Talk:Neo4j

Are the listings of board members (for instance who the CTO of neo is) really that crucial to a page about Neo4j? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.15.214 (talk) 21:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think not - doesn't really meet the relevance criteria. The page is mainly about the Neo4j-the-database, not about Neo4j Inc. (the company).

I have removed the list of board members. Ekborg (talk) 13:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this page link to Orly, the place in France? I can't find any relation 97.107.132.202 (talk) 07:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this article mention the lawsuits around Neo4j and their outcome?

Here is one source, a court decision: [1] Gnuish (talk) 18:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added some text and citations to the article about the PureThink lawsuit. Gnuish (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you added it under the "Criticisms" section? Is Neo4j winning a court-case a criticism? Surely it's the opposite of a criticism! Fig (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GNU License confusion

The Free Software Foundation is in a lawsuit against Neo4j concerning the incorrect application of the GPL (license): https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-submits-amicus-brief-in-neo4j-v-suhy That should be noted in the article, otherwise it gives readers the false implication that Neo4j is truly fully under the copy-left license (which it isn't). 47.221.130.125 (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]