User talk:CycleSortSupreme

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

August 2025

Your recent editing history at C (programming language) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly changing content—in a back-and-forth fashion—back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this stage is to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand, not to engage in edit-warring. Wikipedia provides a page that details how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I understand you want to say this, but please be aware of the 3 revert rule as you will be blocked from editing if you breach it. As several editors have said, you need to discuss on the article talk page. Edit warring never ends well. You clearly want to contribute here, and you are welcome - but please note that pages can only be written by consensus. I suggest you self revert your latest reversion of this material and discuss on the talk page to find consensus for an edit we can all agree with. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hello! I noticed you recently made an edit at Python (programming language) and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. That said, this change was definitely an improvement, so thank you. — W.andrea (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not mean to falsely mark an edit as minor. CycleSortSupreme (talk) 03:34, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! This verbiage trips up a lot of people. Personally, I might prefer if we changed it to something more like "trivial edit". And just to be clear, Wikipedia has a guideline Assume good faith including Assume no clue, so don't worry about getting in trouble for lying or anything like that :) — W.andrea (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]