User talk:72.180.111.79

April 2025

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Brad Schimel. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Pbritti (talk) 19:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That wasn't an "attack". If so, who (or what) was I attacking. Clearly, or maybe not so clear to you, it was a pretty good characterization of my real time reaction to the deficits of the Article. Should have been perfectly clear. Is English your first language?72.180.111.79 (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, but tirades like that tend to be a bit impenetrable. Your real-time reaction, sans any actionable proposals for improving the article, was deeply unproductive. Any further abrasive conduct will likely result in a block. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you share my sentiments? It's not "abrasive" to accurately characterize one's honest reaction to a poorly written Article.72.180.111.79 (talk) 03:17, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confrontational talk page comments

Hi, I'm Anerdw. I've noticed that you've left several talk page comments that are quite confrontational in tone, including at Talk:Lavrentiy Beria, Talk:John A. Chapman, and Talk:Killing of Jocelyn Nungaray.

Please be be aware that civility is one of Wikipedia's Five Pillars and is always expected when interacting with other users. It is also important to assume good faith as a default. Comments that accuse Wikipedians of "censorship" or use all/alternating caps tend to instigate arguments, not promote collaboration. That is particularly true when they are the first comments in a brand-new topic and thus help set the tone for the remainder of the discussion.

Further incivility may result in a block as a preventative measure. Thank you. Anerdw (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of what's expected, and it's something I do need to work on. Also I have taken your point that the emotional tone of the 1st comment can easily start a cascade of unnecessary negativity. I get mad at the Article I'm reading, and I fire-off without thinking.72.180.111.79 (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Pluot for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:TALK, a talk page comment should propose a constructive change to the article, accompanied by a WP:RS source. You could do your own research to find if pluot seeds will grow, then provide the sentence with a good source. that would make a useful addition to the article.

It seems you already have a start on a possible answer, although a commercial nursery is not a WP:RS source. Zefr (talk) 21:49, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without your IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

If you have any questions at all, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:03, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Cauliflower have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. tony 00:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:The Founder are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Lynch 44 23:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.