Talk:AI bubble

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 August 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Artificial Intelligence Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Economics Low‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

NPOV

I have added the POV template to this article because it doesn't have any information about the speculation that there is no current AI bubble. ―Panamitsu (talk) 11:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was removed Arkoftwo4 (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I removed it because I wasn't sure if I was correct in adding it. ―Panamitsu (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar fixed

I fixed some of the grammar on this article because there were many typos that would be considered hard to read by a person reading this Wikipedia article TheNewOne62 (talk) 15:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't "typos", but... Anyways, unsure whether to accept the change from New Zealand English to American English, but ah hell, Wikipedia is a US-based establishment, isn't it? (Learn more please about English-language spelling reform and American and British English spelling differences if you can.) George Ho (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No we don't do that for no reason. See MOS:RETAIN. ―Panamitsu (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you're from New Zealand, but using a small country's variety of the language on an article completely unrelated to it is a bit silly. American or British English is the most convenient for an encyclopedia. Staryu★ 00:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Market correction predictions

I didn't learn until now about the term "market correction" when I watched a CNBC interview with Cathie Wood, an Ark Invest CEO. Wood said there won't be an AI bubble but rather market (or stock) correction on AI investments. Others have said the same. (Source: CNBC article) George Ho (talk) 04:32, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth it could be both. We'll just have to see. It might be worth including if you want to add it in the Opposing Views section Catboy69 (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which English variety?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Keep NZ English. MOS:RETAIN allows switching the variety of English (even if there are no strong ties to a specific country) if there is consensus to do so, but no clear consensus has been demonstrated. -- Beland (talk) 02:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shall the English variety be changed from New Zealand English to another? If so, American, British, or which other? George Ho (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would make more sense to change it to British English because NZ English is most similar to British English and also because of MOS:RETAIN. ―Panamitsu (talk) 19:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What? How does switching the variety count as MOS:RETAIN? Nixinova T ⁄ C 08:30, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't entirely "count" as MOS:RETAIN but because written New Zealand English and British English are almost identical, changing from New Zealand to British English would be much closer to following MOS:RETAIN than if we changed to American English. I guess I made my earlier comment confusing by adding the "also" which didn't make much sense. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I add the RFC tag right away then, though I already notified just two WikiProjects about this thread? --George Ho (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gang, what are we doing here? MOS:RETAIN is one of the more clear cut rules we have and it is designed specifically to save us all from spending energy on discussions like this. The article was established with New Zealand English and the topic has no strong national ties, so New Zealand English it must remain. twotwos (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certain users tried to swap from New Zealand English to American one (diff 1, diff 2), and one of users considers British and American more ~~common~~ "convenient" varieties than New Zealand (#Grammar fixed), so I started the discussion a month ago. George Ho (talk) 23:27, 24 December 2025 (UTC); edited, 23:27, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to say that despite my earlier comments, I never really wanted to change away from NZ English but it seemed that if the majority of people wanted to do so, it would make the most sense to change to British English. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.