Talk:Dialectical logic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dialectical logic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

This page should be marked as a stub

Very low quantity of information and analysis Niljana (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i agree with Nilijana's comment. the page seems very lackluster in terms of analysis or even rigorous fact checking. for example in the section adressing stalin's "Marxism And Problems Of Linguistics" the author used Herbert Marcuse's "Soviet Marxism : A Critical analysis" as a source for Stalin supposedly stating that formal logic had no class character. Upon verification of the primary source, which in this case would be Stalin's work, there is no mention of formal logic at all. Jihalyb (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]