User talk:Algirr

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 4.

Some advice about a possible unblock

I restored your talk page access because both I and other administrators thought that your latest UTRS appeal was much better than things you have previously said, both here and at UTRS, and we are prepared to give you a chance to show that you are willing to change. However, that absolutely does not mean that we are certain that you will do so. I wouldn't like to try to estimate how many times over the years I have seen blocked editors post unblock requests full of the kind of promises that they think will get them unblocked, only to return to the same behaviour that got them blocked in the first place. And do you know what happens then? They get blocked again pretty damned soon, with far less likelihood of ever bring unblocked again. Obviously I hope that you will change your approach (otherwise I wouldn't have restored your talk page access). However, if you are unblocked and return to your old ways don't expect yet another chance, on top of all the chances you've already been given: this is likely to be the last one. JBW (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Algirr (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(you should create an unblock request here) 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:46, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i know, thanks. Algirr (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Algirr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. The ability to edit my talk page was returned to me by the user "JBW" after the request for unblocking (UTRS appeal #105390), which he called "much better than things you (user Algirr) have previously said". I promise that I will try to do everything so that these incidents of rudeness do not happen again, and for example I will contact other users less to avoid this as much as possible (but enough to maintain the ability to resolve conflicts of edits and additions), focusing instead on adding new content and mostly creating more articles in Wikipedia.Algirr (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per below. This is your final chance. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:18, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Algirr (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Abecedare: thoughts on a final chance? voorts (talk/contributions) 21:36, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: I am okay with an unblock with an unblock (see longer comment here).

@Algirr: As I have said earlier, I believe you have something useful to contribute to wikipedia, which unfortunately has been stymied by assumption of bad faith and consequent battleground conduct. I hope you will take this opportunity to edit more collaboratively and use the resources and processes that wikipedia offers to settle any disputes that may arise in the future. If you have any questions about these processes feel free to ask at WP:TEAHOUSE, my talkpage, or approach any experienced editor you trust to get a sanity check. All the best. Abecedare (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Algirr (talk) 01:38, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Back! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 06:51, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Algirr (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assadization has been accepted

Assadization, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 18:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope you will find time to check other articles. One of them is about the Tadmor prison massacre, but if you look at it, please make your decision thoughtfully - I know that there was an article like this before and it was removed for being useless and having bad sources. But my article is much larger in size, it has more sources and information that is not listed anywhere else on the English Wikipedia Algirr (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen just in case, pending articles are on my user page Algirr (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the massacre article, and it was a really interesting read. I did find some of the language used in that draft a bit un-encyclopedic (e.g. the government carried out its cruel revenge), but that's an easy fix 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 18:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, i got you Algirr (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think i deleted all what i need to delete. I didn't found a lot of un-encyclopedic speeches, so i think i am done. Some emotional words just describing brutality of massacre Algirr (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen hello so what about my two articles on my user page? Algirr (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

will take a look at them later. I'll be going outside in a bit 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 15:58, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Algirr (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1980 Tadmor prison massacre has been accepted

1980 Tadmor prison massacre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:25, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks) Algirr (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Law No. 49 has been accepted

Law No. 49, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was surprised that this is B-class)) Algirr (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: De-Assadization (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:De-Assadization and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 04:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Algirr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 04:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Militarization of the education in Ba'athist Syria has been accepted

Militarization of the education in Ba'athist Syria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks))) Algirr (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iraq's arms industry under Saddam Hussein

Hello, Algirr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iraq's arms industry under Saddam Hussein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:38, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corrective Movement program (Syria) has been accepted

Corrective Movement program (Syria), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 13:23, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks) Algirr (talk) 21:44, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fourth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria (1976-1980) has been accepted

Fourth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria (1976-1980), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 04:24, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: July 1963 Syrian coup attempt has been accepted

July 1963 Syrian coup attempt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 04:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen thanks for checking both of them, can you please also check last one (Draft:Revolution Protection Law)? Thanks in advance, I hope its okay for you Algirr (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few WP:REFSPAM issues in there, I'll review it when it's fixed

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 15:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think I fixed it, I deleted some citations and links that repeated Algirr (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen just let me know if something is still not ok Algirr (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolution Protection Law has been accepted

Revolution Protection Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:06, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks) Algirr (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Fourth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria (1976–1980). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to request that you archive your user talk page. While it may not be bothersome to you, many editors have slow connections, and having a very large talk page can hamper communication. If you need help, just check out the guide over at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thanks! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen Do you know if South Yemen had five-year plans, like the Soviet Union did? I'm currently writing an article about five-year plans in Ba'athist Syria. Algirr (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Algirr They've had two AFAIK. To "implement the five-year plan" was a part of South Yemen's motto :). It would be nice of you to write something about south yemen's five year plans 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 03:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I forgot about the motto. Did they only have two plans? I think if they had one, they had many others, since it's pretty standard for communist regimes to always use five-year plans.

I think I'll get around to writing that article later, of course (and IF I have enough sources on the South Yemeni plans), since I'm also interested in that topic (though I'm nowhere near as knowledgeable about it as you are). However, for now, I want to focus as much as possible on Ba'athist Syria—I already have a lot of new articles planned on it. Algirr (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen, btw, I now have 3 articles waiting for approval, do you have ability to check them please?

Draft:Fifth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria (1981-1985)

Draft:Sixth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria (1986-1990)

Draft:Nezar al-Hindawi Algirr (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Algirr I'll review them later. Btw, you're experienced enough to publish your drafts to mainspace without going through WP:AFC 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I didn't understand even how to do it here. Algirr (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how many articles you have created but if you have created more than 25 articles then you can apply for WP:Autopatrolled. It doesn't do much but say that you are trusted with article creation, Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is little bit less than 25 Algirr (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I can't move pages to the articles if they already submitted for review by somebody Algirr (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:De-Assadization has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:De-Assadization. Thanks! Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks, I will do it later Algirr (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara I done it. Do you delete the article about de-assadization itself? Algirr (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can keep for now in case new information appears because assad only fell a couple of months ago Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 18:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Algirr (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nezar al-Hindawi has been accepted

Nezar al-Hindawi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sixth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria has been accepted

Sixth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria has been accepted

Fifth Five-Year Plan of Ba'athist Syria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your work quite deeply and it is rather good. There are some mistakes in the writing, but content creation is much more important that making sure every single thing is grammatical and what not. Other people can help you with that. However, I do think you should look at MOS:CITE since only the article creator knows about the citations in the article so it is important that they are complete and descriptive. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also from now, I would say you have made enough articles where you don't need to use AfC because the reviewers do not have comments. Just put them in your sandbox User:Algirr/Sandbox and export them, by moving or by copy pasting, to where you want it to go after. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for reviewing my articles) Algirr (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara, I moved a few new articles recently Algirr (talk) 03:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"1969 Syrian incident" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1969 Syrian incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § 1969 Syrian incident until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay if this redirect is removed, as it's the remnants of a deleted separate article that need to be easily finished off. Algirr (talk) 03:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on Syria!

You are doing great work on Syrian Ba'ath related articles! :) Ba'athist Syria article is beginning to get great coverage. I have only one comment really. You moved the page Corrective Movement (Syria) to Corrective Revolution (Syria), and then created the article Corrective Movement program (Syria). Ideally, this should be one article.

The Corrective Movement encompassed the seizure of power and the policies produced by it. Or at the very least, you need to connect those two articles better together.

Those are my words of wisdom, good luck! :) + since you are Russian, if you ever want to work on a Soviet-related article please inform me. I am planning to fix the article on the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union and the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union in line with my previous articles on unified power, supreme state organ of power and the permanent organ of the supreme state organ of power. TheUzbek (talk) 10:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheUzbek Thank you for the kind words) I believe these two articles should be kept separate, since one talks about the seizure of power itself (and very briefly about Assad's subsequent actions, simply because the article I wrote didn't exist at the time), while the other talks about specific actions over the next 30 years aimed at reform. In my opinion, my article contains enough information to warrant a separate article. Well, and also, in my humble opinion, this division into articles generates more interest in the topic than if they were merged into one article.

I'd be happy to say something about the USSR, and I'll likely do so in the future, but for now I want to focus entirely on Baathist Syria—I have a whole series of articles about it that I plan to write. Besides, the USSR is certainly covered MUCH better on Wikipedia than Baathist Syria, so it needs less revision. Algirr (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I also want to start by completely using up the huge number of sources about Syria that I have accumulated, so that I can forget about it with a clear conscience. Algirr (talk) 19:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for Ba'athist Syria

An article that been involved with (Ba'athist Syria) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Assad regimeAssad regime). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 01:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am, thanks for inviting Algirr (talk) 01:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Ahmed al-Sharaa § Infobox image

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Ahmed al-Sharaa § Infobox image. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 07:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]