User talk:Shangledonfangledon

November 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cabbage have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cabbage was changed by Shangledonfangledon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943912 on 2025-11-04T19:31:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:31, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerbal Space Program. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kerbal Space Program was changed by Shangledonfangledon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907193 on 2025-11-04T19:33:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:33, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Category:Edible plants, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Criticize (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Shangledonfangledon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Clearly [[WP:NOTHERE|not here to build an encyclopedia]]

Blocking administrator: Isabelle Belato (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline. You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was contributing to a neocaridina shrimp page and I was blocked, someone else on my account was making those vandalism esque edits Shangledonfangledon (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shangledonfangledon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

The admin that banned me stated that I was "not here for encyclopedia" but I infact was and I was banned for adding a statement that was lacking on a page

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would mainly correct grammatical errors and correct false statements

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

remove admin Isabell belatos permissions to block people

Shangledonfangledon (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

apealing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shangledonfangledon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was banned for "CLEARLY NOT HERE FOR ENCYCLOPEDIA" but I was adding an actual thing that proves that the moderator that banned me should be forbidden from making decisions Shangledonfangledon (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I looked at one of your edits at random and it was this. You clearly aren't trying to create an encyclopedia. PhilKnight (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.