User talk:DangLeBaThinh

Welcome!

Hi DangLeBaThinh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 13:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm Wikishovel. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nokia 110, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nokia 110, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DangLeBaThinh! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Nokia 111. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Nokia 111, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. If you'd like to continue creating an article at Nokia 111Nokia 111, I would recommend that you first establish notability for the subject, and then follow the guidelines at the proper page. Thank you. Shield ^{\\ |T| - |C| \\} 08:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Nokia 6216 classic. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nokia 6216 classic. sk satsuma 14:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Nokia 111, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1ee ^talk 11:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DangLeBaThinh, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as NokiaColletion (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glossary of 2010s slang

A tag has been placed on Glossary of 2010s slang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wikishovel (talk) 13:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DangLeBaThinh, can you please come over to ANI to address the concerns raised about your editing? This is really important.

To go straight to the thread, please click here. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glossary of 2010s slang

A tag has been placed on Glossary of 2010s slang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]