Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:XX)

Welcome to Women in Red!

 Home Article alerts Essays Events Ideas & planning Images Join Metrics Outreach Redlist index Research Resources Showcase Social media Tools & tech 
Reaching a milestone of 20.003% on 16 Dec 2024, Women in Red changes notable women's representation on Wikipedia from red-linked obscurity to an encyclopedic presence.
Find us ...
Here:
or athttps://w.wiki/347

About

[edit]

Welcome to Women in Red (WiR)! We are a group of volunteer (unpaid) editors of all genders who live around the world and belong to many different language and cultural communities. While our project extends over many language versions of Wikipedia, this page is principally devoted to our efforts on the English-language Wikipedia.

We focus on reducing systemic bias regarding gender representation (content gender gap) in the Wikipedia movement. Our goal is to "move the needle" in terms of statistical representation of women and other gender minorities on Wikipedia. We recognized a need for this work in 2014 when we learned that, as of October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women.[1] Without a particular percentage in mind, we recognized that with persistence, we could increase it, one article at a time. With only this in mind, Women in Red was established in July 2015, at Wikimania Mexico City, by Roger Bamkin and Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight.

Women in Red is a very large, on-wiki-based community thanks to you, the editors who participate in our work. Did you know that it is also the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes? Join us!

20% milestone reached in mid-December 2024

[edit]
See communication at 20% milestone

According to Humaniki, the percentage of women's biographies on the English Wikipedia is now over 20%: specifically reaching 20.003% by 16 December 2024. Using QLever, as of 17 November 2025, it had risen further to 20.24%. That means that of 2,096,975 biographies, only 424,459 are about women.[2] Not impressed? "Content gender gap" is a form of systemic bias, and WiR addresses it in a positive way through shared values.

Can we increase the percentage still further? Yes! But we need you in order to do so. How? There are more than 34,000 general forum comments from over 1,200 different editors on our talkpage.[3] Ask there. You don't have to be a member in order to participate in the conversations; just please be civil.

Do the articles have to be perfect when they are created? No. But establishing them according to Wikipedia's policies is the first step, and that's the focus of Women in Red: new article creation. Over time, other editors will improve these articles; maybe that's you.

Where the work is done

[edit]

On Wikipedia

[edit]

Our Wikipedia WikiProject focuses on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues. Our editors create articles in many different language Wikipedias. The objective is to turn "redlinks" (like this one) into blue ones. That's why we are called "Women in Red".

We take an inclusive view towards subject matter, editors, and language communities:

  • Editors: We do not focus on the gender of the editor. Anyone/everyone is welcome to be a member, participant, enthusiast of Women in Red. If you participate in WiR, you can join up officially using the box in the top right-hand corner of this page. You are also welcome to add our userbox template {{User WikiProject Women in Red}} to your user page, to produce:
This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in Red
  • Language communities: While Women in Red began on English Wikipedia, it is an international commitment with dozens of other language communities. Please add a link to your language's coordination page here.
  • Subject matter:
  • If the subject of the article self-identifies as a woman, a non-binary person, and/or any other gender minority, that person is included within the scope of Women in Red. Historic cases where it's unknown how they self-identified also count. The goal of the project is to increase inclusion, and we'd rather not block article subjects from being included in an article creation drive.
  • In addition to creating new articles, we create and maintain hundreds of lists of "missing" notable women. Some of these women have an article on some language Wikipedia, while others have no article in any Wikipedia. We call these lists, "redlists".
  • Click on our Redlinks index to see our lists of missing articles by focus area, occupation and nationality. Like everything else on Wikipedia, this is incomplete, so feel free to add pertinent items to our crowd-sourced lists.
  • While all redlists have redlinks, our redlists are generated in numerous ways:

Wikimedia Commons

[edit]
"Sue"

Every year, our members upload thousands of images to Wikimedia Commons: photographs of women, their signatures, their works, etc. In turn, these images can be added to Wikipedia articles. This is another way people can be involved in improving women's representation on Wikipedia. Over 10,000 new images were added in 2022.

Wikidata

[edit]

We create and improve Wikidata items related to women, women's works, and women's issues.

Announcements

[edit]
Please post recent announcements directly on this page for improved page editing history, watcher alerts and greater visibility

Add new announcements to the top. Sign with ~~~~. Remove old ones after a couple of months.

Events

[edit]
For a complete list of events, visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Events.

Ongoing initiatives

  • 2025 year-long initiative: Music
  • 2025 year-long initiative: #1day1woman

    • New for this month

    • November 2025: Alphabet run: U, V, W
    • November 2025: Asian women

      • Recently completed

      • October 2025: Alphabet run: S & T
      • October 2025: Women in STEM
      • October 2025: Halloween

        • Upcoming events

        • December 2025: Alphabet run: X, Y, Z
        • December 2025: Food and drink
        • December 2025 – January 2026: Women who died: 2025
          • [edit]

          WiR works by filling in missing articles based on extensive lists of needed topics. The index to our wide range of topics and nationalities can be found at the Redlist index. Please make these red links blue. Notable women without a Wikipedia biography can be added to any crowd-sourced redlists they match; and added to wikidata such that they're included in wikidata-derived redlists. We also have a guide to adding names to redlists, and to creating new redlists.

          Article alerts

          [edit]
          See Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women for articles about women that are nominated for deletion.
          This section is a transcluded subpage, and may contain more information than is shown here. To view or edit, go to /Article alerts (watch this section).
          Note: This report is based on the {{WIR}} banners of WikiProject Women in Red. If an article isn't listed here, first verify that it has one of those banners. If it has another women-related banner, like {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}} or {{WikiProject Women scientists}}, look on those projects' article alert pages instead.

          Did you know

          (6 more...)

          Articles for deletion

          (81 more...)

          Proposed deletions

          • 25 Nov 2025 – Beverly Mock (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by Graham Beards (t · c): This fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics)
          • 16 Nov 2025 – Amy Ellington (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Spritor (t · c) was deproded by Liz (t · c) on 23 Nov 2025

          Redirects for discussion

          Featured topic candidates

          Good article nominees

          (7 more...)

          Peer reviews

          Articles for creation


          Declined drafts

          [edit]

          Thanks firstly to Ronhjones, and now to Galobtter, we have a bot showing declined drafts submitted to AfC. Weekly updates highlight those most recently listed under New Additions. With a little bit of attention, some of them could well be moved to mainspace, encouraging the editors who created them to progress on Wikipedia.

          Resources and research

          [edit]

          WiR maintains resources to help you contribute, including lists of topical books and external links, information on editing in general, and contacts you can reach out to for specific needs. They can be found at Resources.

          Academic research on Wikipedia's content gender gap is also documented at Research.

          Metrics

          [edit]
          This section is a transcluded subpage, containing more information than is shown here. To view detailed month-by-month results or to edit, go to Metrics.

          About: additional details

          [edit]

          The articles created for any month, including the current month, can be displayed by clicking on one of the months in the archive box.

          We track the articles we create each month. Reports bot updates these lists automatically, but you can manually add and annotate entries. The bot will remove non-existent pages. More details about the bot. Our metrics talkpage is here: Metrics talkpage

          The evolving list for this month (see Archives box) is created by the bot which lists new women's biographies on the basis of their female gender on Wikidata. At present, the bot does not list women's works, associations or related articles but you are encouraged to add these to the list manually. A WiR Wikidata page provides information on how you can help ensure WiR metrics are up-to-date.

          The graph shows the number of articles created each month. The apparent decrease for the current month reflects the number of articles created up to today's date. Only data on completed months indicate overall progress.

          For personal metrics on how many articles you've created about women, see this tool.

          Totals at a glance

          [edit]
          Year Portion if
          applicable                     		Total Daily
          average
          2015 18 Jul – 31 Dec 11,711 70
          2016 28,399 77
          2017 28,271 77
          2018 27,323 75
          2019 27,207 75
          2020 30,119 82
          2021 26,780 73
          2022 18,893 52
          2023 17,925 49
          2024 20,142 55
          2025 Jan - July 8,923 42
          Grand total 245,693

          Updated: Rosiestep (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

          Summary of Women in Red statistics from main page

          [edit]
          Date Women Bios Percentage Increase in
           % for year          		 Increase
          in women
          for year          		 Increase
          in bios
          for year          		 Percentage
          for year
          30-Sep-2015 205,814 1,299,047 15.84%
          1-Jan-2017 240,445 1,432,907 16.78% 0.94% 34,631 133,860 25.87%
          1-Jan-2018 262,099 1,509,348 17.37% 0.58% 21,654 76,441 28.33%
          31-Dec-2018 279,959 1,573,341 17.79% 0.43% 17,860 63,993 27.91%
          30-Dec-2019 305,072 1,678,323 18.18% 0.38% 25,113 104,982 23.92%
          11-Jan-2021 332,622 1,778,126 18.71% 0.53% 27,550 99,803 27.60%
          3-Jan-2022 356,439 1,865,516 19.11% 0.40% 23,817 87,390 27.25%
          2-Jan-2023 373,263 1,921,359 19.43% 0.32% 16,824 55,843 30.13%
          1-Jan-2024 390,207 1,978,991 19.72% 0.29% 16,944 57,632 29.40%
          30-Dec-2024 408,840 2,042,975 20.01% 0.29% 18,633 63,984 29.12%
          Total 4.16% 203,026 743,928 27.29%

          Note: the September 2015 figure was reported here.

          The figure of 20% (408,183 women out of 2,040,570 biographies) was achieved in the 16 December 2024 update. TSventon (talk) 00:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

          Further background on metrics

          [edit]

          As a result of figures presented by Humaniki, we keep posting on the main Women in Red page the percentage of women's biographies on the English version of Wikipedia. Increases are steady but marginal: for example from July 2022 to July 2023, the percentage has risen from around 19.3% to around 19.6%.

          Thanks to an analysis presented by Andrew Gray on the WIR talk page, it certainly looks as if the number of men and women involved in sports has a significant influence on the statistics for women. A detailed account of Gray's work is presented in "Gender and BLPs on Wikipedia, redux", which he published on 2 August 2023.

          The two lists below show that biographies of living people (BLPs) born in recent years are approximately 50% female if data on all categories of athletes are excluded. By contrast, the equivalent overall figures (including athletes) are only around 25%. As a result, biographies of very large numbers of male sportspeople seem to be responsible for the huge difference. Andrew Gray's detailed lists below document how figures for BLPs by year of birth have evolved over the years:

          Overall development of BLPs since the 1920s for all biographies

          • Missing birth year BLPs – 150,574, of which 53,355 female – 35.4%
          • 1920s birth BLPs – 5,096, of which 1,325 female – 26.0%
          • 1930s birth BLPs – 39,055, of which 7,086 female – 18.1%
          • 1940s birth BLPs – 95,602, of which 18,495 female – 19.3%
          • 1950s birth BLPs – 128,518, of which 27,172 female – 21.1%
          • 1960s birth BLPs – 145,300, of which 33,390 female – 23.0%
          • 1970s birth BLPs – 150,539, of which 37,893 female – 25.2%
          • 1980s birth BLPs – 171,072, of which 42,880 female – 25.1%
          • 1990s birth BLPs – 150,880, of which 36,944 female – 24.5%
          • 2000s birth BLPs – 30,042, of which 7,542 female – 25.1%

          Development of BLPs since the 1920s for biographies excluding athletes

          If we discount all athletes using the infobox method, the results are:

          • Missing birth year BLPs – 140,177, of which 51,021 female – 36.4%
          • 1920s birth BLPs – 4,321, of which 1,228 female – 28.4%
          • 1930s birth BLPs – 28,978, of which 6,161 female – 21.2%
          • 1940s birth BLPs – 73,095, of which 16,566 female – 22.7%
          • 1950s birth BLPs – 95,893, of which 23,644 female – 24.7%
          • 1960s birth BLPs – 96,175, of which 26,632 female – 27.8%
          • 1970s birth BLPs – 81,682, of which 27,562 female – 33.7%
          • 1980s birth BLPs – 58,078, of which 24,816 female – 42.7%
          • 1990s birth BLPs – 23,281, of which 11,754 female – 50.5%
          • 2000s birth BLPs – 2,850, of which 1,539 female – 54.0%


          Showcase

          [edit]
          Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Showcase
          See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Recognized content

          WiR is amazing and has way too much to showcase here. Please see Showcase for our recent and past achievements.

          Recent Did You Know? blurbs

          [edit]
          Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/DYK

          These are the 20 most recent WP:DYK entries for WiR. Updated approximately weekly by User:JL-Bot.

          • ... that Madeleine Tchicaya declined the president of Ivory Coast's offer to run for a second term in the National Assembly, as she was reportedly "bored to death"? (2025-11-21)
          • ... that several journalists have attributed the suicide of Lia Smith to anti-transgender policies? (2025-11-20)
          • ... that Masoud El Amaratly, one of Iraq's most popular folk singers in the 1920s (recording featured), was a mustarjil? (2025-11-20)
          • ... that Bijal P. Trivedi wrote on how cystic fibrosis went from being a "death sentence" for children to becoming a treatable condition due to new drugs that brought "weeping with joy"? (2025-11-14)
          • ... that Kirkus Reviews called Jenny Price's environmentalist book Stop Saving the Planet! a "fun introduction to a serious topic"? (2025-11-10)
          • ... that Ivete da Graça Correia was once called "the public face of the São Tomé anti-drug campaign"? (2025-11-10)
          • ... that Berenice Olmedo once sold products made from dog carcasses at a flea market? (2025-11-09)
          • ... that Amy Louise Daniels worked with wobbly rats? (2025-11-06)
          • ... that the children's music singer Damaris Gelabert was the first Catalan music channel on YouTube to win a Silver Button? (2025-11-05)
          • ... that, after proclaiming it was her duty as a revolutionary never to be "tied down by a family", Lyubov Radchenko got married and had a child? (2025-11-04)
          • ... that the art of Villains Are Destined to Die was said to be "almost in-between the Disney happy-ending fairy tales and the original Grimm's stories"? (2025-10-31)
          • ... that Tish Weinstock got married over the Halloween weekend in 2022 at a castle wearing a wedding dress made from antique lace styled after Morticia Addams? (2025-10-31)
          • ... that police forced Eva Coo and her accomplice to reenact a killing at the crime scene using the victim's exhumed body? (2025-10-31)
          • ... that in 1973 Carme Travesset became the first woman in Andorra to hold elected office? (2025-10-30)
          • ... that The New York Times once said that Reba Paeff Mirsky sounded like she had "two right hands and two left hands"? (2025-10-29)
          • ... that Barbara Buczek intentionally composed music so intricate that it was nearly impossible to realise all of its details? (2025-10-25)
          • ... that soprano Sarah Fischer (pictured) sang excerpts from the title role in Carmen for the very first televised BBC broadcast of opera music? (2025-10-22)
          • ... that a hospitalized Ruth El Saffar had to dictate the introduction of her final book to Diana de Armas Wilson, with whom she had co-edited Quixotic Desire? (2025-10-21)
          • ... that the pianist Panka Pelishek was a Heroine of Socialist Labor? (2025-10-21)
          • ... that Denise Stoklos's "essential theatre" involves minimizing her acting methods while maximizing "the power of drama"? (2025-10-21)

          Transcluding 20 of 3029 total

          Press

          [edit]

          There has been considerable press coverage of WiR, to the point where the project has its own Wikipedia article. Below are some recent articles. To add articles to the list, visit Press.

          Academia

          [edit]

          In addition to listings under Research, academic papers on gender bias in Wikipedia (as recorded in Wikidata) are listed in Scholia.

          To include a paper, create an item about it on Wikidata (check first to avoid duplicates) and give it main subject (P921) = gender bias on Wikipedia (Q17002416).

          References

          [edit]
          1. ^ Graells-Garrido, Eduardo; Lalmas, Mounia; Menczer, Filippo (2015). "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media - HT '15: 165–174. arXiv:1502.02341. doi:10.1145/2700171.2791036. S2CID 1082360.
          2. ^ "Qlever".
          3. ^ "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red • en.wikipedia.org". XTools.
          [edit]
          Wikimedia Commons has media related to WikiProject Women in Red.
          Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red&oldid=1322548009"