Jump to content

Talk:Blaise Pascal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleBlaise Pascal is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 19, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 25, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
September 12, 2011Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

images

[edit]

There are too many images, and it's making this page crowded. I say we remove the stamp image, and develop a caption for the statue image. -- Removed this passage: "Following an accident in 1654 at the Neuilly bridge where the horses plunged over the parapet but the carriage miraculously survived, Pascal abandoned mathematics and physics for philosophy and theology." Source? Pascal's turn toward religion is commonly attributed to his mystical experience of Nov. 23, 1654. Mark K. Jensen 09:47, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Found a source placing the accident in question 15 days before Pascal's mystical experience. [1] Mark K. Jensen 01:25, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)

Article Direction

[edit]

When searching for Pascal I was brought to an article about the Pascal physics unit. It seems obvious that the biography of a man should come before an article about a connotation in the mans honor, so I think it should direct here first.

Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2019

[edit]

Request: Pascal had three sibling(s) not two. He had Older sibling and she died when she was child. Her name remains unknown. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://books.google.co.id/books?id=qpmGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=pascal+is+third+child&source=bl&ots=FnMn72jFMx&sig=ACfU3U1xOKpGvBj6jDd3jo5DN-IHjYCprQ&hl=id&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-gtXSiJHmAhUKbn0KHfu8DBMQ6AEwGnoECAkQAQ I'm not sure and I'm a little bit skeptical with some sources. More: Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).http://famous-mathematicians.org/blaise-pascal/ Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://prezi.com/fmw68lwidhds/blaise-pascal/ Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~greg/calculators/pascal/About_Pascal.htmMathemaphilosophie (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – [[User:Frood| cxz\zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxe "reliable sources" shown above gave me little to no understanding as to why the original reference was inadequate. 98.53.149.206 (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also I'm not the original person who made the comment - just another passer-by who noticed the same error as the original poster did. 98.53.149.206 (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, unfortunately I forgot my account password so I can't delete it but I will be back in a few days to provide some sources. Also I'm very embarassed to share some shady and unreliable sources few years ago. Quantumaniacal (talk) 23:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pass-KAL -> pa-SKAL

[edit]

The IPA for "Pascal" in English has the /sk/ in the same syllable, while the spelling has pass-KAL, which would indicate a different pronunciation. pa-SKAL would fit the IPA better. (Similarly for the alternative pronunciations.) 142.126.175.174 (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biased, uncited opinion in Pensées section

[edit]

It reads:

"One of the Apologie's main strategies was to use the contradictory philosophies of Pyrrhonism and Stoicism, personalized by Montaigne on one hand, and Epictetus on the other, in order to bring the unbeliever to such despair and confusion that he would embrace God."

There is no citation for the claim that this 'brings the unbeliever to such despair and confusion that he would embrace God' and this has to tone of a hostile value judgment by the author. KamilBoehm25 (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]