Talk:Charlie Kirk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charlie Kirk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Discussions on this page may turn into heated arguments. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here.
( no personal attacks · assume good faith · be kind )

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.

Gun rights

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would it be in bad taste and possible not-neutral to point out that he had said "'I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths . . .'"? Or not?Kdammers (talk) 18:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's germane to the subject. He's said many things over the years: this quote isn't useful. fr33k man 18:35, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply