Talk:High-commitment management

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Major rework

Hi,

This needs to be majorly reworked, as it is more of a list of benifits about this type of management versus an informational article Mangoflies (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree. Especially the section on Google — it feels like an essay promoting Google's style rather than a case-study. GaffTape (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History

The history section requires major changes. I do not know about management, however the article reads like a list of benefits in a very conclussive way, doesn't show a clear history for it, for example:

No clear origin for high commitment management in its historical context.
Only mentions few sources of study.
Research timeline only follows from 1920s to 1970s.
Only mentions dates generally.

Cloudbongee (talk) 01:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree, the first part doesn't show enough history in my opinion. HiddenLocksmith (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]