User talk:RovingPersonalityConstruct

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

H/PJ-26 76 mm naval gun WP:OR

I saw your post on Nafis Fuad Ayon's talk page, and it reminded me of a similar case of WP:OR/WP:SYNTH at Shenyang J-35 (see this discussion). I think a pattern is beginning to emerge. - ZLEA _T\^C 07:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ZLEA: they certainly seem to have difficulties - of some sort, degree, or another - with VERIFY, RS, and CITE. I'm keeping an eye on what comes out next from their [[|User:Nafis Fuad Ayon/sandbox|sandbox]]; it's looking familiarly lackluster at the moment. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 22:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Report

2 dudes are edit warring on the J-35 page. Thought that it may be of interest for you. KashanAbbas (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'Operational History' section I began to add for the Type 055 destroyer.

Hello

I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the Type 055 destroyer page. Was it because it lacked source citation? If I cite sources for my inputs, would you allow the 'Operational History' section to stay?

Most every wikipedia page on military equipment have sections for 'Operational History', so I thought that the Type 055 should do as well.

--Definitelyfrank (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Definitelyfrank (talk) 09:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did remove it because of the lack of verification. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Evader at Paramount leader?

Guy that keeps editing the dates appears to have done it again. This the same guy? Admanny (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect so. Good catch. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete an edit without legitimate basis

Why did you delete my edit on HQ-9? If you googled, you could find ten more source. You could add them instead of deleting the whole edit and waste my time. But I can see from your edits that you are online-fighter rather an editor. Obsessed by your political views than Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did provide the rationale in my edit comment (see the links to the discussions of the sources your used on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.) I. general, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar. You better stop editing based on your political agenda and seek the truth. People like you are everything wrong with this platform. Don't waste other editors time by baseless and ridiculous reasons. You and I both know why you deleted my edit. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added another source and you deleted that one as well. This alone shows you don't care about the source but you have a content. How you are a confirmed editor? Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neither source is reliable, as previously discussed on RSN (linked to in my edit comments); you are required to provide reliable sources for your edits (WP:BURDEN.) You may also be interested in Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, given your earlier comment. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both sources are reliable and you are taking absolute nonsense. Both sources are well known military sources and there are hundreds of sources reporting the news. There is a video of the missile system in Baki as well. I will report you. I am wondering how you are a confirmed editor while all you do is childish edit wars. I will ask my mentor to deal with you. You are definitely a huge waste of time for everyone one. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]