User talk:CG7000

Welcome!

Hello, CG7000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Eastern Europe did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Austronesier (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Utopia (Travis Scott album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to revert all my edits in the article just because I removed the unsourced genres from the infobox. Genres need to be supported by sources, not by an opinion (see WP:NPOV). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023: Please do not revert edits without an explanation

Please do not perform unexplained reverts of constructive edits, as you did here. There is no excuse for reverting non-vandalism edits without a reason. I removed those genres because the prose explicitly refers to them as "elements", not as full genres, therefore they should not be in the infobox per WP:EXPLICITGENRE. Thank you. Ss112 23:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Keir Starmer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Filthy Frank Show (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IAmChaos was:

Articles may be speedily deleted from Wikipedia (i.e. without discussion), if they do not indicate why the subject is important. For more info, see WP:A7. If you think this topic is notable, please indicate why, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Filthy Frank Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Editing -- IAm Chaos 04:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CG7000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Happy Editing -- IAm Chaos 04:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Filthy Frank Show (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Niafied was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Filthy Frank Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Niafied (talk) 02:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]