Jump to content

Interest rate swap

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Interest rate swaps)

An interest rate swap is a derivative contract in which two parties exchange streams of interest payments on a notional principal for a set period. The most common form exchanges a fixed rate for a floating rate in the same currency. Variants include basis swaps, overnight index swaps (OIS), forward-start swaps and swaps with changing notionals. Since the late 2000s, collateralised swaps are typically priced and risk-managed using OIS discounting, and following the end of LIBOR new trades reference overnight risk-free rates such as the SOFR, the SONIA and the €STR. As at end-June 2024, interest rate derivatives were the largest segment of the global over-the-counter derivatives market by notional outstanding.[1][2][3]

History

[edit]

Arrangements resembling swaps emerged from back-to-back or parallel loans used in the 1970s to navigate exchange controls. A widely cited early landmark was a 1981 currency swap between IBM and the World Bank arranged by Salomon Brothers, which helped popularise the technique.[4][5] The first interest rate swap is commonly dated to 1982.[6]

Standard documentation and definitions from the ISDA in the 1990s and 2000s supported market growth and common terminology.[7] After the 2007–2008 financial crisis, pricing for collateralised swaps shifted to OIS discounting and multi-curve approaches, reflecting the role of collateral and funding costs.[8]

From 2021 to 2024, regulators completed the transition from LIBOR to overnight risk-free rates. Remaining synthetic sterling and United States dollar LIBOR settings ceased in 2024, which marked the end of LIBOR in mainstream use.[9][10]

Mechanics

[edit]

A standard interest rate swap has two legs linked to the same notional amount. The fixed leg pays a fixed rate on scheduled accrual periods. The floating leg pays a rate set at each reset date by a reference index such as the SOFR, the SONIA or the €STR, with payments exchanged on the corresponding payment dates. Day-count and business-day conventions follow market standards defined in documentation such as the ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions and, for on-venue trading, the relevant rulebooks.[11][12]

Variants include forward-start swaps, amortising or accreting notionals, zero-coupon swaps, basis swaps in which both legs float, and overnight index swaps that reference a compounded overnight rate.

Types

[edit]

Common structures include the following.[13][14]

  • Fixed-for-floating swaps exchange a fixed rate for a floating index in the same currency.
  • Basis swaps exchange a floating rate for a floating rate of a different tenor of the same index.
  • Overnight index swaps pay a fixed rate versus a compounded overnight risk-free rate such as SOFR, SONIA or €STR.
  • Forward-start and deferred-start swaps begin on a future date.
  • Amortising and accreting swaps use notionals that change over time.
  • Constant-maturity swaps link one leg to a constant-maturity swap rate.

Uses

[edit]

Common uses include hedging interest rate exposure, adjusting asset and liability duration, and expressing views on the level or shape of the yield curve. In United States markets, the futures and swaps ecosystem now links SOFR futures and SOFR-linked swaps after the conversion of Eurodollar futures and USD LIBOR swaps in 2023.[15]

Valuation and pricing

[edit]

A vanilla fixed-for-floating swap has a value equal to the difference between the present value of the fixed leg and the present value of the floating leg, discounted on the appropriate curve.

The present value of the fixed leg is

where is notional, is the fixed rate, are accrual fractions, are payment dates and are discount factors.

Under a standard par-swap set-up, the floating leg can be written using forward rates and discount factors:

The par swap rate that sets the swap’s value to zero is

For a quoted swap with fixed rate , the mark-to-market is often written

with .

Following the 2008 financial crisis, collateralised swaps are commonly discounted using the overnight index swap curve that matches the collateral rate specified under the credit support annex. This leads to multi-curve frameworks that separate discounting from forward-rate projection.[16][17] See next section

Multi-curve framework

[edit]

Historically IRSs were valued using discount factors derived from the same curve used to forecast the -IBOR rates (i.e. the erstwhile reference rates; see below re MRRs). This has been called "self-discounted". As above, it became more apparent following the 2008 financial crisis that the approach was not appropriate, and alignment towards discount factors associated with physical collateral of the IRSs was needed. See Financial economics § Derivative pricing for further context.

Thus, the now-standard pricing approach is the multi-curve framework. Note that the economic pricing principle is unchanged: leg values are still identical at initiation. Here, overnight index swap (OIS) rates are typically used to derive discount factors, since that index is the standard inclusion on Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) to determine the rate of interest payable on collateral for IRS contracts. As regards the rates forecast, since the basis spread between LIBOR rates of different maturities widened during the crisis, forecast curves are generally constructed for each LIBOR tenor used in floating rate derivative legs.[18]

Regarding the curve build, see: [19] [20] [21] Under the old framework a single self-discounted curve was "bootstrapped" for each tenor; i.e.: solved such that it exactly returned the observed prices of selected instruments—IRSs, with FRAs in the short end—with the build proceeding sequentially, date-wise, through these instruments. Under the new framework, the various curves are best fitted to observed market prices as a "curve set": one curve for discounting, and one for each IBOR-tenor "forecast curve"; the build is then based on quotes for IRSs and OISs, with FRAs included as before. Here, since the observed average overnight rate plus a spread is swapped for[22] the -IBOR rate over the same period (the most liquid tenor in that market), and the -IBOR IRSs are in turn discounted on the OIS curve, the problem entails a nonlinear system, where all curve points are solved at once, and specialized iterative methods are usually employed (see further following). The forecast-curves for other tenors can be solved in a "second stage", bootstrap-style, with discounting on the now-solved OIS curve.

A CSA could allow for collateral, and hence interest payments on that collateral, in any currency.[23] To accommodate this, banks include in their curve-set a USD discount-curve to be used for discounting local-IBOR trades which have USD collateral; this curve is sometimes called the (Dollar) "basis-curve". It is built by solving for observed (mark-to-market) cross-currency swap rates, where the local -IBOR is swapped for USD LIBOR with USD collateral as underpin. The latest, pre-solved USD-LIBOR-curve is therefore an (external) element of the curve-set, and the basis-curve is then solved in the "third stage". Each currency's curve-set will thus include a local-currency discount-curve and its USD discounting basis-curve. As required, a third-currency discount curve — i.e. for local trades collateralized in a currency other than local or USD (or any other combination) — can then be constructed from the local-currency basis-curve and third-currency basis-curve, combined via an arbitrage relationship known here as "FX Forward Invariance".[24]

Various approaches to solving curves are possible. Modern methods [25] [26] [27] tend to employ global optimizers with complete flexibility in the parameters that are solved relative to the calibrating instruments used to tune them. These optimizers will seek to minimize some objective function - here matching the observed instrument values - and this assumes that some interpolation mode has been configured for the curves; the approach ultimately employed may be a modification of Newton's method. Maturities corresponding to input instruments are referred to as "pillar points"; often, these are solved directly, while other spot rates are interpolated. (Then, once solved, all that need be stored are the pillar point rates and the interpolation rule.)

Starting in 2021, LIBOR is being phased out, with replacements including other "market reference rates" (MRRs) such as SOFR and TONAR. (These MRRs are based on secured overnight funding transactions). With the coexistence of "old" and "new" rates in the market, multi-curve and OIS curve "management" is necessary, with changes required to incorporate new discounting and compounding conventions, while the underlying logic is unaffected; see.[28][29][30]

Market structure and regulation

[edit]

A large share of plain-vanilla swaps is centrally cleared, with clearing mandates and reporting rules in major jurisdictions. In the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission updated the clearing requirement in 2022 to reflect the transition to risk-free rates and added SOFR overnight index swaps across standard maturities.[31] In the European Union, reforms under the EMIR 3.0 framework introduce an active account requirement intended to ensure EU market participants maintain and use accounts at EU central counterparties for specified interest rate derivatives.[32]

Market convention summaries for on-venue trading are published by swap execution facilities and multilateral trading facilities.[33]

Conventions by currency

[edit]

Typical fixed-leg conventions for vanilla swaps vary by currency. Actual terms depend on documentation and venue rules.[34][35]

Currency Typical fixed-leg frequency Typical fixed-leg day count Common floating index
USD Semi-annual 30/360 SOFR (compounded)
EUR Annual 30/360 €STR (compounded) or Euribor (legacy)
GBP Semi-annual ACT/365F SONIA (compounded)
JPY Annual ACT/365F TONA (compounded)

Risks

[edit]

Interest rate swaps expose users to several categories of financial risk. The main market risk is interest rate risk, since changes in discount factors and forward rates alter present value and can turn a position from an asset into a liability. Basis risk can arise when cash flows reference different floating rates or tenors, including in the post-LIBOR environment where differences between risk-free rates can be material.[36][37]

Swaps also create counterparty credit risk. Banks measure and manage the possibility that a counterparty may default, as well as changes in the value of expected exposures. Under the Basel framework, a credit valuation adjustment capital charge applies to capture the risk of CVA changing with credit spreads.[38][39]

Collateral and margining mitigate bilateral credit exposure but introduce funding and liquidity risks. Requirements at central counterparties and in bilateral agreements can amplify margin calls during stress. Central clearing reduces bilateral counterparty and liquidity risk through multilateral netting, but concentrates exposures between clearing members and the CCP.[40][41][42]

Financial reporting for swaps reflects these risks. Under IFRS 9, hedge accounting requirements replaced IAS 39 and align reporting more closely with risk management. Under US GAAP, ASC 815 governs derivatives and hedging, including targeted improvements issued since 2017.[43][44][45]

Benchmarks and market data

[edit]

ICE Swap Rate, formerly ISDAFIX, is a benchmark for swap rates in major currencies and is used in the valuation of some interest rate swaps and swaptions and for certain close-out calculations.[46]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2024". Bank for International Settlements. 21 November 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  2. ^ "The end of LIBOR". Financial Conduct Authority. 1 October 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  3. ^ "2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions". International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 4 October 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  4. ^ "Recent developments in the swap market" (PDF). Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin. 1987. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  5. ^ "Currency swaps" (PDF). World Bank Staff Working Papers No. 640. 1984. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  6. ^ "Instruments of the Money Market – Chapter 16 Swaps" (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. 2007. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  7. ^ "2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions". International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 4 October 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  8. ^ Piterbarg, Vladimir (February 2010). "Funding beyond discounting: collateral agreements and derivatives pricing". Risk. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  9. ^ "About LIBOR transition". Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  10. ^ "The end of LIBOR". Financial Conduct Authority. 1 October 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  11. ^ "2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions". International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 4 October 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  12. ^ "Swaps Made Available To Trade (MAT) – summary". Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 7 July 2023. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  13. ^ "Interest Rate Swaps: Cleared and Customized" (PDF). International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 1 July 2020. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  14. ^ "2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions". International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 4 October 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  15. ^ "Eurodollar Fallbacks Implementation Plan" (PDF). CME Group. 14 April 2023. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  16. ^ Piterbarg, Vladimir (February 2010). "Funding beyond discounting: collateral agreements and derivatives pricing". Risk. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  17. ^ Smith, Donald J. (2012). "Valuing Interest Rate Swaps Using OIS Discounting" (PDF). Boston University. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  18. ^ Multi-Curve Valuation Approaches and their Application to Hedge Accounting according to IAS 39, Dr. Dirk Schubert, KPMG
  19. ^ M. Henrard (2014). Interest Rate Modelling in the Multi-Curve Framework: Foundations, Evolution and Implementation. Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 978-1137374653
  20. ^ See section 3 of Marco Bianchetti and Mattia Carlicchi (2012). Interest Rates after The Credit Crunch: Multiple-Curve Vanilla Derivatives and SABR
  21. ^ Pricing and Trading Interest Rate Derivatives: A Practical Guide to Swaps, J H M Darbyshire, 2017, ISBN 978-0995455528
  22. ^ CQF Institute. "Multi-curve and collateral framework"
  23. ^ Fujii, Masaaki Fujii; Yasufumi Shimada; Akihiko Takahashi (26 January 2010). "A Note on Construction of Multiple Swap Curves with and without Collateral". CARF Working Paper Series No. CARF-F-154. SSRN 1440633.
  24. ^ Burgess, Nicholas (2017). FX Forward Invariance & Discounting with CSA Collateral
  25. ^ P. Hagan and G. West (2006). Interpolation methods for curve construction. Applied Mathematical Finance, 13 (2):89—129, 2006.
  26. ^ P. Hagan and G. West (2008). Methods for Constructing a Yield Curve. Wilmott Magazine, May, 70-81.
  27. ^ P du Preez and E Maré (2013). Interpolating Yield Curve Data in a Manner That Ensures Positive and Continuous Forward Curves. SAJEMS 16 (2013) No 4:395-406
  28. ^ Fabio Mercurio (2018). SOFR So Far: Modeling the LIBOR Replacement
  29. ^ FINCAD (2020). Future-Proof Curve-Building for the End of Libor
  30. ^ Finastra (2020). Transitioning from LIBOR to alternative reference rates
  31. ^ "Clearing Requirement Determination for Interest Rate Swaps". Federal Register. 24 August 2022. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  32. ^ "Council adopts revamped rules for EU clearing services". Council of the European Union. 19 November 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  33. ^ "Swaps Made Available To Trade (MAT) – summary". Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 7 July 2023. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  34. ^ "Interest Rate Instruments and Market Conventions" (PDF). OpenGamma. 16 December 2013. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  35. ^ "Swaps Made Available To Trade (MAT) – summary". Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 7 July 2023. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  36. ^ "Basel Framework MAR11 – Market risk definitions". Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  37. ^ "Interest rate basis risks in the Libor and RFR worlds". Bank for International Settlements. 5 December 2022. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  38. ^ "Counterparty credit risk in Basel III". Bank for International Settlements – Financial Stability Institute. 25 September 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  39. ^ "Review of the Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework" (PDF). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. July 2015. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  40. ^ "Central clearing: trends and current issues" (PDF). Bank for International Settlements. December 2015. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  41. ^ "Clearing risks in OTC derivatives markets: the CCP–bank nexus". Bank for International Settlements. December 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  42. ^ "SwapClear risk management". LCH. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  43. ^ "IFRS 9 Financial Instruments". IFRS Foundation. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  44. ^ "Accounting Standards Update 2017-12 — Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)" (PDF). Financial Accounting Standards Board. 12 August 2017. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  45. ^ "Accounting Standards Update 2022-01 — Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Fair Value Hedging — Portfolio Layer Method" (PDF). Financial Accounting Standards Board. 2022. Retrieved 14 October 2025.
  46. ^ "ICE Swap Rate". ICE Benchmark Administration. Retrieved 14 October 2025.

Further reading

[edit]

General:

Early literature on the incoherence of the one curve pricing approach:

Multi-curves framework:

[edit]

and are regarded as an