Jump to content

Talk:2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request - change infobox

[edit]

Replace the Infobox civilian attack with some infobox relevant to military operations, because that's what this was. Jerdle (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Alaexis¿question? 19:04, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proportionality

[edit]

The Proportionality section is so unbalanced that it essentially absolves the terrorist attacker from any ethical consideration of carrying out such a brutal and indiscriminate attack. 2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:E14:20B:9267:4231 (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added a couple more opinions. Alaexis¿question? 11:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You distorted the entire section to lean even more heavily in the "it was justified" POV, the opposite of what the person you are responding to was complaining about. There is also no reason for you to so extensively cite the POV already disproportionately presented on the page by detailing their arguments at such length. I have added more POVs that say it was not proportionate and fixed the paragraphs so each POV is in the same parts. Lf8u2 (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 11 August 2025

[edit]

Description of suggested change: Remove "Land" from West Point international law institute name. Causes a dead link. Diff:

An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & Land Warfare at West Point concluded that while not all relevant facts are yet known, if Israeli officials were of the "genuine and good faith professional opinion" that most of the people impacted by the attack were lawful targets, the operation may have been legal.
+
An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & Warfare at West Point concluded that while not all relevant facts are yet known, if Israeli officials were of the "genuine and good faith professional opinion" that most of the people impacted by the attack were lawful targets, the operation may have been legal.

198.2.5.112 (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done tony 21:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 17 September 2025

[edit]

Description of suggested change: Remove the mis-cited reference "[16]" at the end of the sentence in the lead. The cited source does not support the statement. The sentence should be removed or cited accurately.

Diff:

UN human rights experts condemned the attacks as potential war crimes, stating that while some victims may not have been civilians, the indiscriminate nature of the simultaneous explosions violated international law and the right to life.[16]
+
(Remove or cite)

TheWolfWar (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citation changed. Lf8u2 (talk) 04:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]