Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.


    Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

    Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

    Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
    Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: WP:CT/SASG -- ECR violations. Jay8g [VTE] 07:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thank you for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 10:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Sugar Tax (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Move protected Extended-confirmed level. Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Sugar Tax (talk) 08:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thank you for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 10:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Considering the fact that Suharto, one of Indonesia most controversial leader, has just been nominated as a National Hero. It's best for the page to be under semi-protected to prevent vandalism and misinformation. SteamManx (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Please submit another request if the article is significantly affected by disruptive editing. — Newslinger talk 11:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of vandalism motivated by malicious means, removing notable accomplishments from the article, which are both verified by independent local and international media, the Miss World organization official channels, Miss World 2025 article, and social media. Samsaib (talk) 08:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Requesting extended protection or semi protection due high level of vandalism from sockpuppet accounts with only one edit and also IP vandalism Connorcp (talk) 10:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thank you for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 11:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent defamatory vandalism. Pr0m37h3u$ 10:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated disruptive edits and possible vandalism from accounts talk with apparent personal grudges. Aarong artisans' real life stories: [1] Ullan364 (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Disruptive, organised, fancruft - padding the article with mass copypastes from film articles Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 10:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Ongoing unsourced or poorly sourced edits. ~2025-32357-42 (talk) 11:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Several SPA and IP accounts keep removing citation templates without providing valid sources, and/or dump huge loads of irrelevant sources in badly formated refs. The article needs more watchers and possibly a temporary protection. --~2025-32357-42 (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

    Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

    To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

    DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

    • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
      • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
      • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
    • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
    • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
    • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

    You may request a protection reduction below if...

    • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
    • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
    • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
    • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

    If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
    Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here

    Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

    Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.


    Paul Bondeson not Pete Bondeson ~2025-32054-74 (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Question: Which page are you requesting to edit? 1962 Doral Open does not exist. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    1. ^ "Aarong artisans leading a women's revolution in Manikganj". Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved 10 November 2025.