User talk:BasselHarfouch

Welcome!

Hello, BasselHarfouch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shiites Against War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiites Against War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiites Against War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taharror for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taharror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taharror until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 14:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Unit 121 (Hezbollah)

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is How_do_we_handle_Israel_Palestine_new_articles_created_by_non_ECP_editors_nowadays%3F. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hussein al-Khalil and Unit 900

Hello Bassel, I was able to revive both of these articles after the admins deleted them because you are not an extended confirmed user (made at least 500 edits) which I know kteer sa2eeleh. I made a couple of amendments to them but found no real issues with them my self. You can continue adding anymore info if you'd like. If this happens again you can ask me for help in my talk page. Prodrummer619 (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be very clear, you can not edit those articles at this time. Prodrummer619 is mistaken. You may not edit in that subject area until you have extended-confirmed status. --Yamla (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help Habibi, i appreciate it BasselHarfouch (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

You must stop editing around subjects related to the Arab-Israeli war, even once this block expires. You've been warned repeatedly about this. Please consider this short block your final warning. --Yamla (talk) 11:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Mohamed Kharroubi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ali Mohamed Kharroubi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hanin Sayyed moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hanin Sayyed. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Add inline citations please. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that, i hope to find more sources soon for this article. BasselHarfouch (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Beirut attack on UN convoy

I think that the article you made should be renamed to 2025 Beirut riots. The attack on the convoy was just a part of it and the article could then be expanded to mention other incidents. What do you think? Prodrummer619 (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the 2025 Beirut attack on the UN convoy is notable since UN soldiers were injured and it adds up to the 2022 incident. Having said that, I agree that also the Hezbollah riots are notable. Maybe we should have an article for each one? Thank you for contacting me. BasselHarfouch (talk) 09:20, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BasselHarfouch The Lebanese Army just said that they endured 23 injuries themselves from the riots (X). I don't think the UN attack is notable on its own now. So I think it should be changed to 2025 Beirut riots. Should I proceed with the change? Prodrummer619 (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i can see your point, these Hezbollah riots have extended longer than just the one single attack on the UN convoy, BasselHarfouch (talk) 08:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unit 121, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absentia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counterterrorism in Germany

A tag has been placed on Category:Counterterrorism in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counterterrorism in Spain

A tag has been placed on Category:Counterterrorism in Spain indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Counterterrorism in Germany has been nominated for deletion

Category:Counterterrorism in Germany has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Counterterrorism in Spain has been nominated for deletion

Category:Counterterrorism in Spain has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hezbollah drone smuggling investigation (2024–2025) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hezbollah drone smuggling investigation (2024–2025) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hezbollah drone smuggling investigation (2024–2025) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 14:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi BasselHarfouch. Thank you for your work on Unit 910. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your complement. BasselHarfouch (talk) 06:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Port of Shahid Rajaee explosion

On 27 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Port of Shahid Rajaee explosion, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 19:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI tags in URLs

Hey, I've noticed that many of the URLs in citations that you added end in "?utm_source=chatgpt.com", which is usually appended to links that ChatGPT generates. So my question is: do you use ChatGPT to search for sources? Laura240406 (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Yes, i was looking for information and used the Chatgpt to find inforamtion, i checked the links & information manually, before using the links. Thanks for contacting me. BasselHarfouch (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries I just noticed it since I'm using this tool and it marks those links as bright yellow and makes some articles light up like a christmas tree Laura240406 (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marry Christmas :) BasselHarfouch (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nasser Unit moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nasser Unit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Sources provided are of poor quality, the only sources which even mention the unit by name are from a think tank with an explicit project they are pushing.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Mohamed Kharroubi (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no suitable sources to indicate that the is anything other than a WP:ROTM suspected criminal

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Mohamed Kharroubi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BasselHarfouch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Abo Yemen. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Houthis that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 05:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I looked at the page. all my comments are there, written in a polite and respectful manner. So i am not really sure why you wrote this messege. BasselHarfouch (talk) 06:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fact is you simply ignore the fact, you are mostly mistaken most of the time and just keep pushing you own opinion, if not to say, agenda doesn't sound too civil 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is stating facts, nothimg more. BasselHarfouch (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok just to make sure, you're saying that you see nothing wrong in saying that @Paprikaiser is pushing their own opinions/agenda here? 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read his comments again, he is constantly using and i quote: "in my view", "i". "My point", "My concern", "In my opinion".

All i quoted, are words and phrases @Paprikaiser used on the Talk page, so i did nothing wrong. BasselHarfouch (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Ibrahim Bazzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Ibrahim Bazzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ibrahim Bazzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2025 Isfahan explosion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Isfahan explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Isfahan explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2025 Iran–European nuclear talks

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Iran–European nuclear talks, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:40, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

minor

Please read wp:minor. Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hanin Sayyed

Hello, BasselHarfouch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hanin Sayyed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to Hanin Sayyed, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Cyfraw

Hello, BasselHarfouch. You have new messages at Talk:Iranian external operations.
Message added 17:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cyrfaw (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 2025 Wadi Zibqin explosion

Hello BasselHarfouch, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2025 Wadi Zibqin explosion, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Wadi Zibqin explosion.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Storm Adam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Storm Adam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm Adam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mgp28 (talk) 13:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ali Mohamed Kharroubi

Hello, BasselHarfouch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ali Mohamed Kharroubi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nasser Unit

Hello, BasselHarfouch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nasser Unit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

simpleflying

A courtesy note to let you know that simpleflying.com is not a reliable source so should not be used - see WP:SIMPLEFLYING. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your comment. Good to learn that BasselHarfouch (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Beirut One Conference

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Beirut One Conference, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beirut One Conference

Hello, I'm Jay8g. An edit that you recently made to Beirut One Conference seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay8g [V•T•E] 09:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]