a subspecies of Spilocuscus maculatus, is recognised as a distinct species but has no Wikipedia article and is not mentioned at the genus or S. maculatus article. This separates the Australian spotted cuscuses from the common spotted cuscuses of Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. MDD cites Jackson and Groves' Taxonomy of Australian Mammals (2015) for this split, but I could not access this. Again, I see a case for waiting for IUCN recognition before creating an article, but this similarly warrants mention in the Spilocuscus and S. maculatus articles.
• Strigocuscus sangirensis (small Sangihe cuscus), previously considered a subspecies of Strigocuscus celebensis, is recognised as a distinct species but has no Wikipedia article and is not mentioned at the genus or S. celebensis article. MDD simply cites HMW for this split, and this one seems to have the least evidence (that I could find, anyway) for the split, however, again, this warrants mention at the Strigocuscus and S. celebensis articles.

Frankly, I am out of my depth with all this mammal taxonomy nonsense - I just wanted the cuscus article to actually list all the species of cuscuses in a nice looking table! I would much appreciate it if someone could take a look at the taxa I mentioned and update their articles to at least mention the taxonomy given in more recent publications. Cheers, Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 11:31, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Two years I went through the taxonomy for List of phalangeriformes (and again for List of diprotodonts), following the guidance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals#Guidelines for taxonomy (use MSW3, and adjust where IUCN and MDD agree). Wikipedia articles don't always align with these guidelines when editors feel that they prefer to follow newer research, but for the lists at least I stick to them. For these four species, then:

• Ailurops furvus: MSW3 does not have, IUCN does not have, MDD does have. Result: not included
• Strigocuscus pelengensis: MSW3 has at Strigocuscus, IUCN has at Strigocuscus, MDD has at Phalanger. You say that MSW3 and IUCN allow both placements, but they don't, they just say that there's a minority opinion for Phalanger while listing the species in Strigocuscus. Result: Strigocuscus
• Spilocuscus nudicaudatus: MSW3 does not have, IUCN does not have, MDD does have. Result: not included
• Strigocuscus sangirensis: MSW3 does not have, IUCN does not have, MDD does have. Result: not included

I think it's reasonable to mention these proposals at relevant articles, but by the letter of the guidelines they're all at the right place now. --PresN 11:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

"Brown fur seal" is NOT of the common name of Arctocephalus pusillus

As I stated on the article's talk page, the Society from Marine Mammalogy lists Arctocephalus pusillus as 'Cape fur seal' with subspecies being 'Cape fur seal' (sensu stricto) and 'Australian fur seal'. Likewise google scholar searches for 'brown fur seal' and 'Arctocephalus pusillus' shows that it is not used in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article should be renamed 'Cape fur seal' or Arctocephalus pusillus. LittleJerry (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Peer review for Volcano rabbit

Hello all. I've put up the article volcano rabbit for peer review; any feedback would be a great help! -- Reconrabbit 17:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)