User talk:Isabelle Belato

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be auto-archived by .

Your revert at Talk:Trans woman

Consider this idle curiosity, but were you able to puzzle out the IPs specific logic? I got their overall meaning well enough. to whit: "ThE eXpErTs ArE aLl BiAsEd!!!1!"

But the actual, logical path by which they were attempting to express that laughable nonsense eludes me. It seems to be "If all experts agree, the fact that people are 'assigned' a gender at birth proves that the experts are all biased." But that's so far below the level of stupidity I've come to expect from most of these sorts that I feel I must be mistaken. And I often debate trans issues on TikTok, thus my bar for the lower end of their stupidity is already below sea level. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:39, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am lucky to have a found a discord community that is made up of mostly queer people, so I usually don't have to have to debates over such topics, which are simply considered to be basic human rights. When it comes to Wikipedia, my experience is that these kinds of off-topic comments can be summed up as either "people are bending over to the trans agenda" or "this scientific field has been taken over by the crazy leftists". Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:32, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your block of ~2025-35261-51

Hi! I've adjusted the settings of your block of User:~2025-35261-51 (whose only edit was vandalizing my talk page), as talk page revocation isn't ideal for a no-warning block with no signs of talk page disruption. As I'm technically involved (even if I am weakening the block rather than strengthening it), I'm making sure that this was okay to do: feel free to revert my action if that shouldn't have been done. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By now the responsible has already moved on, so this is likely moot, but 9 times out of 10 they will see their talk page as an additional venue to attack people until a sysop comes along to yank the TPA. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 02:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:37, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

22:40, 20 November 2025 Isabelle Belato talk contribs deleted page User:Rmfrost2020

Please, re-instate my article, seen below,

(BLP violation removed) Rmfrost2020 (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a further request for a word limit extension.

See [1]. In the circumstances (accusations made against me specifically, concerning things that happened over a decade ago and which have otherwise been undiscussed there), I don't think it unreasonable to be offered the opportunity to respond. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy. I've replied to your question, but to clarify, I've granted the requested 200 words. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:33, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You know, Isabelle, you need to enforce an IP ban to keep Andy away from me, not give him more room to denigrate and make aspersions against me. You need to take control of this man who harassing a female editor on and off wiki, or I will turn this into Trust and Safety and make them aware of your negligence. What more does a female editor have to do to get protection on Wikipedia? I fear for my safety because of that man. You need to do something fast. This is not a joke. Keep him away from me. Atsme 💬 📧 16:49, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]