Talk:Computer animation

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2023/November;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer animation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Animation: Computer Top‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Computer graphics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Caprockranger (talk · contribs) / Computer animation Computer animation This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)

This article is currently or was the subject of an educational assignment in February 2013. Further details are available here.

Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to split GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Over the next few weeks I plan to separate the topics of 3D and 2D animation into two separate categories as is noted on this article's "To-do list." I will be sure to preserve the content and particularly focus on making the article more readable and organized by allowing each sub topic to have its own section. Feel free to leave any suggestions here or questions about what I will do here. ZacZig (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely support. —theMainLogan (t•c) 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is this still happening? Some related articles that also need some work are virtual cinematography, and the Traditional animation article, which is terribly named and mixes digital 2D animation and hand-drawn cel animation. — jonas (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support They are entirely different. RuzDD (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, it's been over a year. Shall we do the split? Lililolol (talk) 04:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Not being solely a reason and not being limited to these articles, seperation between 2D and 3D CGI should be made well. RuzDD (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should we request a closure first do you think? GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asking because Wikipedia:Splitting says to close the discussion. GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind it says any user can close so I will close and perform the split. GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.