User talk:AFeatherlessBipehead

Hello AFeatherlessBipehead! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Masterhatch (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Nomination of Powerking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Powerking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerking (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mega Force moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mega Force. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 19:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mega Force

Hello, AFeatherlessBipehead. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mega Force, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AFeatherlessBipehead. Thank you for your work on August Nelson. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AFeatherlessBipehead. Thank you for your work on Nikolai Tirkkonen. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article in English. However, it does seems to be an unacknowledged translation of the Finnish article. Note that translations need to acknowledged in the first edit that creates the page; see Help:Translation. Also, it seems that Nikolai is notable only because of the business; thus, one page for the business enterprise, where all family members can be discussed, would probably be a better idea. However, given that this doesn't exist, having this page is reasonable.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from no:Ole Bie to Ole Bie. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mega Force

Hello, AFeatherlessBipehead. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mega Force".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kecamatan Juwana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kecamatan Juwana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lund University Hospital moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lund University Hospital. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY. Probably the best thing would be to expand the existing Skåne University Hospital with a history section.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPCRIME

Hello, I have had to remove some of your contributions to Emporia (shopping mall) as they contained information breaching our rules around the biographies of living persons policy. Specifically, names of alleged perpetrators of crimes, especially minors, should not be included on Wikipedia unless widely reported in reliable sources and with community consensus. CoconutOctopus talk 17:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I want to emphasize this warning that CoconutOctopus left. I have had to suppress a good many edits that you made, because you added serious allegations about non-public individuals with unacceptable sources, and sometimes with no sources in support at all. For clarity, for Wikipedia to even consider including such an allegation, it must come from a reliable, secondary source. No tabloids, no police reports, certainly no social media or search result aggregators. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Eslöv school stabbing) for BLP violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 21:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AFeatherlessBipehead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request to be unblocked, I did not realize that what I did went against BLP. I likely will not edit this page much more anyway, I would just like to be unblocked. Thank You.

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you now understand WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME. Yamla (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AFeatherlessBipehead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand now that my edits to the Eslöv school stabbing article violated Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy, particularly the part about avoiding unsourced or poorly sourced material about living individuals. I’ve read through WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME carefully.

I now understand that we must not name or imply the identity of living persons accused of crimes unless the information is supported by reliable, published sources and the person has been convicted. I also recognize that any speculation, original research, or mention of non-public individuals can cause harm and is not acceptable on Wikipedia.

I apologize for my earlier mistake. If unblocked, I will follow all BLP-related policies closely and avoid editing sensitive topics unless I’m sure I have high-quality, reliable sources. I’ll also ask for help at the Teahouse or relevant noticeboards if I’m unsure about policy in the future.

Thank you for considering my request.

Accept reason:

Per unblock condition to refrain from editing or discussing Eslöv school stabbing. Please note that this is a formal unblock condition, and violation may lead to reinstatement of the block or the block being expanded to sitewide. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:45, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are only blocked from a single article, is there a particular reason you need access to that article? 331dot (talk) 08:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in editing the article, I am requesting an unblock because I cannot acces the wikipedia library while I have an active block. AFeatherlessBipehead 13:24, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Can I please ask if you used AI/LLM to write your appeal for you? It's used all the usual phrases and looks almost identical to the other AI/LLM appeals.

This might explain why you haven't had a response yet, since it doesn't stand out from all the other AI/LLM generated requests we get on a daily basis. They don't attract attention because a person who hasn't bothered to write the appeal themselves is unlikely to have read the guidelines provided or have a true understanding of what went wrong & how to avoid it in future (in general, OFC this isn't a hard rule).

I don't know for definite whether you did use AI/LLM or just saw someone else use it and copied their wording, so I'm making an educated guess as someone who spends a lot of time helping out on unblock requests. Apologies if I've got any of that wrong.

Please see Wikipedia:NICETRY for more info on how AI/LLM requests are considered.

To show an admin that you understand why you were blocked and how to avoid it in future, could you take one of the edits that led to your block and explain how it violated policy? Then can you please explain how you would approach that specific edit/subject differently in future? Do this exercisein your own words, that part is incredibly important! Blue Sonnet (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no I did not use a LLM to write it. The edits I made have been suppressed so I don't even know how I could demonstrate any of the edits. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I asked because it looks a lot like these. Blue Sonnet (talk) 08:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I get it. I might have used a little too much soft speak lol AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 08:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the only issue is Wikipedia Library access, if the block were lifted, would you agree to refrain from any further editing of Eslöv school stabbing? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:09, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes absolutely, I really did not mean any harm. Could I still discuss on the talk page of the article to suggest any improvements? AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to stay away from it altogether for a while. There are plenty of other articles to work on, and once you've gained some more experience, you could ask to have that lifted later if you want to return to it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, so am I getting unblocked? AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kecamatan Juwana

Hello, AFeatherlessBipehead. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kecamatan Juwana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Southport stabbings

I've undone your additions to the infobox on this page because they aren't mentioned in the article body: see WP:INFOBOXES. In addition, the sources your provided didn't support the motivations you included, and there has already been discussion on the article talk page about including the exact style of knife. Orange sticker (talk) 11:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aha okay sorry, I didn't see that. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 11:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hi AFeatherlessBipehead! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Viertola school shooting. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Viertola school shooting, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Zzz plant (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]