Jump to content

Talk:Metaphysics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleMetaphysics is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 1, 2025.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 23, 2024Good article nomineeListed
October 30, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
January 5, 2025Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 21, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a nihilist school of metaphysics contends that tables and chairs do not exist?
Current status: Featured article

Higher-Order Metaphysics

[edit]

There are only 3 branches listed so far after meta-metaphysics got merged. There currently is no mention of higher-order metaphysics or any other formal metaphysics, yet it seems that this is what a good chunk of the field is currently working on. There are hundreds of peer-reviewed papers on Google Scholar with "higher-order metaphysics" in the title, and books by publishers such as Springer on the topic. Worth adding per WP:DUE? Grammophone minds (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grammophone minds and thanks for the suggestion. I checked a few overview sources on metaphysics (Carroll & Markosian 2010, Koons & Pickavance 2015, Loux & Crisp 2017, and Rea 2021): none of them mention higher-order metaphysics. From what I can tell, this seems to be a relatively recently conceived approach to metaphysics rather than one of the established main branches. I added a short footnote to mention it in relation to logic, but this wide overview article may not be the right place for a more in-depth discussion of this specific approach. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Epistemology is part of metaphysics: it seeks the correct interpretation of physics

[edit]

Please include epistemology in the definition of metaphysics because physics itself doesn't answer via experiment all interpretations. // see: Oxford Languages: epistemology: the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion. // Alain Aspect mentions epistemology in physics. And this is metaphysical because it's about interpretations. Please also inform Oxford Languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-35055-21 (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the standard characterization, metaphysics and epistemology are two distinct branches of philosophy, so claiming that epistemology is a subfield of metaphysics would be misleading. The topics of those two branches overlap in several ways. This is addressed, for example, in the sections "Methodology" and "Criticism". Phlsph7 (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]