Talk:errno.h

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

C/C++ High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article falls within the scope of C.

"EPIPE" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect EPIPE. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment

This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)404[reply]

Improvements

I removed the uncited statement that error codes 41 and 58 were not part of the POSIX standard as POSIX itself does not define specific error codes. 41 is associated with ELNRG and appears in GNU, RUST, Python and Oracle documentation but not in the latest POSIX documentation. It may be useful to verify each of the listed names are part of the POSIX standard and mark (but not remove) any that do not appear using https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/. There is no requirement other than the title of the section that only POSIX codes need to be listed.

The description of each of the error codes is rather terse and appears to be copied from the list of error codes in the reference. Better explanations could be provided by consulting related man pages and other documentation such as Stevens and Rago and other systems programming references. GelvinM (talk) 16:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]