User talk:Number 57

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 1.

Discussion

Hi! We started on the wrong foot. I would be very thankful if we could have a fruitful discussion where we can discuss facts instead of you trying to block me. Let's discuss facts, instead of refusing to take in my arguments. You wrote that my RFC is bias, but how? Bias in favour of whom? TheUzbek (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment here (So why do you support a correct title here, and oppose it when I start an RFC?), I said exactly the same thing in the RfC (An alternative (already allowed in the naming convention) would be to use the name of the legislature, e.g. 2019 North Korean Supreme People's Assembly election.). However, these titles are generally used for subnational elections rather than national ones. I still don't really see the issue with 'parliamentary' and I think you are getting too much into semantics. Number 5 7 23:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about 2019 North Korean supreme state organ of power election? That would keep the structure, and be most factually correct, right?

If you feel I am disruptive, sorry. But I do make greats edits to Wikipedia as well. The articles Supreme state organ of power, unified power, communist state constitution, 12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam and Presidency of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, I believe, is proof of that. I am a bit hot headed, but I am only trying to improve WP's coverage. I believe I am succeeding in that. TheUzbek (talk) 06:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2019 North Korean supreme state organ of power election does not read like a serious article title and a clear failure of WP:CONCISE. Number 5 7 15:17, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is that less concise than legislative? All communist states have supreme state organs of power. Strange position, and again taken without any interest in actually taking in the position of another user. TheUzbek (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not undo the constructive edit.

You are designating that adding native names of Israeli politicians at the infoboxes "unnecessary", but it is necessary.

You are seeing that that's unnecessary but it's necessary in general and even it's not, it's better that adding native names on that infoboxes.

Please do not disrupt the Wikipedia. 2A00:1D34:412:1001:6591:C3BE:C42:54E1 (talk) 11:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]