Jump to content

User talk:SquawkGuard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What WikiProject for a draft article about a film

[edit]

Hi there,

I noticed that "Out of Evil," a 1950-1 Israeli film which was listed on the main program of the 6th Locarno Film Festival, was one of few which did not have its own article. So I drafted one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Out_of_Evil

I tagged it with the tags for WikiProject on Israeli cinema:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Israeli_cinema_task_force

But maybe there is a more fitting or active project, I am not sure. Would you kindly take a peek at my draft and let me know what you think?

Thank you in advance.

HussainHx (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! @HussainHx:
I just took a look and this is great! I love new movie pages and it was fun to learn about this film!
The main concern for any article getting reviewed is notability. I think this is definitely notable (and likely a reviewer would too), but I lean towards inclusionism on Wikipedia. Adding a source or two would help ensure it goes through.

In all though, this page is well done and there are some easy fixes to make it even better.
First sentence:
  • Generally, you don’t need inline sources in the opening sentence for a film's director and date on film pages
  • IMDB is not often used as an inline citation, here's an essay (i.e not a Wikipedia style rule), but I think it's good practice Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. It’s often used for cast lists. And good practice is to make an External Links section (it goes after references) and use the Template:IMDb title ex {{IMDb title|0088247|The Terminator}}
For the second sentence:
  • consider copyright. The second sentence is pretty close to the exact words of the source, so I would change this a bit. This is a low-stakes example, but copyright is always something to watch for.
  • Also, this may not be a super strong source (even though it's definitely correct here) Adding another source somewhere would help beef up the page
Plot sections:
  • Plot sections or synopsis sections actually don’t need sources. The film itself is considered the source. I think a smart move is to just keep this source on the page in another section it adds to (which you already did!)
Reappraisal I would change to Themes
  • This follows the naming conventions on other film pages in the Wiki:Manual of Style/Film a little cleaner and it matches with information in this section a little better in my opinion.
  • Oh and maybe add a little "Scholar," to Amanda Bernstein. You want to establish why this person is an expert on the topic they are writing on.
Final fix
  • {{CinemaofIsrael}} goes at the bottom of page after the reflist in the source code. (And yes it's totally appropriate here!)
Looking to lots of other film pages and the Wiki:Manual of Style/Film is super helpful to figure out the style.

Again, this is really great! On the sources, I know I started by saying "you could add more sources" and then said "these parts don't actually need sources", which sounds counterintuitive, but that's how the wikistyle works :) For notability, any source you could add (maybe a critic review or production detail) would help make sure it's clearly notable to any reviewer, even though I think it's notable already.
Not sure if this is your first film page, but this is awesome. I hope you keep it up!

SquawkGuard (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. (if you don't already switch between visual and source code editing I highly recommend it. It makes templates much easier to work with or for example Draft:Out of Evil) SquawkGuard (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HussainHx:
Hey, I got excited by your article and really should have focused on your main question better!
The WP:Israeli cinema task force totally applies to this film. It's not required to add that to the bottom of the main article page, but it works and fits. Once the article is up the article's Talk page is where you can add other project tags like "WikiProject Film" and countries .
Also! found a source you could add Israeli Film Archive/Out of Evil and I'll take a look in my library database too, see if I can find a review.
SquawkGuard (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi :-)
This is my first film page—my only other article submission so far has been for Triptonide. Thank you for your kind words.
I appreciate your enthusiasm and guidance so very much. My main concern was the WikiProject but I was hoping to get as much from you as you were willing and able to offer.
I have made the following changes to the draft:
  • Changed IMDB cite from inline to external using template, per custom
  • Rephrased synopsis sentence in lede for reasons of copyright and completeness
  • Cited Israeli Film Archive (IFA) for sentence in lede as it discusses film in more depth—thank you for locating that
  • Added IFA info to infobox with citations for info which appeared more specific than that offered by IMDB (e.g. “84 minutes” instead of “2 hours”)
  • Removed inline citation from synopsis section as the film is considered the source
  • Renamed Reappraisal to Themes, per MOS:FILM—thank you, I was not certain about this
  • Added “scholar” to Bernstein to establish expertise
  • Moved \{\{CinemaofIsrael\}\} to the very bottom of the page
  • I had already tagged the Talk page with \{\{CinemaofIsrael\}\} and a bot added a banner noting it was also of interest to WP:FILM
Thank you for the tips and I understand that style can sometimes seem confusing. You mentioned a film critic review would aid the case for notability, and the draft does seem to be missing something in-depth about how the film was received by contemporaries which indicates the motivation for the awards. You also mentioned that production details could also improve notability—such as revenue generated, maybe?
Thank you so much for offering to find info in your library database. I am looking forward to what you might find.
HussainHx (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @HussainHx:!
I took a look at the updated draft. It looks great! Nice work!
Some simple notes.
  • The info box should be the first thing in the source view. The text will auto-correct around it.
  • A little different wording on the Venice fact "was screened in competition at" Films aren't nominated for a Golden Lion at Venice, every film in competition is up for the award.
And:
I found two scholarly sources you can add! (More than enough to make this film notable to any reviewer!)
If you can’t get access to the journals yourself. I wrote up a little bit (I would add it to the draft myself (and I can if you want me to), but if this is your first film article I think It’s fun for you to have done it all your self and you can always copy any bits of mine you want)

My write up:
This film is part of the “Zionist realism” filmmaking movement.[cite 2] This film making style, as as shown in this film, emphasizes the group over the family and over the individual. [ cite 2] It also re-enforces images of the strong masculine Jewish settler, in contrast with the images of passive “Diaspora Jews” and “effeminate images of Holocaust survivors”.[ cite 1]

This is super interesting. Films are so fascinating and great cause the are all about constructing images of ourselves and making meaning. And this seems to be part of a whole film movement at the time, really interesting! This was a great film choice to write about I'm glad it will (hopefully) soon be added to Wikipedia!

Source 1: Steir-Livny, L. (2019). Mizrahi jews and holocaust survivors in 1950s israeli cinema: A revised outlook. Shofar, 37(2), 1-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2019.0025 Steir-Livny, Liat.  Shofar; West Lafayette Vol. 37, Iss. 2, (Summer 2019)

Source 2: Ne'eman, Judd (1999) The Death Mask of the Moderns: A Genealogy of New Sensibility Cinema in Israel.  Israel Studies; Bloomington Vol. 4, Iss. 1, (Mar 31, 1999): 100. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/death-mask-moderns-genealogy-new-sensibility/docview/195258690/se-2

Final thoughts, I think with the addition of these 2 sources this page will be approved! Let me know how it goes, or if you want me to take a final look, or if you have any other questions about anything in the future.
Great work & Happy Editing! — SquawkGuard (talk) 01:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. I pulled and summarized sources and submitted for review. I really appreciate your guidance on this draft. It was kind of you to share your knowledge. HussainHx (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HussainHx: You're welcome! I'm happy I could help! Hopefully this will be approved and you'll have your first Film Wikipedia page under your belt! — SquawkGuard (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Destubathon runs until the 16th of July

[edit]

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for 64th Locarno Film Festival

[edit]

On 24 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 64th Locarno Film Festival, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that director Abel Ferrara "delayed" the 64th Locarno Film Festival by singing rock and roll songs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/64th Locarno Film Festival. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 64th Locarno Film Festival), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Hi SquawkGuard, just wanted to say hi because our usernames are so similar ;) Feel free to hit me up if you ever want to collaborate on something aviation-related. Best, Squawk7700 (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Squawk7700: Thanks for the cookie and for saying hi! I'm happy that my little joke name lands (pun intended) with fellow aviators!
I’ll keep you in mind for future aviation collabs and ping me if you want help on anything yourself! And I now know who to call if there is ever a Wikipedia Aviation emergency ;) – SquawkGuard (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
213 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Television in the Philippines (talk) Add sources
159 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Golden Age of Mexican Cinema (talk) Add sources
57 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ariana Television Network (talk) Add sources
56 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Dominick Argento (talk) Add sources
56 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Varèse Sarabande albums discography (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C The Fever (2019 film) (talk) Add sources
294 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Songs from Les Misérables (talk) Cleanup
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C 69th Locarno Film Festival (talk) Cleanup
2,059 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Barbiturate (talk) Cleanup
468 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Denis Ménochet (talk) Expand
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Anthony Meindl (talk) Expand
109,556 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Jimmy Kimmel (talk) Expand
181 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Superbook (1981 TV series) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C The Generators (talk) Unencyclopaedic
172 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Killing of Sean Bell (talk) Unencyclopaedic
111 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C While loop (talk) Merge
288 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Gaza–Israel barrier (talk) Merge
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Centripetalism (talk) Merge
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Warszawskie Towarzystwo Łyżwiarskie (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Eliane Raheb (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Elizabeth Washburn Wright (talk) Wikify
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ari Chambers (talk) Orphan
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Sushi Ramen Riku (talk) Orphan
16 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Robert Rankin (photographer) (talk) Orphan
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sadaf Asgari (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pyrenacantha (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Higelin et Areski (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Leopard of Honour (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Andrea Štaka (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Minnesota Senate, District 19 (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, SquawkGuard. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "No Place Like Home".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]