User talk:Fancy Refrigerator
| This is Fancy Refrigerator's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Regarding Alta (company) move to Draft
[edit]Hello, I saw that you moved Alta (company) to Draft on the basis of notability concerns. I’ve restored it to mainspace because the article meets multiple policies and guidelines:
• WP:GNG – The subject has significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, including *The Wall Street Journal*, *Business Insider*, and *Fortune*. These are independent secondary sources that provide more than trivial mention. • WP:CORP – Coverage in major business publications satisfies the notability criteria for companies, going beyond routine funding notices. • WP:RS – All high-profile sources cited (WSJ, BI, Fortune) are considered reliable, and the article also includes industry media for breadth. • WP:NPOV – The article is written in neutral, encyclopedic tone. Company-provided content is attributed and balanced with independent coverage.
I plan to continue expanding the article with further independent sources, but I believe the existing references already establish that the subject passes notability guidelines. Thank you for your review and for any further feedback. TeamNZer (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- @TeamNZer. I did not move your page to draft space. @Cameremote did that. I reverted your copy and paste move because that was not the proper way to move a page. Doing so created two identical pages with separate history (which would require a history merge). Please familiarize yourself with WP:Moving a page. Also, I encourage you to go through WP:Articles for creation. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Fancy Refrigerator Thanks for clarifying, and I understand now why my copy-paste move was reverted. I’ll review WP:Moving a page to avoid that mistake again. My main focus has been on improving the Alta (company) article and ensuring it meets notability under WP:GNG and WP:CORP with independent sources like WSJ, Business Insider, and Fortune. I’ll continue to work on strengthening it with further independent coverage. Appreciate the guidance. TeamNZer (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Fancy Refrigerator, this editor has COI and LLM use problem. Their first article on Wikipedia was flagged for LLM and COI and was sent to AFD. See the discussion here. Instead of sending their second article to AFD, i decided to draftify so they can work better on it and resubmit to AFC. Cameremote (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Fancy Refrigerator Thanks for clarifying, and I understand now why my copy-paste move was reverted. I’ll review WP:Moving a page to avoid that mistake again. My main focus has been on improving the Alta (company) article and ensuring it meets notability under WP:GNG and WP:CORP with independent sources like WSJ, Business Insider, and Fortune. I’ll continue to work on strengthening it with further independent coverage. Appreciate the guidance. TeamNZer (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello Fancy Refrigerator. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vistogram, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Software is not covered by A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Draftifying
[edit]Hello, just a quick note - per WP:DRAFTNO if an author objects to a page being draftified (i.e. by moving it back to mainspace) it shouldn't be re-draftified - even if it is really really bad. I know that might seem silly but the best thing to do at that point is either tag it for improvement (or improve it if you want!), or if you don't think that'll help, take it to AfD. Repeatedly re-draftifying is effectively a very slow edit war and it's best to just avoid it. Thanks for the work patrolling :) CoconutOctopus talk 12:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I note it's a COI issue - in which case you certainly have more leeway but on a personal level I'd avoid it just to keep myself right. CoconutOctopus talk 12:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Community Fibre
[edit]Hello Fancy Refrigerator. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Community Fibre, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 09:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)