User talk:TheSlumPanda

Your draft article, Draft:17th Rajasthan Assembly

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "17th Rajasthan Assembly".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:26, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames

Your account will be reported if you continue against rules of Wikipedia. This is not a slambook where every random term is added. Next time you might face serious reporting if you keep adding fancruft to Shubman Gill's page. 223.178.208.148 (talk) 11:17, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to TheSlumPanda for collecting more than 30.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's JUN25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 9,500 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt ■ 15:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2028 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election

Hello, TheSlumPanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2028 Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM

Hello,

Was this edit made using an LLM? Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 11:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what does LLM means ? I edited this article entirely to make it better grammatically or organise properly in headings TheSlumPanda (talk) 13:28, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM stands for Large Language Model like ChatGPT. Articles should be written primarily in prose, not bulleted lists assembled by an LLM. Did you use ChatGPT or a similar service to make this edit? Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not regularly but sometimes i use GPT. And i also manually edit the generated text before publishing it on Wikipedia to remove any plagiarism or copy vio issues. TheSlumPanda (talk) 19:12, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vilas Dangre

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vilas Dangre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neera Arya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheSlumPanda! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Paradoxical Notability Guidelines, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vilas Dangre

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vilas Dangre".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of educational institutions in Jaipur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of educational institutions in Jaipur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rameshwar Lal Dudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nokha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raja Mahendra Pratap Singh University logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raja Mahendra Pratap Singh University logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look

Hi, can you provide timestamp for this. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I forgot to add it (40:16 min.) there. Thanks for letting me know TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Shashank Udapurkar. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know TheSlumPanda (talk) 14:52, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vice-chancellors of the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences

A tag has been placed on Category:Vice-chancellors of the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had removed the tag. This category have two articles now. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 09:45, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of notable domestic murder cases in India

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of notable domestic murder cases in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neera Arya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neera Arya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neera Arya (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 13:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Utkal Ranjan Sahoo

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Utkal Ranjan Sahoo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaudhary Hari Ram has been accepted

Chaudhary Hari Ram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Abhaybeniwalreengus per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhaybeniwalreengus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sohom (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSlumPanda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since the creation of my TheSlumPanda account i had created this encyclopaedia in good faith and had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions. I also request admins to review my edits like deletion discussions or articles created by me or any other random edits. In these two years since the creation of my account I heavily edited about politicians of Rajasthan, as i belong to this state, but i neither did anything which have WO:COI as i only wrote the cited information for maintaining the integrity of this platform. As far as Hanuman Beniwal and Virendra Singh Burdak Article are concerned, firstly at this time Hanuman Beniwal is quite active in Politics of Rajasthan that’s why i edited his page thoroughly and as far as Virendra Burdak is concerned, he is son of former Rajasthan political stalwart Narayan Singh Burdak and i hasn’t edited only their pages i also created and expanded pages on many political figures. I request admins to go through my editing history for a while and i am ready to comply the procedure established by our community for unblocking procedure.TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not at all address the reason for the block, namely, sockpuppetry. asilvering (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise against unblocking this user. They have pushed a Jat related point of view across hundreds of articles, and even after I warned them twice, they continued and never disclosed their conflict of interest regarding Jat related topics. After reviewing large portions of their edits, it is clear that many of them violate our neutral point of view guidelines. Their edit history shows a pattern of reverting other editors simply to keep their preferred version. On both the Hindi and English Wikipedia articles about Hanuman Beniwal, they repeatedly added only positive information and softened criticism. Hundreds of their edits will need to be reverted because they promote a caste biased narrative. Their filter log also shows that they were using ChatGPT generated material as sources and citing it in articles, which explains how they were able to shape their preferred versions while avoiding scrutiny in contentious topic areas.

If unblocking ever happens, a topic ban from Jat related biographies and articles, and from Rajasthan politician and legislation related topics, would help protect the project from further POV pushing. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer I don’t think that i have pushed a Jat related point of view across hundreds of articles, rather i tried to improve the article related to the Jat community as i added many notable persons on the List of Jats articles which all are supported by the reliable secondary sources and WP:CASTEID, and also i had improved articles related to this community such as Jats, and the Jat Mahasabha, as i added information backed by sources. Also many a times i removed dozens of Castecruft words such as Jat from BLPs which were not complying with the WP:CASTEID. Secondly about the Hanuman Beniwal topic as you have said I softened their criticism is also false because i was already planning to add a controversy section in his article, but at that time I didn’t find enough reliable sources for this controversial career, and since then i am working on it. At last, about the ChatGPT, some user previously already asked me weather i use it or not then i already revealed that i some time use GPT whenever i want to write some complex paragraphs in grammatical correct manner, but I didn’t used exact GPT generated content anywhere. Whenever i use the GPTs i always use to modify the generated by cross checking the content with the backed reliable sources.TheSlumPanda (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TheSlumPanda, it is practically not so possible that you will get unblocked before 6 months. Denial will not work. You must accept that you did engage in pro-Jat POV pushing. This does not mean that I don't appreciate the good work you were doing here. I expect you to return after 6 months and refrain from pro-Jat editing. THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 15:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]