Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases:
- The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13) or abandoned user subpages of non-contributors (U6)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator.
- The second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft, to userspace or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting the restoration of a deleted article.
This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11, G12, or G15 be undeleted here.
Instructions for special cases:
- G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
- For JavaScript .js or .css pages, please request on the Wikipedia:Interface administrators' noticeboard.
Lil Mosey discography
[edit]This page was deleted in accordance with G5 as it was created by a blocked user. For a few weeks now the page remains unrestored and whilst this is not crucial as the artist has a navbox, it does mean a seemingly innocuous page (not irreparable from usual problems I see with discography lists like unsourced chart placements/releases) remains removed, though I don't remember any problems with the page. I'm not a common Wikipedia editor, just a writer about music, so I'm not sure if I can be of any help restoring and clearing the page up, but I figured it was worth requesting an undelete. The artist's discography in question could possibly apply for a merge to the main page. Hopefully this is formatted ok! —Roevwadefr (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Roevwadefr, in general I don't like to see good content go to waste but also we don't want to encourage socking, especially prolific socking. It was not just created by a sock of a blocked user but edited by at least three socks of that user and probably more block evasion with IP accounts but what looks like little edits from others. Normally with G5 deletions I would happily draftify or userfy so the requestor could do enough to make G5 ineligible by having "substantial edits by others", but as you said "I'm not sure if I can be of any help restoring and clearing the page up" it's not clear that is what you intend to do. Without "substantial edits by others" it is likely to just be re-deleted and as a standard format discography it is also not obvious what substantial edits could be made. So it's a no from me, but happy for any other admin to disagree, I just thought you deserved an answer. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Osmanthus-scented Winter Rice Wine
[edit]Hi, I'm Yivieww, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Yivieww (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Yivieww: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Hugh R. Wilson
[edit]Hi, I'm Vincentferrera, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Vincentferrera (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Vincentferrera: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:MC Shadow
[edit]Hi, I'm Theoriginalgen, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Gen (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Theoriginalgen: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Shopland
[edit]Hi, I'm Crouch, Swale, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:37, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @Crouch, Swale: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Alfred Zack McElroy
[edit]Hi, I'm Remarkable Assiduity, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. I had more research to do. I will get back to the draft now. Thank you. Remarkable Assiduity (talk) 21:40, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Remarkable Assiduity: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland
[edit]- Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Article was deleted via expired PROD and I have just recreated it. I would like to view the original article to see if any material can be used for the new article —Aŭstriano (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. @Aŭstriano: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
User:Grapesurgeon/Cia-Cia language and Hangul
[edit]- User:Grapesurgeon/Cia-Cia language and Hangul · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
need something from my old userspace draft —grapesurgeon (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Twin Method
[edit]Hi, I'm Seacactus 13, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Seacactus 13 (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Seacactus 13:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Salvio giuliano 07:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
File:Cadillac (logo).svg
[edit]Pretty sure I tagged it as keep local, was moved to Commons, and then (shockingly) deleted... ——Locke Cole • t • c • b 05:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Locke Cole
Done KylieTastic (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic, thanks, is it possible to get the file from revision 2023-05-15T00:04:41 restored as well? I was unaware someone replaced the color logo with a black and white variant, which is possibly how this happened. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 11:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Locke Cole, I have done that as the person who replaced is no longer active. However the current logo in use is File:Cadillac logo BW.svg which appears to be the current one on the website. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic Thank you, there was a discussion from a few years ago on the article talk page that I cited numerous sources for this being the current logo (the black logo is for their EV line, which is supposed to replace all their ICE vehicles by 2030). You can see the mark in use on current year ICE vehicles as well. Regardless, I intend to research the situation today, and either restore it as the primary mark, or add it as an historical mark (as this logo is probably the most famous one people are familiar with). —Locke Cole • t • c • b 18:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Locke Cole, I have done that as the person who replaced is no longer active. However the current logo in use is File:Cadillac logo BW.svg which appears to be the current one on the website. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic, thanks, is it possible to get the file from revision 2023-05-15T00:04:41 restored as well? I was unaware someone replaced the color logo with a black and white variant, which is possibly how this happened. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 11:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Arnab Laha
[edit]Dear Administrators,
I would like to request the undeletion or restoration to my user sandbox of the article Arnab Laha, which was recently deleted. The subject is a notable Indian filmmaker, cinematographer, production designer, and screenwriter with significant verifiable international recognition.
Arnab Laha’s short film The Horse from Heaven (2022) was India’s official entry to the 95th Academy Awards (Oscars) and was officially screened at the Kolkata International Film Festival, Bengaluru International Film Festival, and the VGIK International Film Festival in Moscow.
In 2025, he was selected as the only cinematography fellow representing India at the Busan International Film Festival’s Asian Film Academy (BAFA), sponsored by Chanel, one of Asia’s most prestigious film fellowships.
He has received several national awards for Best Cinematography, including at The Himalayan Film Festival (2021), Alphaviram (NID Ahmedabad, 2022), Waves Short Film Festival, Goa, and the Kolkata International Film Festival. In 2023, he received Best Graphic Designer at the International Film Festival of India (IFFI), Goa.
The deleted article already contained over twenty reliable sources and external links to independent newspapers, official film festival websites, and press releases verifying these achievements. These satisfy Wikipedia’s general notability and verifiability guidelines (WP:BIO, WP:ARTIST, WP:V).
I fully understand the need for proper sourcing and neutrality. I kindly request that the article be restored to my user sandbox so that I can continue to improve citation formatting, tone, and references before resubmitting it for review through the Articles for Creation process.
Thank you for your time and consideration. —ArnabLaha95 (talk) 06:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Salvio giuliano 07:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- And asking again and again, hoping to receive a different answer is considered WP:ADMINSHOPPING, which is disruptive. Salvio giuliano 07:33, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Art for Tomorrow
[edit]Hi, I'm Nikol234, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Nikol234 (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Salvio giuliano 12:27, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: Myfi6262's response was to section below - moved. KylieTastic (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Myfi6262: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: Myfi6262's response was to section below - moved. KylieTastic (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Ben Kentish
[edit]Hi, I'm Myfi6262, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Myfi6262 (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Moved from wrong section above:
- Yes I plan to edit and improve it immediately Myfi6262 (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Myfi6262 did you respond to the wrong request as this was not originally requested by you? KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes sorry Myfi6262 (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Myfi6262 did you respond to the wrong request as this was not originally requested by you? KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Myfi6262
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Arun Kumar S.Haripad
[edit]Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Add topic" button below —Rajeevcv (talk) 12:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Rajeevcv
Please repair your request – we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}}(replacingpagenamewith the name of the page you wish to have restored andreasoningwith the reason for your request). Neither Arun Kumar S.Haripad nor Draft:Arun Kumar S.Haripad have existed and you have no deleted edits. KylieTastic (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Derek Tieku
[edit]Hi, I'm Kezyfooty, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kezyfooty (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Kezyfooty
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Nairobi Primary School
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 105.163.1.1 (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Salvio giuliano 16:43, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Nairobi Primary School
[edit]Hi, I'm Ryan Kaviu M, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Ryan Kaviu M (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Already done Salvio giuliano 16:43, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Eric Bauer
[edit]Hi, I'm Murphey2240, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Murphey2240 (talk) 16:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Murphey2240:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Salvio giuliano 16:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Jim Held
[edit]Hi, I'm MinorRiverDeity, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MinorRiverDeity (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. @MinorRiverDeity: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- I have plans to completely re-work the draft, adding context and depth related to the active years as well as the legacy in the context of the broader industry. More print and digital sources are available, and their context will be integrated into the draft. MinorRiverDeity (talk) 23:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- @MinorRiverDeity:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @MinorRiverDeity:
- I have plans to completely re-work the draft, adding context and depth related to the active years as well as the legacy in the context of the broader industry. More print and digital sources are available, and their context will be integrated into the draft. MinorRiverDeity (talk) 23:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Efraim Halevi (Freddie Grunsfeld)
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 5.28.187.8 (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:19, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mauro Giovanni Carta
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 95.251.88.140 (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:James Matthews (ship)
[edit]Hi, I'm ITBF, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. I T B F 📢 00:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @ITBF:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 00:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Rich Murray (film director)
[edit]Hi, I'm Joanna M. Graham, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Joanna M. Graham (talk) 01:04, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Joanna M. Graham:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 02:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Can you please move this back to a user subpage. Please don't call this "disruptive" or "trolling" and please don't block me for this. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 01:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BodhiHarp:
Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, ComplexRational (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. BD2412 T 03:00, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 I have already taken this to deletion review, but still no restoring. I would probably support deletion now because it would clutter up the encyclopedia, but I do want it restored back to a user subpage. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 03:04, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BodhiHarp: To what possible end? The page had nothing on it but a list of a half dozen mathematical operations with outcomes equivalent to 3 + 3 (e.g., 3 x 2; 5 + 1). There is no encyclopedic value for this existing in any namespace. You are free to recreate that content in your sandbox (at least, no one will stop you), but this deleted page will not be restored. BD2412 T 03:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BD2412 I have already taken this to deletion review, but still no restoring. I would probably support deletion now because it would clutter up the encyclopedia, but I do want it restored back to a user subpage. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 03:04, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 October 25#3 + 3 (math). —Cryptic 03:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC))
Draft:Amber A'Lee Frost
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 02:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Dr Arun Kumar S. Haripad
[edit]Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Add topic" button below —Rajeevcv (talk) 08:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Please repair your request – we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}}(replacingpagenamewith the name of the page you wish to have restored andreasoningwith the reason for your request). Same as when you asked before, Dr Arun Kumar S. Haripad has not existed. KylieTastic (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Arun Kumar S. Haripad · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] was deleted via soft delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar S. Haripad. The subject was a Malayalam poet. Most references doe not work any more, though [1] still exists. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Please undelete this page, so I can history-merge it with Socialist democracy, per this bot report. Once I'm done with that, I'll redirect it to Socialist Democracy (disambiguation). Thanks. Graham87 (talk) 09:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic: It seems to have been an accident, but you only restored one revision there.. I've done that sort of thing before ... Graham87 (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Done now Graham87 KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic: It seems to have been an accident, but you only restored one revision there.. I've done that sort of thing before ... Graham87 (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Please restore this page so I can history merge it (or at least its first edit) with Talk:Peter Williams. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Please history-merge this page, so it can be history-merged with Talk:Alvimar de Oliveira Costa. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Semih Lütfü Turgut
[edit]To whom it may concern,
Dear Sir, Ma'am
I am appealing the deletion of Draft:Semih Lütfü Turgut.
The deletion was made under the G15 criterion (LLM content), but this was a clear mistake because the article had already been approved by another reviewer, Suitskvarts, moments before deletion.
I here by wish to categorically confirm that the content was sourced using reliable sources like the Turkish ministry of foreign affairs and the Sri Lankan Parliament. Every statement was verified.
I request the community to kindly restore the draft so the approved, verified content can be moved to the main encyclopedia.
Your assistance in this regard is greatly appreciated
Sincerely,Samrajkur (talk) 14:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Samrajkur:
Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 15:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC) - I have deleted your duplicate request below. The draft was properly deleted. You are free to create a fresh new one, but do not use an LLM to do so. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Daaga
[edit]Hi, I'm ITBF, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. I T B F 📢 14:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @ITBF:
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Please note that you need to provide inline citations per WP:REFB, not just a list of sources. UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Sigourney Beaver
[edit]Looking to develop article in the draft space. Thanks! —--Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Another Believer:
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigourney Beaver, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 15:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Huh? I've had several deleted pages restored to the draft space. I'm not sure I follow, but I guess I'll just start from scratch then. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:13, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Stifle: I had started a post to your user talk page seeking restoration to the draft space but saw your message asking editors to go here instead. I would like to work on this entry in the draft space, if someone can please restore. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm willing to restore soft deletes and PROD contests to draft. This was a hard delete. Since the admin directed you here, your only other option is DRV. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, Stifle directed you to DRV. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Stifle's note starts with "If you want a page undeleted as a draft please list at WP:REFUND". I'd like the page restored to the draft space for future development. I don't see this as a controversial ask, but I'll move on and just start the page from scratch at a later date as I'm confident the subject is notable. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- When you open a new discussion on their talk, it says to come here. You are right there is also that notice, I didn't see that first. Still, please open a DRV request. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not interested in arguing about the AfD decision. I'm interested in developing the entry in the draft space because I think the community got this vote wrong. It seems I'm not going to get the help I'd like here, so I'll move on. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies, I've recently changed my approach to dealing with these requests and my editnotices and instructions might be a little contradictory. I'll try and sort that out.
- As for this request, I'm fine with restoring it to draft and have done so; Draft:Sigourney Beaver is available to you. Stifle (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Stifle: Do you mind restoring the talk page, too? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Nothing to restore other than Wikiproject banners (biography, Chicago, United States, Women, Women in Red 293). Stifle (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'll take that as a no, then. Thanks again for your help! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Nothing to restore other than Wikiproject banners (biography, Chicago, United States, Women, Women in Red 293). Stifle (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Stifle: Do you mind restoring the talk page, too? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- When you open a new discussion on their talk, it says to come here. You are right there is also that notice, I didn't see that first. Still, please open a DRV request. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Stifle's note starts with "If you want a page undeleted as a draft please list at WP:REFUND". I'd like the page restored to the draft space for future development. I don't see this as a controversial ask, but I'll move on and just start the page from scratch at a later date as I'm confident the subject is notable. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Stifle: I had started a post to your user talk page seeking restoration to the draft space but saw your message asking editors to go here instead. I would like to work on this entry in the draft space, if someone can please restore. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- UtherSRG, where do you get this misguided idea from? Refund is for restoration in the original location of uncontroversial deletions, or for refund in draft/userspace of "controversial" deletions (usually after AfD, but not for copyvio, attack pages, ...). While I don't see the potential to have an article here, Another Believer is at the right place to ask for refund draftification and your refusal is not in line with the instructions at the top of the page.
- Can you please stop playing that you are still an admin and just accept that you lack the necessary policy knowledge on way, way too many issues and should just resign and be done with it? You are really being disruptive. Fram (talk) 15:33, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fram not sure where you got the idea that UtherSRG made this up. The response they gave was the templated one as taken from Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Administrator_instructions. Also the instructions at the top of the page say that restoration to user/draft-space is for "deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator". Certainly admins do sometimes refund such non soft-deleted AfDs to user/draft-space, especially when the deleting admin says to ask here or is no longer active, but the most used response I have seen is the {{subst:UND|afd|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page|Adminname}} as UtherSRG gave. Personally I would prefer a slightly more lenient approach if the processing admin see potential, but as you say yourself that is not evident in this case. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Your bolded text is for the "first case" of the instructions (restoration in the same place where it was deleted), the request was for the "second case" of the instructions at the top. "In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you". Fram (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry you're correct the second case does allow for the userfication, but again is at odds with what appears to have been common response. I would be happy to do more userifcation that send people to the deleting admin and certainly WP:DRV. KylieTastic (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- In the admin instructions you link to as well, we have the bullet point "If the article was deleted under any of the speedy deletion criteria for articles, or was deleted as the result of an WP:AFD discussion, then the content may be userfied providing it violates none of the general speedy deletion criteria or the speedy deletion criteria for user pages." Fram (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree the instructions at the top of the admin instruction page do allow for userfication of such, but it is contradictory with the text of the standard template for non soft-deleted AfDs. I have certainly userfied ones before, but since I've been working here the templated response is the most used one not just by UtherSRG. Certainly something worth addressing for the sake of both the requestor and admins. KylieTastic (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Where do you see such contradiction? All it says is that non soft-deleted AfDs won't be restored in article space. Which wasn't requested. That some template doesn't match the actual instructions is hardly an excuse: admins are supposed to know and follow the admin instructions and the text at the top of this page, not some template which contradicts these but which has no official standing. @UtherSRG: as they may not be aware that this is still being discussed. Fram (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- The contradiction is with the wording "Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page, it cannot be undeleted through this process". While yes an unrelated template would not count over general instructions, in this case they are both on the same page and I would take both as being agreed to equally by consensus. I'm agreeing with you I believe that template is overused, worded badly and probably not what was intended for this process. My only contention is that this is not UtherSRG going rouge but a more general problem in how multiple admins have been interpreting such AfD requests. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Kylie. Indeed, there are discrepancies between the instructions and common practice. There are deleted articles I'm willing to userify or draftify, and those generally lean towards the side of having just barely crossed the threshold from soft delete to hard delete. This was not the case here. I note the instructions say
content may be userfied
(bolding mine) and not "content must be userfied". I read that as it is up to admin discretion, not that our hands are bound to a particular action. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)- So, they may be userfied, unless UtherSRG is the first to reply. Got it... Fram (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- There are times others have come in after and said "meh, I'll userfy/draftify/restore", and there are times I've done that to a decliner as well. The rules here are on the squishy side. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Fram: Just a quick clarification. Strictly speaking, even if "UtherSRG is the first to reply" and declines, it is possible for another admin to ignore that determination and restore to draft anyway. BD2412 T 23:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I know, but often there will be only one person to look at such requests (we have enough admin backlogs that most admins won't double check an already declined request). What I don't get is why UtherSRG thinks "may, not must" means "I can just deny it for no good reason at all" instead of "if you don't feel like restoring it, ignore this one and move on to the next request". When an editor in good standing asks for draftification of an article they created, and you just deny that request without actually providing a reason (the template isn't a reason and is used incorrectly here anyway, as it is about restoring articles to the mainspace), then you aren't being constructive or collaborative, but are just exercising power because you can. There may be good reasons to actively deny requests, but I don't see those here at all, only arguments which boil down to "I may do so if I want to". Fram (talk) 10:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Then again, why do I expect UtherSRG to be actually helpful. Today, they undelete Draft:Emily Barkann (G13 deletion), so far so good. The editor who requested undeletion of this draft (previous version was from 2022) created a completely new version. During this rewrite, they remove the previous AfC rejection templates. So, instead of readding these and informing the editor that they should leave these in place even if they are three years old, they just revert everything[2]. I'm so completely fed up with this. Fram (talk) 10:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- So, they may be userfied, unless UtherSRG is the first to reply. Got it... Fram (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion on the wordings of the template at WT:Requests for undeletion#AfD template rephrasing. Jay 💬 11:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Kylie. Indeed, there are discrepancies between the instructions and common practice. There are deleted articles I'm willing to userify or draftify, and those generally lean towards the side of having just barely crossed the threshold from soft delete to hard delete. This was not the case here. I note the instructions say
- The contradiction is with the wording "Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page, it cannot be undeleted through this process". While yes an unrelated template would not count over general instructions, in this case they are both on the same page and I would take both as being agreed to equally by consensus. I'm agreeing with you I believe that template is overused, worded badly and probably not what was intended for this process. My only contention is that this is not UtherSRG going rouge but a more general problem in how multiple admins have been interpreting such AfD requests. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Where do you see such contradiction? All it says is that non soft-deleted AfDs won't be restored in article space. Which wasn't requested. That some template doesn't match the actual instructions is hardly an excuse: admins are supposed to know and follow the admin instructions and the text at the top of this page, not some template which contradicts these but which has no official standing. @UtherSRG: as they may not be aware that this is still being discussed. Fram (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree the instructions at the top of the admin instruction page do allow for userfication of such, but it is contradictory with the text of the standard template for non soft-deleted AfDs. I have certainly userfied ones before, but since I've been working here the templated response is the most used one not just by UtherSRG. Certainly something worth addressing for the sake of both the requestor and admins. KylieTastic (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Your bolded text is for the "first case" of the instructions (restoration in the same place where it was deleted), the request was for the "second case" of the instructions at the top. "In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you". Fram (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fram not sure where you got the idea that UtherSRG made this up. The response they gave was the templated one as taken from Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Administrator_instructions. Also the instructions at the top of the page say that restoration to user/draft-space is for "deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator". Certainly admins do sometimes refund such non soft-deleted AfDs to user/draft-space, especially when the deleting admin says to ask here or is no longer active, but the most used response I have seen is the {{subst:UND|afd|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page|Adminname}} as UtherSRG gave. Personally I would prefer a slightly more lenient approach if the processing admin see potential, but as you say yourself that is not evident in this case. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Huh? I've had several deleted pages restored to the draft space. I'm not sure I follow, but I guess I'll just start from scratch then. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:13, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Dutch M53 helmet
[edit]Hi, I'm Protoj, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. protoj (talk) 15:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Protoj:
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Salvio giuliano 15:53, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading
[edit]- Draft:Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm Blesseni, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Blesseni (talk) 15:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Blesseni:
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Salvio giuliano 15:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
I requested deletion, but now I want it undeleted because of this. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 16:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BodhiHarp I think you may have been misinterpreting what I was saying on my talk page. This page should not be restored, as it is completely unprecedented for us to have a standalone page for a prenasalized realization of a sound. I added the Vao example to ⟨d̼⟩, which is the only page that needs to exist for this sound. ~ oklopfer (💬) 16:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Let's restore it, then make it a redirect. But I requested deletion, so I can request undeletion, right? - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 16:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- What reason would there to be restore it if you just want to make a redirect? ~ oklopfer (💬) 17:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- You don't need something to be restored if you're not going to use the previous content there. You can redirect-ify it without getting into any trouble. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- What reason would there to be restore it if you just want to make a redirect? ~ oklopfer (💬) 17:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Let's restore it, then make it a redirect. But I requested deletion, so I can request undeletion, right? - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 16:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Cibohaphephobia
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-31203-69 (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-31203-69
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:CT Insider
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-30927-33 (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @~2025-30927-33:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Faisal Ahmed
[edit]Hi, I'm Faisal.Ahmed.F57, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Faisal.Ahmed.F57 (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Faisal.Ahmed.F57:
Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Kudpung (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Introducing Faisal Ahmed
[edit]Businessman,Biker, and Gamer.Faisal.Ahmed.F57 (talk) 18:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Faisal —Faisal.Ahmed.F57 (talk) 18:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Faisal.Ahmed.F57:
Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. UtherSRG (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Ambrosiella grosmanniae
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Knocking on Armageddon's Door
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Le Bains Douches
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mecki (character)
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:The South Fork Natural History Museum and Nature Center
[edit]- Draft:The South Fork Natural History Museum and Nature Center · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:New Perennial Movement
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Phyllis Pressman
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Richard Morgiève
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Thierry Lentz
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Nikolaevsky Cavalry School
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 21:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mary Jane Treacy
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 21:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Anton Erkelenz
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 21:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Saga de l'été
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 21:13, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Not done There is no content at this title beyond the name in the title itself (the words, "Saga de l'été"), ergo nothing to restore. BD2412 T 21:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Could you please restore it? I like to recreate old drafts even if there's not much there for my own record keeping purposes. Thank you, Thriley (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- double (edit conflict)! I had actually already just done, then had two edit conflicts. Thriley
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Deb Donig, PhD
[edit]Hi, I'm Maxamica, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Maxamica (talk) 01:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Maxamica:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 02:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
The Flowolf
[edit]Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flowolf
I am requesting the restoration of The Flowolf’s article, which was previously soft-deleted. There are now new, substantial, and reliable sources available that establish the artist’s notability in accordance with the relevant guidelines.
Supporting Information:
TurnTable Chart (NXT Emerging Artistes)
The Flowolf has appeared on the nationally recognized TurnTable Chart, which serves as an authoritative source documenting music performance and chart placements in Nigeria.
Vanguard Newspaper (2019)
The Flowolf was cited among the Top 10 Hottest Nigerian New Wave Artists in an article by Vanguard, one of Nigeria’s most reputable national newspapers.
These references demonstrate significant national coverage and verifiable recognition within the Nigerian music industry, fulfilling the notability requirements for musical artists.
Please consider undeleting The Flowolf’s entry so that these reliable, independent sources can be properly cited to reflect his verified contributions and recognition within the Nigerian music scene.
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/12/top-10-hottest-nigerian-new-wave-artists-in-2019/
Thank you for your time and consideration. —~2025-31310-78 (talk) 03:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request. @~2025-31310-78: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Technosphere
[edit]Hi, I'm Espanocanuck, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. New literature has emerged that helps to identify it as distinct from the Anthroposphere. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Espanocanuck (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Espanocanuck: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Cheops (board game)
[edit]This article was deleted by PROD in 2012, I do have one article about it[3] and would like to see what else can be found. Can you please restore the article and its talk page so that I can work on it? Thank you! :) —BOZ (talk) 04:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BOZ:
Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Cheops (board game). Salvio giuliano 06:25, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @Salvio giuliano! :) BOZ (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
CA MOHANSINGH
[edit]Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Add topic" button below —CA MOHAN SINGH (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Request for undeletion of page: India GST
Hello, I would like to request the undeletion or userfication of the article “India GST” (Goods and Services Tax in India).
I understand that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria (such as A7 or G11) are not typically undeleted directly. If possible, I request that the deleted content be userfied to my userspace so I can improve it in line with Wikipedia’s notability, neutrality, and verifiability guidelines.
I plan to add reliable references from government publications, economic journals, and reputable news sources to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s standards. Once revised, I will resubmit the article for review.
Thank you for your consideration.
- The only deleted contributions of yours I can see are to User:CA MOHAN SINGH. If your request is about that page, the answer is
Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Salvio giuliano 10:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Heartstopper (1989 Film)
[edit]Hi, I'm Bodylockers, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Bodylockers (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Bodylockers:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Salvio giuliano 14:04, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Social Medicine Research Unit
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-31452-21 (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- @~2025-31452-21:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Salvio giuliano 17:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Samu/elle Striewski
[edit]Hi, I'm Queer.polis, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Queer.polis (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Queer.polis
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. KylieTastic (talk) 21:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Alice Bhandhukravi
[edit]Hi, I'm Themichellepenny, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it as we now have stronger external references. Thank you so much. Themichellepenny (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Themichellepenny
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Uv (package manager)
[edit]Hi, I'm Sink Cat, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page to the title "uv (package manager)" (all lowercase) so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 02:02, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello, please temporarily undelete this page, so I can history-merge this edit at CPD to the right place and import this edit from the Nostalgia Wikipedia while I'm there. I'll mark the page for re-deletion once I'm done. Feel free to move the history to my userspace if that'd be better. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 06:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Done Salvio giuliano 07:20, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm finished with it now. Graham87 (talk) 07:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Redeleted, thanks. Salvio giuliano 07:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm finished with it now. Graham87 (talk) 07:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
File:Old logo Aserca Airlines (2007-2012).png
[edit]- File:Old logo Aserca Airlines (2007-2012).png · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi,please restored this logo,in local Wikipedia (Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 October 28#File:Old logo Aserca Airlines (2007-2012).png) I and user LDW5432 voted was keep that the logo is a good record for old logos (google translator). AbchyZa22 (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @AbchyZa22:
Done – as a non-free file deleted as orphaned, this has been restored upon request. Please note that the file needs to be de-orphaned within 7 days, otherwise it may be deleted again per CSD F5. Once the file is in use on an article, please remove the {{di-orphaned fair use}}tag. While a deletion discussion was held, the file was deleted as F5 and the discussion closed by a bot. It seems clear this was otherwise going to not be deleted. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Rekha Pandey
[edit]Hi, I'm Karsom509, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Karsom509 (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Karsom509:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Salvio giuliano 08:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:NJ Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association (NJ FMBA)
[edit]- Draft:NJ Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association (NJ FMBA) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-31665-75 (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @~2025-31665-75:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I will move it to Draft:New Jersey Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association. Please read WP:REFB to learn how to properly cite sources with inline citations. This will be required in order to get your draft accepted as an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Espo0485: Please always log in to edit. After some cleanup, I ran the draft through a copyright checker and it matches the organizations website in a significant way. I have tagged it for deletion, but have not deleted it. While you have disclosed your paid connection to the organization, that doesn't give you free reign to copy-paste their website here. You must rewrite it in your own words. We do not care much about what the organization has to say for itself; we want to know what others have written about the organization. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Dolo Tonight
[edit]Draft:Dolo Tonight · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Please restore the last deleted revision of Draft:Dolo Tonight so I (User:369katy) can improve it. Thank you! —369katy (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- 369katy
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Ion Ganea
[edit]Requesting undeletion of this subject deleted via PROD. Subject is notable with plenty of coverage in newspapers of his time, such as this, this or this. —BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- BeanieFan11
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Coutesy ping Geschichte as original nom. KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KylieTastic: Thanks. Two other things I just remembered: could you also restore Draft:Dirdja Wihardja and Draft:Nasser Madani? Awhile back I had contested those PRODs, which were restored to draftspace, but I never got around to moving them back. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Rathmichael Parish National School
[edit]acc got hacked so i couldnt work on it Tian you W (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Tian you W
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Jack Burright (Counter Strikes International)
[edit]- Draft:Jack Burright (Counter Strikes International) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm Jack Burright, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Jack Burright (talk) 21:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Jack Burright
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. KylieTastic (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Piney_Branch_Complex
[edit]I think this is a good article to add to wikipedia. I would like a second chance to edit this article and try again —Boomersooner6553 (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Boomersooner6553
Done KylieTastic (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I will not submit it again until it is better, with more citations, etc. Boomersooner6553 (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Rich Burk
[edit]Hi, I'm Daltonburk42, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Daltonburk42 (talk) 23:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Daltonburk42:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 23:20, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:IH8RAP
[edit]Hi, I'm Bobsanski, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Bobsanski (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Bobsanski
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. KylieTastic (talk) 09:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Adam Wilkinson
[edit]Hi, I'm Kevinward01, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kevinward01 (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Kevinward01
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Borun Thokchom
[edit]Hi, I'm PZ008, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. PZ008 (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Also the page appears to be an LLM/AI creation so would be up for deletion under WP:G15. KylieTastic (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Please do a history-only undeletion of this talk page, because the article history was restored in 2009. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 10:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Also please do a similar undeletion at Special:Undelete/Talk:Ism, for the sake of page history. Graham87 (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Graham87
Done first one done. Second not done as just a personal statement by an IP editor about their "religious philosophy" and "path" not about the subject. KylieTastic (talk) 10:21, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Ian Liston
[edit]Hi, I'm ~2025-31843-64, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. It was last updated 22 June 2025 so was still within the 6-month window so should not have been deleted. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-31843-64 (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-31843-64
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The 22 June 2025 edit was a bot so does not count to resetting a G13 clock. KylieTastic (talk) 10:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Harriet Notter
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Salvio giuliano 16:13, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Charlotte Molesworth
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley:
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Salvio giuliano 17:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Coogan’s
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Not done an article already exists at Coogan's and this was just a redirect. Salvio giuliano 17:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)