Post-truth

Post-truth is a term used to describe situations where people's opinions are more influenced by emotions and personal beliefs than by objective facts. In such scenarios, facts become less important in shaping public opinion compared to emotional appeals.

Meaning

The term "post-truth" refers to circumstances where objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief. This means that people may accept information that aligns with their feelings or beliefs, even if it's not factually accurate.

Popularity

The term gained prominence in 2016 during significant political events like the U.S. presidential election and the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom. During these events, emotional appeals and personal beliefs often overshadowed factual information, leading to widespread discussions about the influence of emotions over facts in politics.

Social media and Internet contributions

Social media platforms allow rapid sharing of information, including false or misleading content. Algorithms often show users content that aligns with their existing beliefs, creating "echo chambers" where opposing viewpoints are less visible. This environment can make it easier for misinformation to spread and harder for people to encounter diverse perspectives.

Effects

In a post-truth environment, distinguishing between true and false information becomes challenging. This can lead to confusion, mistrust in institutions, and difficulty in making informed decisions. When emotions and personal beliefs dominate, it undermines rational debate and consensus-building in society.

Ways to address it

There are several ways to address post-truth:

Critical thinking: Encouraging individuals to question information sources and seek evidence-based conclusions
Fact-checking: Supporting organizations and tools that verify information accuracy
Media literacy: Teaching people how to identify credible news sources and recognize misinformation
Open dialogue: Promoting discussions that consider multiple viewpoints and emphasize understanding over persuasion.

References

↑ Simons, Ned (June 8, 2016). "Tory MP Sarah Wollaston Switches Sides in EU Referendum Campaign". The Huffington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2016.

[1] Simons, Ned (June 8, 2016). "Tory MP Sarah Wollaston Switches Sides in EU Referendum Campaign". The Huffington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2016.

[1]

v t e Social issues in the United States
Economy	Abusive supervision Communications Cost of living Farmers' suicides Labor Land reforms Pensions Poverty Remittances Slum Clearance Standard of living Street vendors Transport Urbanization Unemployment Widening income gap
Education	Educational inequality Higher education bubble Literacy
Environment	Conservation Climate change Natural disasters Pollution Water supply and sanitation
Family	Cohabitation Domestic violence Extended family Family planning Infertility Martial rape Nuclear family Polygamy
Children	Abortion Child abuse Child labor Child marriage Child prostitution Child trafficking Street children
Women	Acid attacks Women's health Feminism Menstrual taboo Prostitution Rape Sexism
Racism and racial inequality	Racial inequality in the United States African Americans Environmental racism Interminority racism Islamophobia Mass racial violence Native Americans Race and health Racial achievement gap Racial profiling Racial wage gap
Crime	Corruption Human trafficking Illegal immigration Organized crime prison overcrowding Prison rape Race and crime Terrorism Vigilantism Cybercrime
Health	HIV/AIDS Malnutrition Obesity Suicide
Media	Censorship Internet Films about social issues Freedom of speech Fake news Post-truth Truthiness
Discrimination	Ableism Age discrimination Caste discrimination Family responsibilities discrimination Housing discrimination Institutionalized discrimination Religious discrimination
Other issues	Colorism Extremism Gambling Plutocracy Political apathy Sexuality LGBTQ Human rights Prohibition Police brutality