User talk:Wikinowsam
| This is Wikinowsam's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Bruce Fisher (July 24)
[edit]
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Bruce Fisher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Bruce Fisher (July 26)
[edit]This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Bruce Fisher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Wikinowsam!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MediaKyle (talk) 10:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Fisher (psychologist) (August 7)
[edit]This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruce Fisher (psychologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Fisher (psychologist) (September 2)
[edit]Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bruce Fisher (psychologist) instead.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If the article either is ready for the encyclopedia or appears to be ready for the encyclopedia, the draft will be redirected to the article. However, the article could have been moved into article space instead.
If the article does not appear to be ready for the encyclopedia, the article may be nominated for deletion, and the draft will be kept.
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruce Fisher (psychologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Bruce Fisher (September 2)
[edit]Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bruce Fisher (psychologist) instead.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion. If you did not intend to create multiple copies of a draft, you may ask for advice at the Teahouse about submitting drafts for review.
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Bruce Fisher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AI
[edit]Hi -- I added the AI generated tag to Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale as the article shows very strong tells that it has been generated by AI and not thoroughly reviewed. Please do not remove it until all of the issues are addressed without AI. Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- What exactly need to be done as I have got this content from the client who wanted to upload details regarding Dr. Bruce Fisher. Wikinowsam (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi -- first of all, if by "the client" you mean someone who is paying for article edits then you're required to disclose that via the instructions here, no exceptions. I don't see where that's been done before your comment just now.
- Besides that, all content needs to be reviewed, without using AI, to ensure that they meet our quality standards, including verifiabiity, reliable sourcing, and neutral and non-promotional point of view, and also that they follow our style guide. The article very much reads like unreviewed AI-generated content, which does not meet any of those standards:
- Formatting from ChatGPT and other AI tools is different than Wikipedia formatting and very distinctive. Right now the ChatGPT-style formatting is left in, which is close to a dead giveaway that AI was used.
- ChatGPT and other tools can make up fake references and URLs. For instance, the article links to the URL "https://fisherdivorceadjustmentscale.org/about-dr-bruce." This URL does not exist, and is not indexed by the Internet Archive suggesting it may not have existed when the article was created either. Not only does this mean the content isn't verifiable, but it suggests that no one ever even went to the URL, because if they did it would be immediately obvious that it doesn't exist.
- Even when the sources in AI-generated text are real, they are not necessarily reliable. One of the studies in your initial version of the article comes from Asian Social Science, which is an unreliable predatory open-access journal (more info here). Another citation, the Divorce Seminar Center, is not only another broken link, but is listed under
recognized by professional publishers and organizations
-- implying it's an independent organization, when it actually appears to be affiliated with Fisher. - ChatGPT and other tools tend to write in a promotional tone, for instance in phrases like
The FDAS has been validated in multiple cultural and linguistic settings, demonstrating its international relevance
.
- As for what needs to be done:
- Disclose the paid editings per the instructions above.
- Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
- Write a version of the article yourself, without using AI, that adheres to them.
- Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Somepinkdude (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)