Jump to content

Talk:XScale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Miscellany

[edit]

Very first paragraph mentions v5TE instruction set architecture but there is no x-ref on Wiki. Would be nice to elaborate. --Todd 20:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was the StrongARM designed sololy by Digital, or was Acorn/ARM involved in the development process?


I was under the impression that it was designed as a joint venture.

Furthermore, I also thought that the XScale was quite a re-design, compared to the SA-1110. For example, unmodified StrongArm code runs about as fast on a 400Mhz XScale as the 206MHz SA-1110. (That's what they claim about the Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 vs 5600.) The XScale is, however, designed to be able to run at a much higher clock frequency. They have been hinting at new versions approaching 1GHz, consuming around 1W since 2000, but I haven't seen any hard evidence for this yet. - Popup 15:53, 2004 Feb 4 (UTC)

I thought it was Digitals version of Arms core modified to closely suit their process technology

Though ARM consulted on the design, the actual design work was done solely by Digital/DEC. SA-1 core was a grounds-up design within Digital, while SA-2 core is a grounds-up design within Intel. Dyl 14:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need to add details ofthe Intel IXP processors(network processors and backplane processors) which use an xscale core but also have various hardware acceleration units.Maybe seperate pages ? Some using the MSA architecture jointly developed between Intel and Analog devices. Analog use MSA in their blackfin dsp chips.

The IXP processors run at up to 1.2GHz. alxx 13:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The processor list is very out of date, and somewhat misleading.

  • I have begun adding information about the other processor families, but it still neds some work. Perhaps somebody with some knowledge of these chips could add more info. Judzillah 00:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date? Please give more detailed info. (Mar 25/06)

I so want to see mention of the bugginess of Intel's XScale chips. Like how the PXA250 was notable for sheer bugginess, and how the PXA255 errata falsely claimed many of those bugs were fixed; and design goofage. But I suppose that doesn't belong in the body of the article. It was a real PITA in terms of getting software to work there, though. 69.226.236.175 (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wireless MMX

[edit]

There are some differences in the XScale MMX implementation compared to IA86 MMX worth mentioning, most notably that the destination register need not be one of the source registers, ie: 


// XScale:
mm0 = mm1 + mm2;

// IA86:
mm0 = mm1;
mm0 += mm2;

MX44 12:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sale of XScale business to Marvell

[edit]

From http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20060627corp.htm it looks like the "sale of XScale business to Marvell" covers only the communications and application processor business (i.e. PXA). There's no mention of the IXP business going the same way. The way this is described in the article (and in the ARM architecture article) would suggest it is.

Clarification needed. Ptoboley 12:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I agree - the first paragraph states that just the PXA unit was sold, but then at the end of the article, it says the entire XScale unit was sold. I'm going to edit the end as the PXA is more accurate, and supply citation. Done, but I couldn't figure out how to get the citation to work. Please help. informedbanker 13:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on XScale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on XScale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XScale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Marvell-Technology-Group-PXA1088-Notebook-Processor.116944.0.html https://www.notebookcheck.net/Marvell-Armada-PXA1908-SoC-Benchmarks-and-Specs.272910.0.html https://web.archive.org/web/20100416181014/http://www.marvell.com/products/processors/applications/armada_100. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:XScale&oldid=1299182561"