Jump to content

Talk:Bryan Singer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@Doniago: Please stop undoing my intro edit.

[edit]

There was no synthesis involved. It's pretty obvious that he hasn't been very active in Hollywood. Even if we can't say he's lacked work, we should at least say he's lacked any credits. —theMainLogan (tc) 06:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To what end? The rest of the article (specifically the filmography) will make it clear that he lacks any credits, or at least any that any Wikipedia editor felt like adding to his article. Also, I don't see how it's not synthesis to claim that Singer hasn't had any work, unless you have a source that has made that claim. Do you have such a source? DonIago (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.timesofisrael.com/disgraced-hollywood-director-bryan-singer-said-living-in-israel-planning-comeback/
https://www.avclub.com/bryan-singer-documentary-about-himself-1850512101
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/bryan-singer-documentary-sexual-assault-claims-1235634544/
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/bryan-singer-floating-doc-that-will-address-sexual-misconduct-allegations-1235508331/
...and common sense based on information the article already provides.
Seriously, does all this talk about a "comeback" sound like they're describing a guy who's been doing well in the past few years?
theMainLogan (tc) 04:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We can say (in our own words) what those sources say, but we can't use them to draw broader conclusions such as, "he hasn't been doing well" (unless a source says that); that's the very definition of original research. DonIago (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]