Jump to content

User talk:Davidoskky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your contributions to De Novo Drug Design Algorithms. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 15:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I can add sources. There's not much to reference anyway: the information is directly sourced from wikidata except for the introductory paragraph.The whole page is meant to be a long list, probably a few hundred entries. I will not write down the complete list all at once, but rather improve it iteratively.
The page is not much different from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_design_software which also has no sources. Davidoskky (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources 1, 3 and 4 are all cited as if they're the same source, yet all point to different papers (and none is dated 1975); please correct the citations. Also, where is the information in the 'List of Algorithms' section coming from?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @DoubleGrazing, sorry for wasting your time. It was my fault for not actually checking the article metadata. The DOI was actually correct for all the articles, I had used the template importer but apparently it does not work on short DOIs. I have now used the correct articles and checked that the metadata is in fact correct. I have checked those De Novo pages, none of them covers de novo small molecule design and as such none of them overlaps with this topic. It would make sense to list this page into that one. Moreover, this is meant to be more of a specialized page rather than a "De Novo Drug Design" page which may be a bit more oriented towards the general public. All the information in 'List of Algorithms' is coming directly from wikidata. I do not know if this is the best approach, my idea is to later use wikidata to connect other relevant information such as code repository for those algorithms. The list is not complete, but I have the intention to gradually add entries throughout the following months. I did not add any source for those algorithms as the DOI is inside the table, and that references the original publication where the algorithm was presented. I assume anybody reading such a technical page should know how to find an article by searching it by DOI. I added a human friendly name for each algorithm, it is either the name given to the algorithm in the paper or the surnames of first and last author. Also, if you know more than me regarding wikidata, could you provide guidance about how I could connect information about the algorithm/software itself to those publication entries or direct me to someone who may know how to do it? Thank you Davidoskky (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Davidoskky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Molecular Editor Software

[edit]

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. I have looked into the issue you raise but I do not think I can help you. I think it is quite correct for the material to be removed until it has a Wikipedia article. However the material may not be important enough for a Wikipedia article. See if you can find good references to support a Wikipedia article and then try to create an article. Bduke (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MolView (January 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
molview.org is not a reliable, independent source and cannot establish the notability of the subject. The second and third refs are primary as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 02:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: De Novo Drug Design Algorithms has been accepted

[edit]
De Novo Drug Design Algorithms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MolView

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Davidoskky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MolView, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MolView

[edit]

Hello, Davidoskky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "MolView".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]