Draft:Aretecracy
| Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,962 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 9 November 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
| Submission declined on 4 November 2025 by Drmies (talk). Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability. Declined by Drmies 19 days ago. |
Comment: I'm sensing some possible LLM use here —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 10:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Hard to establish notability for a concept invented by a scholar when the only sourcing is from that scholar. Drmies (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Aretecracy (from ἀρετή aretḗ, “virtue/excellence”, and κράτος krátos, “rule/power”; Spanish: Aretecracia) is a democratic proposal by legal scholar Milton Arrieta-López in which standing for public office requires a prior civic–ethical qualification and candidates then compete in ordinary universal elections.[1] Proponents describe the design as a way to professionalize political candidacy and public service through standardized prequalification and explicit control mechanisms (procedural oversight and revocation) before the electoral stage. Administration may be centralized in a national civic-ethics authority or, under uniform national standards and external auditing, delegated to accredited non-partisan institutions (for example, universities selected via competitive procedures).[2][3]
Concept and origins
[edit]Arrieta-López outlined the idea across several works, including La Aretedemocracia o Virtudemocracia (2018), De la Democracia a la Aretecracia (2019), and a later English manuscript, Beyond Populism and Plutocracy: Aretecracy as a New Democratic Paradigm (2024).[4][2][3] He used variant labels such as Aretedemocracy/Virtuedemocracy (Spanish: Aretedemocracia/Virtudemocracia) and later Aretecracy/Aretecracia (also Aretocracy/Aretocracia). In the model, electoral competition takes place only after the civic–ethical prequalification stage.[2]
Scholarly reception and usage
[edit]Peer-reviewed discussion includes Iriarte-Angarita (2020), who analyses the proposal (as “aretecracia/virtuscracia”) within virtue-centred democratic theory and places it in contrast to technocracy and meritocratic approaches.[1] The term also appears in independent academic contexts that cite or discuss Arrieta-López in broader debates on democracy and citizenship (e.g., Moreno, Megías & Fernández del Río, 2023; De León Vertel, 2025).[5][6]
Applications and mentions
[edit]An NGO in consultative status (CLIPSAS) presented “Aretecracy” to the UN ECOSOC High-Level Segment in 2020 in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).[7] In 2021, the Constitution and Regulations Committee of the Congress of Peru cited the proposal while discussing bills to amend the Organic Law of the Executive regarding ethical and managerial requirements for ministers of state.[8]
Safeguards and control mechanisms
[edit]Design descriptions emphasize due-process guarantees for certifying and oversight bodies, public criteria and reasons in certification and revocation decisions, rights to appeal and judicial review, rotation and term-limits for oversight members, citizen audits, and provision for independent or international observation where appropriate.[2][3]
Criticism and debates
[edit]Commentary on prequalification models notes potential risks including political gatekeeping, partisan capture of certifying bodies and tensions between openness and screening. Advocates point to transparency, rotation, citizen audits and independent review as safeguards.[1]
Comparison with other governance models
[edit]| Model | Access to leadership | Electoral process | Common criticism (general) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal democracy | Open to all | Yes | Vulnerable to manipulation by money or demagogy |
| Technocracy | Experts only | No | Anti-democratic elitism |
| Meritocracy | Advancement by technical credentials | Varies | Overweights academic/technical metrics |
| Aretecracy | Open with civic–ethical qualification | Yes | Risk of institutional bias or gatekeeping |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c Iriarte-Angarita, Álvaro A. (2020). "La aretecracia/virtuscracia como objetivo teleológico de la sociedad civil del siglo XXI". Sostenibilidad, Tecnología y Humanismo (in Spanish). 11 (1): 94–106. doi:10.25213/2216-1872.40.
- ^ a b c d Arrieta-López, Milton (2019). "De la democracia a la aretecracia: origen, evolución y universalización". Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana (in Spanish). 24 (Extra 3): 115–132.
- ^ a b c Arrieta-López, Milton (2024). Beyond Populism and Plutocracy: Aretecracy as a New Democratic Paradigm (Manuscript).
- ^ Arrieta-López, Milton (2018). "La Aretedemocracia o Virtudemocracia: Un sistema de gobierno calificado contra las deformaciones de la democracia". Justicia (in Spanish). 23 (34): 539–554. doi:10.17081/just.23.34.3406.
- ^ Moreno, Cristina; Megías, Adrián; Fernández del Río, Alejandro (2023). "Retos para la democracia en el nuevo contexto de IA e IoT: Hacia una nueva ciudadanía". Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político (in Spanish) (18): 139–155. doi:10.46661/REVINTPENSAMPOLIT.8211 (inactive 11 November 2025).
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2025 (link) - ^ De León Vertel, Cecilia del Carmen (2025). "Representaciones sociales: de las prácticas democráticas y del saber elegir representantes escolares Montería Colombia". Punto Educativo (in Spanish): 702–714. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17438274.
- ^ Statements submitted by NGOs in consultative status (High-Level Segment), E/2020/NGO/1 (PDF) (Report). United Nations Economic and Social Council. 2020.
- ^ Dictamen recaído en los proyectos de ley 0048/2021-CR, 0051/2021-DP, 0055/2021-CR y 0184/2021-CR que modifica la Ley 29158 Ley Orgánica del Poder Ejecutivo para fortalecer las capacidades de gestión de los ministros de Estado (PDF) (Dictamen) (in Spanish). Congreso de la República del Perú, Comisión de Constitución y Reglamento. 2021.
{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Further reading
[edit]- Arrieta-López, M. (2018). “La Aretedemocracia o Virtudemocracia…”. Justicia, 23(34), 539–554. doi:10.17081/just.23.34.3406.
- Arrieta-López, M. (2019). “De la democracia a la aretecracia…”. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(Extra 3), 115–132.
- Arrieta-López, M. (2024). Beyond Populism and Plutocracy: Aretecracy as a New Democratic Paradigm. (manuscript).
- Draft articles on society
- Draft articles on philosophy and religion
- Draft articles on politics and government
- AfC submissions on history and social sciences
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/13 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/10 November 2025
- AfC submissions by date/05 November 2025
- AfC submissions by date/04 November 2025


- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.