User talk:Cubingx

July 2025

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Crassispira luctuosa have been removed because the citation you added was to another Wikipedia article or an external wiki. As discussed at our policies on circular sourcing and self-published sources, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a better reference, perhaps from the article you originally cited. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 14:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, understood. Cubingx (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tropidiina has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropidiina. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for accepting my article! Cubingx (talk) 16:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropidiina has been accepted

Tropidiina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tropidiina

Please note the changes I have made to this article, particularly the ones you've reverted and I've restored. These are how we do things, per policies, common practices, or the manual of style. Please don't revert them. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, but please do tell me on my talk page or on the article's talk page if you are making major edits to an article I create. Cubingx (talk) 20:41, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, on the Tropidiina page, I find it neccesseary to explain that tropidia scita is part of tropidiina Cubingx (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply explaining whether you agree Cubingx (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. We don't do that for species within the subject taxa. If the species is outside of the subject taxa (for instance a host to a parasite) we would indicate the relationship to the subject taxa. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calcaretropidia has been accepted

Calcaretropidia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sk satsuma 11:20, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Suwałki Airport

The page Suwałki Airport has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suwałki Airport has been accepted

Suwałki Airport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]