User talk:PositivelyUncertain
Welcome to Wikipedia!!
[edit]Hi PositivelyUncertain! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Easternsahara (talk) 00:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I very much appreciate the welcome :) PositivelyUncertain (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Raladic (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Raladic. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Gender-critical feminism. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article, even if the content is negative or offensive in nature. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 04:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- For anyone wondering, the dispute here is not about censoring offensive content...it's about a quote making bold claims that don't appear elsewhere in the article [1]PositivelyUncertain (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Military–industrial complex#Connotations".The discussion is about the topic Military–industrial complex.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!