Talk:Chechnya
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chechnya article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 11, 2004. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of Ichkeria (Chechnya) was merged into Chechnya on 31 August 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
January 2024
[edit]@Mellk Regarding Akhmad Kadyrov, his description as "former Mufti" is factually correct and provides additional context about his background and influence in Chechnya. Taken directly from his page: "Akhmad-Khadzhi Abdulkhamidovich Kadyrov was a Russian politician and revolutionary who served as Chief Mufti of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria in the 1990s". Secondly, there is a lack of concrete evidence proving Kadyrov's participation in armed conflict to classify him definitively as a rebel.
The term "restored" implies a continuity of Russian control over Chechnya following the USSR's dissolution. Therefore, using "restored" inaccurately suggests a return to a previous state of Russian control which it did not have post USSR, ignoring the de-facto independence Chechnya exercised in those years. A term like "achieved" or "established" would more accurately reflect the reality that Russian control was an establishment of authority rather than a reinstatement of an uninterrupted status quo. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Saying "former rebel" is much more clearer that he switched sides. In regards to the term "restored", Chechnya declared independence in late 1991. It was part of the Russian SFSR. See for example: "Though the Republic split from the Chechno-Ingush ASSR and declared its independence from Russia in 1991, it was not until 1994 that the central government attempted to re-establish federal control over the region."[1] Mellk (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- In that case writing "former Ichkerian mufti" is appropriate to indicate he switched sides. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Are Chechens pontics or GREEKS or Romans?
[edit]answear me please are Chechens GREEKS or pontics GREEKS or Turkish people?? 2A02:85F:F863:A7FE:9404:254C:60F:BD8 (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Change Infobox
[edit]Is there an way i can change the infobox? the infobox "settlement" lacks of interesting datas and i think infobox "political division" or "dependency" would be better as there are informations addable that the current one lacks. Leofisha (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Add info to government section of the infobox
[edit]I think we should change "Parliament of the Chechen Republic" to "Parliament of the Chechen Republic under an authoritarian dictatorship", or even "under a totalitarian dictatorship", as that what it is pretty much is!
I thought I would put it here for consideration by you, so I don't waste my time making an edit that could be reverted Sickminecraft45 (talk) 10:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for investing the effort of contributing your opinion. Now the only thing you need to provide is a published, reliable, secondary source that can be cited to validate your opinion, and we can get the ball rolling. Nom de vileplume (talk) 01:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- https://neweasterneurope.eu/2024/12/15/chechnyas-instability-implications-for-russia-and-the-eu/
- https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2021-10/2021%20Chechnya%20Issue%20Update.pdf
- Are these good enough to label it as an Authoritarian Regime? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think that you should add it to the Politics section, something along the lines of "Kadyrov's government has been described as an authoritarian or totalitarian."
- These sources (the US government agency and a Polish think-tank) are not ideal, you'd want to use scholarly source. However I don't think anyone seriously doubts that Kadyrov's government is authoritarian. Alaexis¿question? 07:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- I am not sure why we are even using Template:Infobox settlement and not Template:Infobox Russian federal subject. IIRC there was an account that changed the infoboxes on the pages about the republics a couple years ago, but this was never reverted. Mellk (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- B-Class Russia articles
- Top-importance Russia articles
- Top-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russia (human geography) articles
- Human geography of Russia task force articles
- B-Class Chechnya articles
- Chechnya task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report

