Jump to content

Elective monarchy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Elective monarchies)
Part of the Politics series
Monarchy
Heraldic royal crown
Central concepts
Types
Philosophy
Philosophers
Works
Politicians
History
Polity
Administration
Related ideologies
National variants
Related topics
icon Politics portal
1764 Polish royal election

An elective monarchy is a monarchy where the ruling head is elected instead of strictly inheriting power.[1] The manner of election, the nature of candidate qualifications, and the electors vary from case to case. Historically, it was common for elective monarchies to transform into hereditary ones (whether legally or de facto) by repeated election of the previous rulers' children, or for hereditary monarchies to acquire elective or semi-elective succession laws, particularly following dynastic crises.

Evolution

[edit]

Most elected monarchies practiced hereditary succession, guaranteeing that the title and office stayed within the royal family and specifying, more or less precisely, the order of succession.[2] Many monarchies, to avoid an succession crisis, elected the next monarch when the previous one died and left no heir.[3]

Historical examples

[edit]

Europe

[edit]

Ancient Greece

[edit]

The kings of Macedon[4] and of Epirus were elected by the army, which was similar in composition to the Ecclesia of the Demos, the assembly of all free Athenian citizens. Military service often was linked with citizenship among the male members of the royal house.[citation needed]

Ancient Rome and Byzantium

[edit]

In the ancient Roman Kingdom the kings were elected by the Roman assemblies. When a king died, the senate would appoint an interrex to oversee the election for a new king.[5] Whilst given many titles (including "Augustus", i.e. "majestic") Octavian described himself as princeps senatus, or merely "first among senators". Thus he portrayed an illusion of being elected from the Senate.[6]

Great Britain

[edit]

A system of elective monarchy existed in Anglo-Saxon England (see Witenagemot).[7]

John of England was chosen as King of England by a council of nobles and royal advisors at the death of his brother, Richard I, in 1199 because the heir by strict primogeniture, Arthur of Brittany, was a child at that time.[8]

In 14th, 15th, late 17th and early 18th century England, the evolving relations between the Crown and Parliament resulted in a monarchy with both hereditary and quasi-elective elements[9] – at least as between various contenders with some dynastic claim for the throne. Henry IV of England was chosen by Parliament in 1399 to replace Richard II. Richard was childless, and the Earl of March, the next in line to the throne, was a young child at the time, so Parliament bypassed him in favour of Henry, who had led a revolt against Richard. Parliament also confirmed depositions during the Wars of the Roses, as well as Henry VIII's settlements of the crown. During the Exclusion Crisis, King Charles II strongly opposed any such idea.

Following the Glorious Revolution, Parliament enacted the Act of Succession, whose effect was to disinherit the Stuarts and replace them by the Hanoverians, whose dynastic claim was far more remote. William III and Mary II were chosen by Parliament to replace James II. (Mary was James' daughter, William was James' nephew, and William and Mary were succeeded by Mary's younger sister Anne.) Parliament passed laws in the late 17th and early 18th centuries which explicitly excluded Catholics (and thus the male descendants of James II) from the order of succession. The Succession to the Crown Act 2013, replaced male-preference primogeniture with absolute primogeniture and ended disqualification of a person who married a Roman Catholic from succession.

In Scotland, the Declaration of Arbroath of 1320 asserted the rights of the nobles to choose a king if required, which implied elective monarchy.[10] Tanistry was also the system of royal succession until King Malcolm II in the early 11th century introduced direct inheritance. The Isle of Man also used tanistry.[11]

Ireland

[edit]
Main article: Tanistry

In Ireland, from the beginning of recorded history[12] until the mid-16th/early 17th century,[13] succession was determined by an elective system based on patrilineal relationship known as tanistry.[14]

Gaul/France

[edit]

The Gallic tribes were each ruled by a rix, which can be translated as king, who were elected for terms of one year or longer. Candidates were drawn from relatives of past kings.[15]

The Frankish kingdom was at least partly elective. Merovingian kings were elected, while Carolingian kings were elected at times. In the 10th century Western Frankish royal elections switched between different lineages before settling on the Capetians.[7] Medieval France was an elective monarchy at the time of the first Capetian kings; the kings however took the habit of, during their reign, having their son elected as co-king and successor during their reigns. The election soon became a mere formality and vanished after the reign of Philip II.[16]

After declaring the throne vacant, the French Chamber of Deputies voted 229–33 to declare Louis-Philippe of France as King of the French during the July Revolution of 1830,[17] creating an elective monarchy.[18] France briefly had again a kind of elective monarchy[19] when Napoleon III was first elected President of France and then transformed himself into an Emperor.

Holy Roman Empire

[edit]
Further information: Imperial election

The Holy Roman Empire, beginning with its predecessor Eastern Francia,[7] is perhaps the best-known example of an elective monarchy. However, from 1440 to 1740, a Habsburg was always elected emperor, the throne becoming unofficially hereditary.[20] During that period, the emperor was elected from within the House of Habsburg by a small council of nobles called prince-electors. The secular electoral seats were hereditary.[21] However, spiritual electors (and other prince-(arch)bishops) were usually elected by the cathedral chapters as religious leaders, but simultaneously ruled as monarch (prince) of a territory of imperial immediacy.

Bohemia

[edit]

Since medieval times, the King of Bohemia was elected by the Estates of Lands of the Bohemian Crown. Since 1526, when Ferdinand I assumed the Bohemian Crown, it was always held by the Habsburg branch who later became Holy Roman Emperor and who expected this situation to go on indefinitely. In 1618 the Bohemians chose to exercise in practice their legal right to choose a King at their discretion, despite having already elected Ferdinand II as king, and bestowed the Bohemian Crown on Frederick V, Elector Palatine – "The Winter King". However, the Habsburgs regarded this as an act of rebellion, re-imposed their rule over Bohemia in the Battle of the White Mountain and in the aftermath abolished the Bohemian Elective Monarchy and made exclusive Habsburg rule the de jure as well as de facto situation.[22]

Hungary

[edit]

Hungary[23] was an elective monarchy until 1687. This elective right carried on for another two more decades in the Principality of Transylvania which de jure continued to belong to the Lands of the Hungarian Crown but had split from Hungary when the childless King Louis II died after the Battle of Mohács.[24]

Iberia

[edit]

Visigothic Hispania elected the king from the relatives of past kings, in accordance with the Germanic traditions.[25] In practice, the Visigoth kings appointed their eldest sons to manage the kingdom's affairs, so that when the king died the eldest son was politically skilled enough to secure the throne.[26] In the 5th century, hereditary succession was increasingly stable until the Frankish invasions against the Visigoths led to a period of crisis in which the Visigoths reverted to elections. After the crisis was over in the 6th century, the family of Leovigild attempted to revive hereditary succession until Swintila was overthrown and the Fourth Council of Toledo formally declared elective succession as the principle of succession in 633.[27]

The Kingship of Aragon was initially elected by the "rich men" barons. Later this right was limited to the Cortes confirming the succession of the heir.[28]

Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

[edit]
Main article: Royal elections in Poland
The Republic at the Zenith of Its Power. Golden Liberty. The Royal Election of 1573, by Jan Matejko

The tradition of electing the country's ruler, which occurred when there was no clear heir to the throne, dates to the very beginning of Polish statehood. The election privilege, exercised during the gatherings known as wiec, was usually limited to the most powerful nobles (magnates) or officials, and was heavily influenced by local traditions and strength of the ruler.[29]

Although the elective principle was already established in Polish political culture in the late Middle Ages, the rules changed significantly in the 1570s, and the principles developed in that period lasted until the Partitions of Poland.[30] There have been thirteen royal elections in Poland–Lithuania from 1573 to 1764.[30] Roșu (2017) marked the 1575/1576 Polish–Lithuanian royal election as the most significant for several reasons. First, 'the citizens of the commonwealth were forced to de facto depose their first elected king – thus applying the right of disobedience they had inscribed in their public records only two years before.' Second, it resulted in two candidates being proclaimed the winner, and in subsequent events the nobility was able to confirm their majority choice for Stephen Báthory and have it recognised, while avoiding war with Maximilian II of Habsburg.[31]

Scandinavia

[edit]

Scandinavian kingship, according to the Germanic tradition, was elected upon the death of the previous king.[2] The selection was not always limited to the heirs of the previous king (e.g. in Sweden when the royal house was changing between the houses of Eric and Sverker between generations). Originally, kings were supposed to be elected from among the descendants of a previous king, which was connected to descent from gods. There could also be joint rule between multiple kings. Disputed succession was common because of a large number of sons sired by kings. However, when single rule appeared in the 9th century, civil wars grew in frequency throughout the region. Later, Christianisation led to the promulgation of primogeniture in Norway in 1163 and Denmark in 1170, but the elective idea still persisted in the requirement to be certified by a local assembly and subsequently the magnates would still elect the new king, albeit while the incumbent king was still alive. This demonstrated the enduring power of the nobles.[32]

Sovereign Military Order of Malta

[edit]

The Sovereign Military Order of Malta, formerly known as the Knights Hospitaller or the Knights of Malta, remains a sovereign subject of international law since it was exiled to Rome from Malta during the French occupation of Malta under the First French Republic.[33] The Order is ruled by the Prince and Grand Master, who is elected for life by the Council Complete of State. The Prince and Grand Master holds the rank of Prince, bestowed by the Holy Roman Emperor in 1607 and holds the precedence of a cardinal of the Church since 1630.[34][35] The Council that elects the prince includes members of the Sovereign Council and other high-ranking office-holders and representatives of the Order's worldwide entities. The Sovereign Council, including the Grand Commander, the Grand Chancellor, the Grand Hospitaller, and the Receiver of the Common Treasure, aid the prince in governing the order.[36]

Asia

[edit]

Afghanistan

[edit]
Further information: Loya Jirga

In Afghanistan, loya jirgas have been reportedly organized since at least the early 18th century when the Hotaki and Durrani dynasties rose to power.[37]

Persia/Iran

[edit]

The Parthian Empire (248 BC–224 AD), also known as the Arsacid Empire, is considered to be the oldest elective monarchy in Asia.[38]

Mongol Empire

[edit]

In the Mongol Empire, the Great Khan was chosen by the Kurultai. This was often convened in the capital. Other critical leadership positions were also assigned.[39]

Korea

[edit]

The ancient Korean kingdom of Silla elected its first king by a conference of tribal and village elders in 57 BC.[40] Unified Silla's kings were elected by the aristocracy whose powers were on par with the king.[41] In the kingdom of Goguryeo, the ruler was originally chosen from among the heads of the five tribes, most often the Sono tribe.[42]

Siam/Thailand

[edit]

There were several occasions that the Kingdom of Siam and Thailand turned to a semi-elective monarchy system to settle the succession of the crown among disputed heirs:

  • In 1824, Phutthaloetla Naphalai died suddenly without having named a successor to viceroy Maha Senanurak, who had died 16 July 1817. According to the traditions of royal succession, the viceroy or uparaja was heir presumptive. If there were none, then an ad hoc senabodi consisting of senior officials present at the death of a king, would elect a successor.[43] As a result of enormous support from senior and influential noble, Chetsadabodin was elected as the successor.
  • In 1867, as Mongkut had not designated who would succeed him, the choice fell to a council to decide. The council led by Prince Deves, Mongkut's eldest half-brother, then chose Chulalongkorn as Mongkut's successor. However, Chulalongkorn was only 15 and so the council choose Si Suriyawongse to become the regent until Chulalongkorn came of age.[44]
  • On 2 March 1935, Prince Ananda Mahidol was elected by the National Assembly and the Thai government to succeed his uncle, King Prajadhipok, as the eighth king of the Chakri dynasty, because Prajadhipok, the previous king, had not named an heir before his abdication.

Oceania

[edit]

Several Māori tribes of the central North Island of New Zealand elected Pōtatau Te Wherowhero as their monarch in 1858. The Māori King movement or Kiingitanga has continued to the present. The current Māori monarch (i.e. monarch of the Kiingitanga movement, not of all Māori) is Kuīni (Queen) Nga wai hono i te po. While in principle the position is not hereditary, in practice every Māori monarch thus far has been a child of the previous monarch.

The Hawaiian Kingdom could be considered a de facto example. From 1864 until the monarchy was overthrown in 1893, it was constitutionally a hereditary monarchy utilizing male-preference primogeniture. However, the Constitutions of 1864 and 1887, and the draft constitution of 1893, all provided that, in the event of the extinction of the royal line, the Legislature would elect a "native aliʻi" as the new monarch and stirps of a new dynasty. In practice, however, during the entire time from 1864 until the abolition of the monarchy, the throne was never passed from parent to child, as every Hawaiian monarch who reigned during that period died without leaving issue. Following the 1872 death of King Kamehameha V, a non-binding referendum was held, in which William Charles Lunalilo won; he was subsequently elected king by the legislature in 1873. King Kalākaua was elected by the legislature in 1874, after Lunalilo's death. However, when Kalākaua died in 1891, the crown demised to the collateral line of his sister, Queen Liliʻuokalani. Prior to 1864, the Hawaiian King-in-Council appointed the heir to the Hawaiian throne.[citation needed]

The Americas

[edit]

United States

[edit]

An attempt to create an elective monarchy in the United States failed. Alexander Hamilton argued in a long speech before the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that the President of the United States should be an elective monarch, ruling for "good behavior" (i.e., for life, unless impeached) and with extensive powers. Hamilton believed that elective monarchs had sufficient power domestically to resist foreign corruption, yet there was enough domestic control over their behavior to prevent tyranny at home.[45] His proposal was resoundingly voted down in favor of a four-year term with the possibility of reelection.

Haiti

[edit]

The crown of the Empire of Haiti, established in 1804, was also elective according to its 1805 constitution.[46]

Other elections

[edit]

In 1971 seven individual Emirates in the Arabian Peninsula united to form the United Arab Emirates and became a federation. Upon its formation, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi was elected as the head of the state and Ra'is (President) of the union by the ruling monarchs of the other six Emirates, while Zayed himself voted for Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum, then ruler of Dubai.[47][48] Gopala, the first emperor of the Pala Empire, was chosen by independent regional warchiefs in the 8th century. This arrangement was common in many contemporary tribal societies in the region.[49]

Invitation

[edit]

In the past; new polities or countries in internal turmoil sometimes selected and invited some person to become their monarch.For example, on 9 October 1918 the Parliament of newly independent Finland elected Prince Frederick Charles of Hesse, brother-in-law of the German Emperor Wilhelm II, as King of Finland – but soon afterwards, this move was foiled by the German defeat in WWI and the demise of Monarchy in Germany itself, and Finland opted to become a Republic instead.[50] In 862, according to tradition, various East Slavic and Finnic tribes invited Rurik, a Varangian chief, to re-establish order; he is considered to be the traditional founder of the Russian monarchy and his descendants ruled Russia until 1598.[51][52] In the Russian city-states of Pskov and Novgorod, various princes were invited to serve in their cities.[53][54][55]

Current elective monarchies

[edit]

Currently, the world's only true elective monarchies are:

Cambodia

[edit]

Article 13 of the Cambodian Constitution stipulates that the monarch is chosen for a life term by the 9-member Royal Council of the Throne, the composition of which includes the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Prime Minister, the two Patriarchs of the country’s two main Buddhist Sangha Nikayas, the 1st and 2nd Deputy Presidents of the Senate and the 1st and 2nd Deputy Speakers of the National Assembly. Article 14 of the Constitution further states that the royal candidate for the throne must be at least 30 years old and a descendant of the late King Ang Duong, King Norodom or King Sisowath.[56]

Holy See

[edit]

In the Holy See and the associated Vatican City State, the Pope is elected for life in a conclave by the College of Cardinals, generally from among their number.

Malaysia

[edit]
See also: Succession to the Malaysian thrones, Adat Perpatih, and Yamtuan Besar

The Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King) of Malaysia is elected to a five-year term. Nine hereditary rulers from the Malay States form a Conference of Rulers to determine the next king via secret ballot. The position has to date been de facto rotated amongst the state rulers, originally based on seniority. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall not be re-elected unless the rotation succession was complete.[57]

  • Additionally, the Malaysian state of Negeri Sembilan is itself an elective monarchy, where the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan is selected by a council of ruling chiefs. The ruling chiefs themselves are elected by the chieftain. Male candidates are determined based on matrilineal clan due to the influence of Minangkabau culture. The system was partially the basis for the federal monarchy.[58]
  • The Sultan of Perak is selected from amongst the most senior male princes descending from the 18th Sultan of Perak, Sultan Ahmadin. The Sultan, Raja Muda (Crown Prince), and Raja Di-Hilir (Deputy Crown Prince) are selected by the Dewan Negara of Perak. A son of the reigning Sultan cannot become Raja Muda if there is a more senior prince descended from the previous Sultan; this is possible should the senior prince relinquish his right to become Raja Muda.[59]

United Arab Emirates

[edit]

The president is elected by the Federal Supreme Council with a term of five years.[60] Since its formation, the position has been a de facto hereditary position to the Al Nahyan sheikhs of Abu Dhabi by consensus of the Federal Supreme Council. Likewise, the Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE is a position held by the Al Maktoum sheikhs of Dubai. Elections are held every 5 years. The position of the ruler of each emirate of the United Arab Emirates is determined by consensus of the respective ruling royal family of that emirate.[61][62]

Similar forms

[edit]
  • The cacique of the Ngöbe people of Costa Rica and Panama is appointed for life by a council of 13 elders. The latest election was in 2013 after the death of the previous cacique at around 100 years old.[63] The current cacique is Costa Rican-born Pedro Palacios, son of the previous cacique Pedro Bejarano.[64]
  • While Samoa has been a parliamentary republic since independence in 1962, it was commonly mistaken for an elective monarchy for most of its existence. The Constitution of Samoa provides that the Head of State is elected for a five-year term by the Fono, the Samoan parliament. Articles 18 and 45 of the Constitution provide, respectively, that any Member of Parliament may be elected head of state, and that any Samoan citizen may be elected to Parliament, although 47 out of the 49 seats in the Fono are reserved for matai, or chiefs (the other two are reserved for non-Samoans).[65] However, most of the confusion stemmed from a special clause which named Malietoa Tanumafili II and Tupua Tamasese Meaʻole, who were two of the four paramount chiefs (Tama-a-Aiga), as joint presidents for life, only reverting to the normal rule of electing the head of state for five years upon Malietoa's death in 2007. In addition, the Samoan head of state is referred to as "His Highness",[66] and an unwritten constitutional convention dictates that the President is elected from among the four paramount chiefs.[citation needed]
  • Saudi Arabia's throne, while hereditary, is not determined by a succession law but rather by consensus of the House of Saud as to who will be Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia; consensus may change depending on the Crown Prince's actions or influence, creating strong incentive for the Crown Prince to assert his power. Since 2007, the process of establishing the consensus of the House has been institutionalized in the form of the Allegiance Council, comprising the most powerful senior princes, which has the power to disapprove the King's nominee for Crown Prince and substitute its own by simple majority vote.[67]
  • The Kiingitanga movement in New Zealand chooses a Māori monarch, elected by the Tekau-mā-rua, who are generally chiefs of various New Zealand iwi (tribes). However, every Māori monarch to date has been succeeded by a child.[68] Notably, the current Māori monarch Nga wai hono i te po was chosen ahead of her 2 elder brothers, which was subject to some controversy in the Māori community.[69]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Andeweg, Rudy B.; Elgie, Robert; Helms, Ludger; Kaarbo, Juliet; Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand (30 July 2020). The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-253691-4.
  2. ^ a b Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2000). "The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession". Public Choice. 103 (1): 63–84. doi:10.1023/A:1005078532251. S2CID 154097838. Archived from the original on 2021-02-25. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
  3. ^ Kokkonen, Andrej; Møller, Jørgen; Sundell, Anders (8 July 2022). The Politics of Succession: Forging Stable Monarchies in Europe, AD 1000-1800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-265194-5.
  4. ^ Richard, Gabriel A. (2010). Philip II of Macedonia: Greater Than Alexander. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 45. ISBN 978-1597975193.
  5. ^ Allen M. Ward; Fritz M. Heichelheim; Cedric A. Yeo (2016). History of the Roman People. Taylor & Francis. p. 36. ISBN 9780205846795.
  6. ^ Adrastos Omissi (2018). Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire Civil War, Panegyric, and the Construction of Legitimacy. OUP Oxford. pp. 13–14. ISBN 9780192558268.
  7. ^ a b c Halden, Peter (2020). Family Power: Kinship, War and Political Orders in Eurasia, 500–2018. Cambridge University Press. pp. 66–67. ISBN 978-1108495929.
  8. ^ Figgis, John Neville (1914). The Divine Right of Kings. CUP Archive. pp. 79–80.
  9. ^ Christopher Edward Taucar (2014). The British System of Government and Its Historical Development. McGill-Queen's Press. pp. 275–276. ISBN 978-0773596566.
  10. ^ Bob Harris; Alan R. MacDonald (2007). Scotland: the making and unmaking of the nation, c. 1100-1707, Volume 2. Dundee University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-1845860288.
  11. ^ James Panton (2011). Historical Dictionary of the British Monarchy. Scarecrow Press. p. 471. ISBN 978-0810874978.
  12. ^ In Early Irish laws and institution (1934) Eoin MacNeill stated that, according to the annal evidence, tanistry originated only about a century after the Anglo-Norman invasion, p. 148.
  13. ^ Case of Tanistry (1608), Davis 28 180 E.R 516
  14. ^  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Tanistry". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 398.
  15. ^ Freeman, Philip (2006). The Philosopher and the Druids: A Journey Among the Ancient Celts. Simon and Schuster. p. 95. ISBN 0743289064.
  16. ^ Walker, Williston (1888). On the Increase of Royal Power in France Under Philip Augustus, 1179-1223. Gressner & Schramm. pp. 4–7.
  17. ^ John S.C. Abbott (2019). Louis Philippe. BoD – Books on Demand. pp. 151–152. ISBN 978-3734074752.
  18. ^ Gino Raymond (2008). Historical Dictionary of France (2, revised ed.). Scarecrow Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0810862562.
  19. ^ John Burley Waring (1874). The state, a sequel to the 'Universal Church'; together with a suppl. 'Record of thoughts', and some essays. p. 2.
  20. ^ "The Emperor: Qualifications". The Holy Roman Empire. Heraldica. Archived from the original on 2016-12-08. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
  21. ^ "The Avalon Project : The Golden Bull of the Emperor Charles IV 1356 A.D."
  22. ^ Mahoney, William (2011). The History of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 73–74. ISBN 978-0313363061.
  23. ^ Austria in 1848-49: being a history of the late political movements in Vienna, Milan, Venice, and Prague; with details of the campaigns of Lombardy and Novara; a full account of the Revolution in Hungary; and Historical sketches of the Austrian Government and the princes of the empire: 2. Low. 1852. p. 23.
  24. ^ Roșu, Felicia (2017). Elective Monarchy in Transylvania and Poland-Lithuania, 1569-1587. Oxford University Press. pp. 24–31. ISBN 978-0192506436.
  25. ^ Keefe, Eugene K. (1976). Area Handbook for Spain. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 16. ISBN 0160015677.
  26. ^ E. Olsen (2002). The Calabrian Charlatan, 1598–1603 Messianic Nationalism in Early Modern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 41. ISBN 9780230597143.
  27. ^ Joseph F. O'Callaghan (1983). A History of Medieval Spain. Cornell University Press. p. 58. ISBN 9780801492648.
  28. ^ Thomas Henry Dyer (1877). Modern Europe: From the Fall of Constantinople to the Establishment of the German Empire, A.D. 1453-1871 (2 ed.). Bell. p. 63.
  29. ^ Juliusz Bardach, Boguslaw Lesnodorski, and Michal Pietrzak, Historia panstwa i prawa polskiego (Warsaw: Paristwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1987), p.62-63
  30. ^ a b Roșu 2017, p. 10.
  31. ^ Roșu 2017, p. 12.
  32. ^ Phillip Pulsiano; Kirsten Wolf (2017). Routledge Revivals: Medieval Scandinavia (1993): An Encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 621. ISBN 978-1351665018.
  33. ^ Theutenberg, Bo J. [in Swedish] (2003). The Holy See, the Order of Malta and International Law (PDF). Johnny Hagberg and Skara stiftshistoriska sällskap. ISBN 91-974235-6-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-11-23.
  34. ^ Sire, H.J.A. (1994). The Knights of Malta. Yale University Press. p. 221. ISBN 0300068859. Archived from the original on 2022-05-15. Retrieved 2020-09-23.
  35. ^ Noonan Jr., James-Charles (1996). The Church Visible: The Ceremonial Life and Protocol of the Roman Catholic Church. Viking. p. 135. ISBN 0-670-86745-4.
  36. ^ "The Sovereign Council of the Order of Malta". Order of Malta. Archived from the original on 2018-10-20. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  37. ^ Jon Krakauer (September 11, 2009). "To Save Afghanistan, Look to Its Past". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2021-05-08. Retrieved 2014-10-29.
  38. ^ Rawlinson, George (4 March 2018). A Short History of Parthia. Perennial Press. ISBN 9781531263249. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
  39. ^ Tan, Koon San (15 August 2014). Dynastic China: An Elementary History. The Other Press. ISBN 978-9839541885. OCLC 898313910.
  40. ^ Sung Chul Yang (2019). The North And South Korean Political Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge. p. 82. ISBN 978-1000232127.
  41. ^ Hugh Dyson Walker (2012). East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse. pp. 204–205, 457. ISBN 978-1477265161.
  42. ^ James H. Grayson (2013). Korea - A Religious History. Routledge. p. 17. ISBN 978-1136869259.
  43. ^ "Rattanakosin Period (1782 -present)". Thailand Introduction. GlobalSecurity.org. August 18, 2013. Retrieved June 5, 2013. If there was no uparaja at the time of the king's death—and this was frequently the case—the choice of a new monarch drawn from the royal family was left to the Senabodi, the council of senior officials, princes, and Buddhist prelates that assembled at the death of a king. It was such a council that chose Nang Klao's successor.
  44. ^ Chakrabongse, Chula (1967). Lords of Life: A History of the Kings of Thailand. Internet Archive. London: Alvin Redman.
  45. ^ Hamilton, Alexander (1962). The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, Volume 9. New York: Columbia University Press.
  46. ^ "Haiti: 1805 Constitution". faculty.webster.edu. Archived from the original on 2015-09-15. Retrieved 2016-09-11.
  47. ^ "The UAE". Archived from the original on 2020-04-09. Retrieved 2019-12-13.
  48. ^ "Sheikh Mohammed recalls meeting which paved way for UAE". Archived from the original on 2022-05-15. Retrieved 2019-12-13.
  49. ^ Nitish K. Sengupta (1 January 2011). Land of Two Rivers: A History of Bengal from the Mahabharata to Mujib. Penguin Books India. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-14-341678-4. Archived from the original on 2 May 2016. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  50. ^ Krekola, Joni. "Kamppailu hallitusmuodosta 1918–1919 -tietopaketti, osa 1: Kuningas valitaan ylimääräisillä valtiopäivillä" [Struggle over the form of government, 1918–1919 – Information package, part 1: A king is chosen at the extraordinary parliament]. Parliament of Finland. Archived from the original on 2024-07-27. Retrieved 2025-09-27.
  51. ^ Middleton, John (1 June 2015). World Monarchies and Dynasties. Routledge. p. 805. ISBN 978-1-317-45158-7. One of the Rus princes—Rurik (r. ca. 862–879)—became ruler of Novgorod (r. ca. 862–879) and is considered the traditional founder of Russia. Rurik was the ancestor of the many family branches of the Riurikid dynasty, which ruled until 1598.
  52. ^ Borrero, Mauricio (2009). Russia: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present. Infobase Publishing. p. 254. ISBN 978-0-8160-7475-4.
  53. ^ Blockmans, Wim; Krom, Mikhail; Wubs-Mrozewicz, Justyna, eds. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Maritime Trade around Europe 1300–1600: Commercial Networks and Urban Autonomy. Routledge History Handbooks. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781315278551. Retrieved 2017-07-18. The Pskov men invited princes to Pskov whose professional armoured cavalry was very important for a city that had constant wars with the Livonian Order. [...] The princely power grew during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries while the prince himself usually was a protégé of the grand prince of Moscow. [...] However, the right that was especially valued by Pskov men was that to expel princes whom they disliked.
  54. ^ Parker, Geoffrey (2004). "8: Princes, Bishops and Republics: Cities and City-States in Russia". Sovereign City: The City-state Through History. Globalities Series. London: Reaktion Books. p. 124. ISBN 9781861892195. Retrieved 2017-07-18. From 1075 the people of Novgorod 'invited' the prince to take the throne and it is clear that the princes were now there only so long as they satisfied the Novgorodians and obeyed their laws.
  55. ^ Krom, Mikhail (2014). "The City of Pskov in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries: Communal Liberties and Fragmented Sovereignty". Russian History. 41 (4): 446. doi:10.1163/18763316-04104003. ISSN 0094-288X. JSTOR 24667180.
  56. ^ The Secretariat of the Constitution Council (July 2015). "Faolex Fao" (PDF). FAO. Retrieved August 3, 2023.
  57. ^ "Rules for royal succession - The Malaysian Bar". www.malaysianbar.org.my. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  58. ^ "Yang di–Pertuan Agong: Monarchy Within Democracy - The Malaysian Bar". www.malaysianbar.org.my. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  59. ^ "Rules for royal succession - The Malaysian Bar". www.malaysianbar.org.my. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  60. ^ "Khalifa bin Zayed re-elected President of UAE". 11 June 2019. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  61. ^ UAE: How to Invest, Start and Run Profitable Business in the UAE. Washington DC: International Business Publications. 29 April 2014. p. 41. ISBN 9781433084829. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
  62. ^ Countries and Territories of the World. p. 456. Archived from the original on 2022-05-15. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  63. ^ "Elección de un cacique en tiempos modernos". Diario Extra. Archived from the original on 2019-03-28. Retrieved 2019-03-28.
  64. ^ "Brus malis se viste de fiesta tras elección de nuevo líder indígena". Actualidad CR. Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2019-03-28.
  65. ^ Constitution of the Independent State of Samoa Archived July 8, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  66. ^ "Official website of the head of state of Samoa". Archived from the original on 2012-02-20. Retrieved 2012-02-19.
  67. ^ "The Allegiance Institution Law". Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Washington, DC. 20 October 2006. Archived from the original on 5 November 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2011.
  68. ^ Rātana, Liam (2024-09-03). "How will the next Māori monarch be chosen?". The Spinoff. Retrieved 2025-09-22.
  69. ^ "'New dawn' as Māori queen is crowned". The Week. 2024-09-09. Retrieved 2025-09-22.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elective_monarchy&oldid=1321107194"