Draft:Entropic Revenge
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by HitroMilanese (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? |
 | This article possibly contains original research. (July 2025) |
Entropic revenge is a philosophical concept that describes the tendency for entropy to cause the deterioration and erasure of opponents or adversaries over time, rendering direct acts of hostility or retribution unnecessary. According to this concept, the second law of thermodynamics serves as an ultimate arbiter of justice, as entropy itself brings about the eventual dissolution of all organized systems, including those that might be considered antagonistic.
Overview
[edit]The concept of entropic revenge draws from the fundamental principle that entropy in isolated systems tends to increase over time, leading to the gradual breakdown of order and structure.[1] Proponents of this idea argue that this natural tendency eliminates the need for active retaliation against opponents, as time and the inexorable march of entropy will eventually achieve what direct confrontation might seek to accomplish. The philosophical framework suggests that patience and temporal perspective can serve as alternatives to immediate reactive hostility, since entropy acts as a universal equalizer that affects all organized matter and energy systems without discrimination.[2]
Philosophical foundations
[edit]Thermodynamic metaphysics
[edit]Entropic revenge is grounded in the application of thermodynamics to metaphysics and ethics. The concept builds upon the work of thinkers who have explored the philosophical implications of entropy, including Henry Adams' application of thermodynamic principles to historical processes.[3] The idea extends the second law of thermodynamics—which states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases—into the realm of moral and social philosophy. Since the 19th century, a number the philosophers have drawn upon the concept of entropy to develop novel metaphysical and ethical systems.
Temporal justice
[edit]The concept implies a form of temporal justice where the passage of time serves as an impartial judge. Rather than seeking immediate retribution, entropic revenge suggests that the natural progression of entropy will ultimately resolve conflicts through the universal tendency toward disorder and decay. This perspective aligns with broader philosophical discussions about the relationship between time, causality, and moral outcomes, suggesting that natural processes can serve moral functions without conscious intervention.
Theoretical implications
[edit]Passivity as strategy
[edit]Entropic revenge proposes that strategic passivity can be more effective than active engagement in certain conflicts. By recognizing that entropy will eventually degrade all organized opposition, one can avoid the costs and risks associated with direct confrontation.
Universal applicability
[edit]The concept suggests a universal principle that applies regardless of the scale of conflict—from personal disputes to larger social and political antagonisms. The inexorable nature of entropy means that all organized systems, regardless of their current strength or influence, are subject to eventual decay.
Criticisms and limitations
[edit]Timeframe concerns
[edit]Critics argue that the timescales involved in entropic processes may be too long to be practically relevant for human conflicts and moral considerations. The heat death of the universe may be billions of years away, making entropic revenge impractical for immediate justice concerns.
Moral passivity
[edit]Some philosophers contend that relying on entropic revenge could lead to moral passivity and the abdication of responsibility for addressing immediate harms and injustices. This criticism suggests that waiting for entropy to resolve conflicts may allow unnecessary suffering to continue.
Selective application
[edit]The concept may be criticized for potentially selective application, where individuals might invoke entropic revenge only when it serves their interests while ignoring it when immediate action would be beneficial.
Related concepts
[edit]See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Schrödinger 1944, p. 73.
- ^ Adams 1910, p. 127.
- ^ Adams 1910.
Sources
[edit]- Adams, Henry (1910). A Letter to American Teachers of History. Washington, D.C.: Privately printed.
- Schrödinger, Erwin (1944). What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- "The Unbecoming of Being: Thermodynamics and The Metaphysics and Ethics of Entropic Decay". Technophany, A Journal for Philosophy and Technology. 2024.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Entropy at Wikimedia Commons