User talk:Enterprisey

• Enterprisey/heslgajf
• Enterprisey/sandbox
• Enterprisey/sandbox2
• Enterprisey/sandbox5
• Enterprisey/sandbox5/asdf
• Enterprisey/talk-sandbox
• Enterprisey/test1

More reply-link testing

1 Enterprisey (talk!) 19:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

• 2 Enterprisey (talk!) 19:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  re Enterprisey (talk!) 19:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  re Enterprisey (talk!) 18:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

• 3 Enterprisey (talk!) 19:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
  • 4 Enterprisey (talk!) 19:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

suggestion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1013:B010:413C:D9C5:E57:C3BF:A4CB (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 09:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 09:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 10:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

rereEnterprisey (talk!) 10:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

rerere Enterprisey (talk!) 10:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

unsigned reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 18:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

very long post very long post very long post very long post very long post very long post very long post Enterprisey (talk!) 11:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

A post with confusing markup: <br> or {{break}} Enterprisey (talk!) 23:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 08:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Another: a<br> b <br/> c
d
e Enterprisey (talk!) 07:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 08:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

X Enterprisey (talk!) 07:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 08:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

And another: a<br/ >b<br / >c Enterprisey (talk!) 07:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

GA ReviewEnterprisey

This review is transcluded from Talk:Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonkASDF (talk · contribs) 12:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

• One of my favourite games ever, will review soon. Some preliminary points below. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
• There is a good deal of duplinking, try this script to highlight them:[1]
• First sentence under Reception needs a citation.
• The synopsis section contains info that doesn't simply summarise the game. The following info needs citation: "The events of Warcraft III occur after a timeskip from Warcraft II. This period was originally intended to have been documented in Warcraft Adventures, but was cancelled mid-development. The story was recommissioned in novel form."
• It seems you might want to separate the references from the story footnotes, looks confusing now.
• The infobox image could need a proper fair use template.
• This article[2] is listed as a possible source on the talk page, so I wonder if it could be used, or if it should just be removed from the talk page (it's in some weird template).

@FunkMonkASDF: Thanks for taking the time to review this. I removed most duplinks and added the required cite (that's the problem with stuff cited at Wikidata). Those sentences in the synopsis section were a relict of the article before my rewrite, I removed them as they no longer make sense, those things are already in the development section with cites. As for the references, I had them in a notes section but another editor disagreed. If you have a suggestion how to put it better, I'm all ears (I won't mind removing those refs as well though). I added the standard template to the infobox image (it was uploaded in 2006, long before those templates existed). The link you mention is already used as ref #65; I'll remove the template from talk. Regards SoWhy 14:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, that editor doesn't seem to have given any reason, and notes sections are standard, so I think you can just put it back. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 18:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Let's try to ping the editor, though, and see if we can get an explanation: LeeEXAMPLE. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

My mistake. I wish I knew why I made that change, but I have no idea. I'm usually pretty for using notes like this, so I'd completely ignore me, and change it back. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:51, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I undid it. Regards SoWhy 09:11, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Cool, that settles it. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

FunkMonkASDF, Enterprisey (talk!) 07:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

FunkMonkASDF, Enterprisey (talk!) 07:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

FunkMonkASDF, Enterprisey (talk!) 07:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

egsrgb Enterprisey (talk!) 07:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

• "a slight angle that only be zoomed" Can? Y
• Link Starcraft at first occurrence outside the intro. Y
• "Several years before the events of the games" By this time in the article body, you haven't mentioned the Warcraft series, perhaps a good place to name and link it. Y
• "the surviving combatants were herded into internment camps" By who, and combatants from all factions? I don't remember this being explained in the game?  Source added
• "Arthas slays Mal'Ganis" Not presented until this point, so the reader doesn't know who it is.  Mentioned in the fifth sentence of the paragraph

Ah, missed that. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

• "The Prophet(Later revealed to be 'Medivh')" Space after parenthesis? Y
• "the Lich King ," Unnecessary space. Y
• "Meanwhile, the Warsong Clan" Not introduced, say they are orcish. Y
• "betrayer from Warcraft: Orcs & Humans" Link. Y
• "After the success of Warcraft II and Warcraft II: Beyond the Dark Portal" Could give dates for context. Y
• "press conference by Rob Pardo" Present. please elaborate

Present the person, what is his role? Like you present Mike O'Brien. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Ahh,  Done SoWhy 12:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

• "As a result of this design choices" Plural or singular here? Y
• You don't need to spell out full names of people after first mention (such as Rob Pardo). Y
• "the game didn't change" Contractions are discouraged. Y
• "music on a separate soundtrack" What is meant by soundtrack here? A disc? In that case, it is a misnomer. Y
• Anything on the voice acting? I remember it as a pretty notable part of the game experience. Will look for more sources...
  •  Could not find more online. Information possibly exists offline in old magazines but I can't find it (I used all resources I have access to through the Wikipedia Library as well). SoWhy 19:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
• Where was the orchestral music recorded, and by who? Will check...
  •  Not possible Best I can tell from the sources available online is [3]. Judging from the booklet scans found while searching the web, there is no information apart from "Blizzard" (see official entry, which I added). SoWhy 19:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
    • I have the manual, if you do not, which might have the answer to the who if not where (it should be the Jason Hayes group--the group imploded after doing the WoW classic soundtrack). --IznoASDF (talk) 21:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

That sounds good, maybe the manual is online somewhere? FunkMonkASDF (talk) 22:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

• It seems an oversight that there is little to no word on the visuals/design. There seems to be plenty of expansive sources available on this, and it is a very distinct feature of the game. Doing...
  • Added a short paragraph. Honestly, I'm at a loss what exactly to write here. If you think there should be more, can you provide some examples? SoWhy 19:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm thinking character and environments, they are very bright and slightly anime like, and you'd have to mention Samwise Didier somewhere. This article[4] deals with a bit, I'm sure there's more out there. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 22:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

• "In January 2003, Blizzard announced that the expansion pack will be titled" Why present tense? Makes it look like the game is still to be released... Y
• "available in four different box arts" Available with? It is hard to be in a box art? Y
• "these inspired the fruition of the multiplayer online battle arena genre" and " paved the way for the multiplayer online battle arena genre". Isn't it sufficient to mention this under legacy? Y
• "and that the variety of factions and the balance between those factions." Seems something is missing here. Y
• "After Warcraft II: Beyond the Dark Portal" Link. Y
• I wonder if anything could be said about the game's influence on later releases in the Warcraft franchise. The Frozen Throne article already contains mentions that those events directly tie into WoW. Is that enough?

  A brief mention here maybe? Maybe in the section on the expansion, just a short sentence? FunkMonkASDF (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

  Y

• "before they can corrupt the World Tree" Only mentioned in the intro, which should not have unique info. Y
• "reviewers praising the game's... voice acting" The article body only states one reviewer called the acting "mediocre"... Doing... Y

@FunkMonkASDF: First of all, thanks again for all those annotations. I took the liberty to mark them in your comment. All changes were made with this edit. I'll check the rest later as it requires more reference hunting. Regards SoWhy 07:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Looks good so far, added some replies above. FunkMonkASDF (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

I will work on it when I get home and ping you once I'm done Regards SoWhy 12:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

@FunkMonkASDF: Okay, I did what I felt able to do, see notes above. Regards SoWhy 19:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

SoWhyASDF, r Enterprisey (talk!) 06:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Enterprisey (talk!) 06:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

FunkMonkASDF, a Enterprisey (talk!) 07:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit Request made by Ankit18gupta (talk) 04:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Citation: Facebook
Section to Edit: a
Spot where to add the fact: d
Quote: facebook
Rephrased Quote: d

Testing reply-link

Post that Enterprisey (talk!) 04:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

already has Enterprisey (talk!) 04:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

two replies Enterprisey (talk!) 04:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

and will now have three! Enterprisey (talk!) 05:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

4 Enterprisey (talk!) 10:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 11:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

rr Enterprisey (talk!) 09:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Initial post! Enterprisey (talk!) 09:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC) ADVANCED POST

• WITH
• LISTS

WHOAA Enterprisey (talk!) 05:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 05:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

rere Enterprisey (talk!) 05:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

existing reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 05:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

TEST POLL!

• I support this Enterprisey (talk!) 08:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  intelligent reply Enterprisey (talk!) 08:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

• I would prefer not to Enterprisey (talk!) 08:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  (Replied using the new script.) Enterprisey (talk) 09:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  re Enterprisey (talk!) 10:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  a reply Enterprisey (talk!) 18:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  x Enterprisey (talk!) 18:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  y Enterprisey (talk!) 09:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  another reply Enterprisey (talk!) 10:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

  nice smiley Enterprisey (talk!) 07:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot to sign — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enterprisey (talk • contribs)

HERE

ARE

THREE LINES Enterprisey (talk!) 11:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 11:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

first "r" Enterprisey (talk!) 07:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 11:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Testing notification system

Hi! APerson-test (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

re Enterprisey (talk!) 06:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

f Enterprisey (talk!) 05:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Xr Enterprisey (talk!) 05:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

X Enterprisey (talk!) 05:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

re2 Enterprisey (talk!) 05:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

x Enterprisey (talk!) 05:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

test Enterprisey (talk!) 09:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

q Enterprisey (talk!) 05:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

f Enterprisey (talk!) 06:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

g Enterprisey (talk!) 09:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

i Enterprisey (talk!) 05:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

l Enterprisey (talk!) 05:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

m Enterprisey (talk!) 10:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

o Enterprisey (talk!) 08:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

p Enterprisey (talk!) 08:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

q Enterprisey (talk!) 09:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

re!!! Enterprisey (talk!) 09:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Use as a web host

What should be done with the following page, User talk: Kurnia solution? Thanks, --Rubbish computer (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 09:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 04:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 09:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 09:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

re! Enterprisey (talk!) 09:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Testing notification system (again)

Hi! APerson-test (talk) 01:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC) t Enterprisey (talk!) 05:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

sup Enterprisey (talk!) 07:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

hey Enterprisey (talk!) 22:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

hey Enterprisey (talk!) 06:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

hey Enterprisey (talk!) 09:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

hey Enterprisey (talk!) 09:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

heyy Enterprisey (talk!) 09:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

heyyy Enterprisey (talk!) 09:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

r Enterprisey (talk!) 09:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH 2 (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Enterprisey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Testing notification gadget

foo Enterprisey (talk!) 08:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

bar Enterprisey (talk!) 08:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

t Enterprisey (talk!) 07:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

s Enterprisey (talk!) 08:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

t Enterprisey (talk!) 09:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

tt Enterprisey (talk!) 07:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

ttt Enterprisey (talk!) 18:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, end user

This message was posted using the OAuth Hello World end-user application, and should be seen as coming from yourself. To revoke this application's access to your account, visit meta:Special:OAuthManageMyGrants. Enterprisey (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

reply Enterprisey (talk!) 05:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

even MORE indented reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

highly indented reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 08:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

even more indented reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 09:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

e Enterprisey (talk!) 09:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

ee Enterprisey (talk!) 07:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

unindented Enterprisey (talk!) 06:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

less... indented Enterprisey (talk!) 18:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Testing MoveToDraft moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Testing MoveToDraft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Testing MoveToDraft moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Testing MoveToDraft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Testing MoveToDraft moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Testing MoveToDraft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Testing MoveToDraft moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Testing MoveToDraft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

I am reverting vandalism (look in my edits) but the LTA made a lot of edits and I can't revert them all... Do you have mass rollback? Thegooduser (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Good to know, thanks for reporting! I would say it's probably not the highest priority to have all of these edits reverted, since it's a test wiki after all. I don't have mass rollback, but have granted you rollback so you can undo the edits faster. Let me know if you have any other questions. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Cool thanks! User Scripts work here like on Wikipedia right? Also the lta had added the word "test" to every page they vandalise, I am reverting it by rollback, because it is a bad faith edit and an edit by an lta--Thegooduser (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Thegooduser - Yes, user scripts work here just like they would work on the production version of the project (en-wiki). The difference is that you'll want to change any hard-coded URLs to point to test.wikipedia.org instead of en.wikipedia.org so that they'll work on this project instead. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Oshwah, I meant, could I use rollback to revert the word 'test' added by lta? --Thegooduser (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Thegooduser - Assuming that the script was designed this way and is encoded to work on test-wiki properly, then sure. I don't have enough information to know this for certain though, for obvious reasons... ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Test-2020-09-21 has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Test-2020-09-21|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 06:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 08:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 09:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 09:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 09:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

sub

sub

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 10:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Testing AFCH|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 22:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enterprisey has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Enterprisey|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 09:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft has been accepted

{{subst:Afc talk|Draft|class=|sig=Enterprisey (talk!) 20:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)}}

Welcome to The Userscript Tour!

Hi mate! We're so delighted you wanted to play, to unveil the realm of userscripts. Trust us, you are sure to appreciate the power and flexibility of userscripts in no time! The Tour is divided into four missions, each with its own goals to help you implement userscripts with fundamental constructs incrementally.

Together these recipes of development aid you build cool JavaScript programs to change the very appearance and behaviour of your user account :)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4
Let's begin the journey	Developing with ResourceLoader	Strengths of the Action API	Novelty of OOUI

Welcome to The Userscript Tour!

Hi mate! We're so delighted you wanted to play, to unveil the realm of userscripts. Trust us, you are sure to appreciate the power and flexibility of userscripts in no time! The Tour is divided into four missions, each with its own goals to help you implement userscripts with fundamental constructs incrementally.

Together these recipes of development aid you build cool JavaScript programs to change the very appearance and behaviour of your user account :)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4
Let's begin the journey	Developing with ResourceLoader	Strengths of the Action API	Novelty of OOUI

Welcome to The Userscript Tour!

Hi mate! We're so delighted you wanted to play, to unveil the realm of userscripts. Trust us, you are sure to appreciate the power and flexibility of userscripts in no time! The Tour is divided into four missions, each with its own goals to help you implement userscripts with fundamental constructs incrementally.

Together these recipes of development aid you build cool JavaScript programs to change the very appearance and behaviour of your user account :)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4
Let's begin the journey	Developing with ResourceLoader	Strengths of the Action API	Novelty of OOUI

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The Userscript Tour

Welcome to The Userscript Tour!

Hi mate! We're so delighted you wanted to play, to unveil the realm of userscripts. Trust us, you are sure to appreciate the power and flexibility of userscripts in no time! The Tour is divided into four missions, each with its own goals to help you implement userscripts with fundamental constructs incrementally.

Together these recipes of development aid you build cool JavaScript programs to change the very appearance and behaviour of your user account :)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4
Let's begin the journey	Developing with ResourceLoader	Strengths of the Action API	Novelty of OOUI

The Userscript Tour

Welcome to The Userscript Tour!

Hi mate! We're so delighted you wanted to play, to unveil the realm of userscripts. Trust us, you are sure to appreciate the power and flexibility of userscripts in no time! The Tour is divided into four missions, each with its own goals to help you implement userscripts with fundamental constructs incrementally.

Together these recipes of development aid you build cool JavaScript programs to change the very appearance and behaviour of your user account :)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4
Let's begin the journey	Developing with ResourceLoader	Strengths of the Action API	Novelty of OOUI

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testing AFCH nkb (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JoBoGamer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Testing AFCH nkb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JoBoGamer (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Enterprisey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JoBoGamer (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)