Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



July 2025

[edit]

The article needs a fairly large CE to become readable in one sitting as most of it is an unending wall of text. Some effort was put into writing and adding decent refs etc. but it is a headache to get through.Packerfan386beer here 10:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

icon Working Admittedly this isn't my usual subject area, so I've asked WikiProject Television for advice on which parts to trim. Rosaecetalkcontribs 17:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done I'm so sorry, but some personal issues have prevented me from giving as much attention to this article as I would like. Besides, I think this article might be better off in the hands of someone more knowledgeable on the subject. I have copyedited up to the end of the independence section if anyone would like to continue. Rosaecetalkcontribs 21:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
13k words is crazy Kingsacrificer (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

Recently moved to mainspace. Needs a second pair of eyes. Thanks. –DMartin 21:50, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

icon WorkingLastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 13:15, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done Worked out most of the article except 'Episodes', because I wasn't confident I can improve it as person who has never watched the showl. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 14:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
icon Working 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 18:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 22:01, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

I would really appreciate it if somebody could copy-edit this before I submit this for a GAN. The previous review pointed out some grammatical errors which have since been fixed, but it'd be great if somebody could look over it to make sure there are no other mistakes that weren't noticed before! MadelynnSienna (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it looks like the article is GA already. Do you still need it to be copyedited? Wikieditor662 (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@MadelynnSienna Nudge. Tarlby (t) (c) 22:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very ancient FA, and may need some work with formatting, structuring, and flow. Harizotoh9 (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

icon Working Rosaecetalkcontribs 12:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thought I'd give a quick update. Apologies for taking so long on this article; I'm still working on it, I've just been super busy lately. I picked this up for this month's GOCE drive but I don't think I'll be able to finish it in time ;-;
On a more positive note, I'm almost done with the article body! I'm currently working on the release section so I have just a couple more sections after that. Rosaecetalkcontribs 10:10, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there's no rush on this. If this is to run for TFA, it would run in late 2026 nearly a year from now. Thank you for your work on this. Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome :) Rosaecetalkcontribs 10:15, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

The article is a mess of various tenses and has several unsourced rando factoids throughout. It could also use a good CE for common grammar/ MOS errors and likely will need of a bit reorganization to flow better. Thanks!Packerfan386beer here 08:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New and large article, needs a copyedit with fresh eyes before a view towards GA (GAN) please. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

The page recently underwent an FAC where prose issues were noted. It would be nice to have this get a CE, theres some American English that needs to be fixed as well apparently. (Note it's not my FAC I'm just watching the page) Olliefant (she/her) 21:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: content wise this is 98% ready; I would massively appreciate this article having some outside input/perspective from a copyeditor to help improve the readability, flow, and organization of facts, or highlight other issues/errors I made. I would massively appreciate this as this is my favourite album listened to and written about in 2025. Thanks!!!, // Chchcheckit (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For GA (GAN), might need to be trimmed down on the Beginnings and breakthrough section. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For potential FAC. Lazman321 (talk) 06:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A copyedit would be appreciated in preparation for GA nominating (GAN) this at some point in the uncertain future. Chetsford (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recently made article that might need revisions.Tintor2 (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating as per Talk:Aima Baig#Women in Green 20-minute assessment, thank you! — M. Billoo 18:00, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An FA of mine which I recently made some changes and did a cleanup. LittleJerry (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is disorganized and repetitive. The sectioning is simultaneously highly-specific and overgeneral. Valereee (talk) 11:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On it. Lfstevens (talk) 03:05, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy editing. Thanks Tempdispacc (talk) 09:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a historical biography of a 19th-century Welsh printer and early Latter-day Saint. The article is stable and mostly complete, but it needs help polishing prose and flow. It's been rated as C-class and I'd like to bring it up to B-class (BCN). JasonRawlins (talk) 19:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about one of the most productive fossil-human sites in the world, and I'm trying to get it to FA (FAC) for the Four Award. I had nominated it but it didn't get enough reviews. One critique was prose and I have been told my whole life that I don't speak English like a normal person, so I'd appreciate a prose lookthrough. It is in standard American English. Thanks in advance! Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 22:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An old GA that was almost completely rewrittten during an attempt AFD. Especially the reception.Tintor2 (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GAN — An article I have helped bring up to B-class and would like to have a copy editor look through and make any changes needed. It isn't a very long article and I have tried my best to polish it up but any help will be greatly appreciated. TheBestEditorInEngland (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit for encyclopedic tone. Valereee (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working to expand the manicule article on the little pointing hand (). The plan is to nominate it for a Good Article (GAN) review soon, and possibly as a Featured Article candidate down the line. Any help is appreciated. Rjjiii (talk) 22:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was promoted to GA some years ago and was recently updated. I think that, as usual with my writing, it is suffering from choppiness, lack of flow, and perhaps confusing structure, repetition and sentences in the wrong place. I think the individual sentences are probably not too bad, but if one of you could tell the story more clearly and improve the flow that would be great as this is such a deadly problem for Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit in advance of a possible Good article nomination (GAN). Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:59, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the other long forgotten band FA that hasn't run on the main page (TFA). This one is from 2010, and I think it needs some work with flow and grammar. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Close to being brought to FAC in the future. Please fix anything you see. Thank you! Tarlby (t) (c) 05:15, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit ahead of a possible Good article nomination (GAN). Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:30, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would be good to have an experienced editor work on this very short article. Purpose: CCN Kingsacrificer (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate a copyedit to this article. I'll submit to to GAN once the copyedit is complete.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:53, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So basically I was told that my article still has some promotional language to it despite me doing a thorough rewrite of it, cleaning and filtering out "promotional" language. I have reached a point where any remaining "promotional tone" is mild residue from quoting the university's own documents and I have made attributions to the University and proper sources. Please help me. I don't know what to do at this point. Thank you. Quackyisland (talk) 12:04, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]