User talk:Iskandar323

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 2.

This user participates in
WikiProject Palestine.

السلام-שלום

This user participates in WP:IPCOLL.

This user participates in WikiProject Islam.

This user participates in
WikiProject Mongols.

Contributions

Whaling in the Faroe Islands (DYK) Al-Wishah fi Fawa'id al-Nikah (DYK) Birzeit Brewery Bisan Center for Research and Development Genghis Khan Ghadir Khumm Mohammad El Halabi Beer in Palestine Burial place of Genghis Khan Concubinage (law) Ermenek Grand Mosque Iplikçi Mosque (DYK) Maizbhandari (DYK) Mattanza Ongoing Nakba (DYK) Tahsin Yazıcı (scholar) Tomb of Genghis Khan Wives of Genghis Khan Where Heaven and Earth Meet (DYK) Union of Palestinian Women's Committees Zdravka Matišić List of companies operating in West Bank settlements List of Middle Eastern dishes List of Turkish Grand Mosques

You have no enemies, you say? Alas, my friend, the boast is poor. He who has mingled in the fray of duty that the brave endure, must have made foes. If you have none, small is the work that you have done. You’ve hit no traitor on the hip. You’ve dashed no cup from perjured lip. You’ve never turned the wrong to right. You’ve been a coward in the fight. ~ CM

Category:Targeted killing by Israel has been nominated for renaming

Category:Targeted killing by Israel has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QalasQalas (talk) 10:40, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't know

You're mentioned in media again:[1] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation

Hello. This edit appears to be a topic ban violation broadly construed, as it links from Journal of Genocide Research to A. Dirk Moses, where both articles touch on ARBPIA. Please self revert. Nehushtani (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Nehushtani: That's not how it works. If the article is wholly about ARBPIA, then any edit to it falls under the ban. If the article isn't, then the ban covers edits that substantively pertain to ARBPIA. Journal of Genocide Research is not wholly about ARBPIA, and wikilinking an existing reference to A. Dirk Moses does not constitute any substantive reference to ARBPIA, so there is no violation here. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 10:25, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining this. Sorry I misunderstood. Nehushtani (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your technical move request

Hello Iskandar323, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 00:00, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I removed the section because there was a lot of questionable information, and I planned to redo the section and find better sources. The edit was not disruptive nor was it meant to be. Firekong1 (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Firekong1: I should have manually noted that the actual problem was that it was unexplained. In the form that the edit took, there was no way to assess it due to the lack of an edit summary. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should I remove it with an edit summary? Firekong1 (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why not improve it in situ? It's great to have a plan to improve a section, but if you're not doing that immediately, the only result is a loss of material, even if it might be questionable based on your impression. Alternatively, if you are convinced there are problems with the current sourced content, but you don't have an immediate time budget to address them, tagging the section or specific statements for the appropriate issue(s) may be a suitable interim step that would come with the added benefit of alerting readers to the need for caution and potentially drawing the attention of other editors to any issues. The latter would also be supported by starting a discussion on the talk page. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I’ll start a discussion and edit a few sentences. Firekong1 (talk) 08:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]